审稿意见回复模板

论文题目：Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B （一种病毒）

所投杂志：Life Sciences

投稿结果：这次大修后又经过一次小修，被接受发表 编辑信内容（注：有删节）： Dear Mr. XXX,

Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified referee . We think the manuscript has merit but requires revision before we can accept it for publication in the Journal. Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed below.

If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript

Dear Editor-in-Chief in XXXXXXX:

Thank you very much for your help in processing the review of our manuscript (Manuscript ID XXXXX). We have carefully read the thoughtful comments from you and reviewers and found that these suggestions are helpful for us to improve our manuscript. On the basis of the enlightening questions and helpful advices, we have now completed the revision of our manuscript. The itemized responses to the reviewers’ comments are listed in the succeeding sheets. We hope that all these corrections an

Dear Editor-in-Chief in XXXXXXX:

Thank you very much for your help in processing the review of our manuscript (Manuscript ID XXXXX). We have carefully read the thoughtful comments from you and reviewers and found that these suggestions are helpful for us to improve our manuscript. On the basis of the enlightening questions and helpful advices, we have now completed the revision of our manuscript. The itemized responses to the reviewers’ comments are listed in the succeeding sheets. We hope that all these corrections an

Dear Editor-in-Chief in XXXXXXX:

Thank you very much for your help in processing the review of our manuscript (Manuscript ID XXXXX). We have carefully read the thoughtful comments from you and reviewers and found that these suggestions are helpful for us to improve our manuscript. On the basis of the enlightening questions and helpful advices, we have now completed the revision of our manuscript. The itemized responses to the reviewers’ comments are listed in the succeeding sheets. We hope that all these corrections an

Review Form

Section I. General Information A. Overview

1. Reader Interest. Which category describes this manuscript?*

Practice/Application/Case Study/Experience Report Research/Technology Survey/Tutorial/How-To

2. How relevant is this manuscript to the readers of this periodical? Please explain your rating.*

Very Relevant Relevant

Interesting - but not very relevant Irrelevant

Comment

B. Content

1. Please explain how this manuscript advances this field of research and/or contributes something new to the literature.*

2. Is the ma

完美格式整理版

一些英文审稿意见的模板

最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个major revision后接收吧。呵呵

网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1、目标和结果不清晰。

It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.

2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。

In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.

Fu

'些英文审稿意见的模板【转】

来源：Elai ne 王倩的日志

最近导师让我帮忙审了两篇英文文章，觉得写的都不怎么样，顿时觉得自己的也不太差吧嘿嘿。但是怎么写评审还是有经验需要学习，自己也不能写的太不专业。不过我的意见也不过是给老师写意见的一个参考，具体能不能过我就毋须多言了。

网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1、目标和结果不清晰。

It is no ted that your manu scri pt n eeds careful edit ing by some one with exp ertise in tech ni cal En glish edit ing paying p articular atte nti on to En glish grammar, sp elli ng, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.

2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。

In general, there is a lack of explanation

一些英文审稿意见的模板【转】

来源： Elaine 王倩的日志

最近导师让我帮忙审了两篇英文文章，觉得写的都不怎么样，顿时觉得自己的也不太差吧嘿嘿。但是怎么写评审还是有经验需要学习，自己也不能写的太不专业。不过我的意见也不过是给老师写意见的一个参考，具体能不能过我就毋须多言了。

网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1、目标和结果不清晰。

It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.

2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。

In general, there is a lack of explanation of r

论文返修（response letter)一些很有用的套话

1、According to the associate editor and reviewers’ comments, we have made extensive modifications to our manuscript and supplemented extra data to make our results convincing.

2、In this revised version, changes to our manuscript were all highlighted within the document by using red colored text.

3、Thank you for your nice comments on our article. According to your suggestions, we have supplemented several data here and corrected several mistakes in our previous draft. Based on your comments, we

SCI论文全攻略之审稿回复实例

SCI论文全攻略之审稿回复实例.txt精神失常的疯子不可怕，可怕的是精神正常的疯子！附1：SCI扩展版和SCI核心版收录期刊的区别

SCI扩展版（以下简称SCIE）和SCI核心版（以下简称SCI）收录期刊还是有区别的，SCI期刊论文全部被SCI收录，SCIE期刊论文只是部分被SCI收录，这就是有的SCIE期刊一年有几百篇论文，却只有几十篇甚至十几篇论文被SCI收录的原因。具体到SCIE期刊上的一篇论文能否被SCI收录，还是要看美国ISI发布的报告，现在科技部信息研究所也公布这一报告，很多图书馆的SCI检索机构也可以查。

不过在国内，很多单位都把SCI期刊论文和SCIE期刊论文一视同仁，只要发表在SCI期刊或SCIE期刊上，该论文都当作SCI收录，这是管理者的无能抑或无为就不得而知了。但就我们单位而言（国内TOP10高校），这两者还是区别对待的，论文是否SCI收录还是看CISI的报告或SCI检索机构的证



附2：[精华]如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见(1)

1.所有问题必须逐条回答。

2.尽量满足意见中需要补充的实验。

3.满足不了的也不要回避，说明不能做的合理理由。

4.审稿人推荐的文献一定要引用，并讨论透彻。

以下是本人对审稿人