雅思作文热门话题原创参考范文

IELTSWritingTopic and ModelEssay

本文共44个话题,参考了各大网站的话题预测,范围涵盖政治,社会,科技,校园等,几乎可以在近期的考试中遇到相同或者类似的话题.

参考范文使用方法：熟读文章,记住文章中的主要论点和论据,以供以后写作参考.提炼文章中遇到的一些单词和短语短句,这些很多都可以应用到相同大类的题目中.（犯罪类,儿童成长类,科技类等等）参考作文中的一些提分的语法使用.（如虚拟语气以及定语后置等）有时间的同学最好按照话题重新写一遍,切忌全文背诵.不同于雅思口语,作文想提高分数,绝对不能靠死记硬背.因此这些文章仅供大家参考,大家有时间还是多去写,熟能生巧.有问题也欢迎与我交流.

2、Thereareplentyofoptionsavailableforspreadingnews,suchasnewspapers,

radio,TV,Internetandsoon.Accordingtoyouropinionwhatisthebestmediato use?Why? 3、Somepeoplebelievethereisnoplaceforwildanimalsin21stcentury,soto

prevent these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resources. To what extentdo you agree ordisagree?

4、Somepeoplethinkdistancelearninghasmorebenifitthanschoolssoschoolswill

disappearfromourlives.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?/Ascomputersandtechnology develop, they can be used to teach children and teachers won’tbenecessary soon. Do you agree or disagree?

5、PoliceinsomecountrieslikeEnglanddon’tcarryguns.Somepeopledon’t

approveofthisbecausetheythinkthatpolicewithgunsgivesthemsecurity.Others thinkthatpolicecarryinggunsdecreasescrimes.Whatisyouropinion?Giverelevant examplesandexperiences.

6、Somepeoplethinkthattohaveasuccessfullifeyouhavetohaveuniversity education,whileothersthinkit’snotthatimportant.Discussbothviewsandgive youropinionbasedonpersonalexperienceandknowledge. 7、

Somepeoplethinkthatspendingalotonholdingweddingparties,birthdayparties andothercelebrationsisjustawasteofmoney.Others,however,thinkthatthese arenecessaryforindividualsandthesociety.Discussbothviewsandgiveyou opinion. 8、Oftennewcommercialcentersareplanedwithrespecttogreenareasandsport

facilities. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Why? 9、

Somepeoplebelievethatchildrenshouldlearnscienceinschool,othersthink thatitisnotnecessarytoincludescienceingeneraleducation.Doyouagreeor disagreewiththestatement?Givereasonsforyouranswerandincludeanyrelevant examplesfromyourownknowledgeorexperience.

10、Youngpeoplespendlessoftheirfreetimewiththeirfamilynowadays.Whatare

the reasons for this? Are there more negative or positive sides to it? 11、Somepeoplesaythattobecomeagoodteacher,youshouldacquireenoughtraining,

whileotherssaythatteachingcapabilitiescanbedevelopedwithexperience.Discuss bothviewsandgiveyouropinion.

12、Manypeoplesaythatcompaniesandprivatetouroperatorsshouldpaythebills

forcleaninguppollution,insteadofthegovernment.Towhatextentdoyouagree ordisagreewiththat? 13、Somepeoplearguethatthefittestandstrongestindividualsandteamscanachieve

thegreatestsuccessinsports.Butotherpeoplethinkthesuccessismuchrelated tothementalattitude.Discussbothviewsandgiveyouropinion.

14、Somepeoplethinkthecheapairflightgivesordinarypeoplemorefreedom.However,

othersthinkthecheapairflightshouldbebannedbecauseitpollutestheairand bringsmanyotherproblems.Discussbothviewsandgiveyouropinion.

15、Somepeoplethinkthemainbenefitofinternationalcooperationisinprotection

oftheenvironment,whileothersthinkthatthemainbenefitisintheworldbusiness. Discussbothviewsandgiveyouropinion.

16、Solving environmental problems should be responsibility of one international

organizationinsteadofstateornationalgovernments.Doyouagreeordisagree? 17、Individualsandconuntriescannothelpeveryonewhoneedhelpintheworld,so weshouldbeonlyconcernedaboutourowncommunitiesandcountries.AgreeorDisagree? 18、Somepeoplethinkthatnooneshouldbeallowedtoworkaftertheageof65.Others saythatpeopleshouldbeallowedtoworkforaslongastheywantto.Discuss. 19、Groupandteamactivitiesaremoreimportantthantheactivesdonealone,because theyteachusimportantlifeskills.Doagreeordisagree?

20、Moreandmorepeoplearebecomingseriouslyoverweight.Somepeoplesaythatthe

priceincreaseoffatteningfoodswillsolvethisproblem.Towhatextentdoyouagree ordisagree? 21、Peopleareeatingavarietyoffoodsthesedayswhichencouragestheflowoffood

fromeverycorneroftheworldtoalocalsupermarket.Doyouthinkthisisnegative orpositivedevelopment?Why?

22、Mostoftheschoolsareplanningtoreplacesportsandexerciseclasseswithmore

academicsessions.Whatisyouropiniononthischange?Howisthischangewillaffect

children’s life in your view? 23、

Sportshelptoagreaterextenttobuildpeaceinworld.Doyouagreeordisagree? Givesomeexamplesandincluderelevantexperiencesinyourresponse.

24、Nowadays, children play less with others and this has an impact ontheirdevelopment. What are the reasons for this? Does it have a good or a bad effect on children? 25、

Inordertoimprovesafetyonourroadsmoreseverepunishmentshouldbe establishedfordrivingoffenses.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagreewiththis statement? 26、

Scientistsclaimthattheycantellwhetherachildwillbecomeacriminalby examiningthechildattheageof3.Doyouagreethatcrimeisaproductofhuman nature?Doyouthinkwecanstopchildrenfrombecomingcriminals? 27、

Thefunctionofprisonsispunishment;thereforelifeinprisonshouldbehard. Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree? 28、

Somepeoplebelievethatteenagersshouldberequiredtodounpaidcommunitywork intheirfreetime.Thiscanbenefittheteenagersandthecommunityaswell.Doyou agree or disagree? Give your own opinion. 29、

Childrennowadayspreferelectronic/computergamestoothergamesandtoys.Why isithappening?Isitapositiveoranegativetrend? 30、

Nowadayschildrenhavetoomuchfreedom.Doyouagreeordisagree? 31、

Publicmoneyshouldbespentonpromotinghealthylifestyleratherthantreating illnesses. Do you agree ordisagree? 32

、

NowadayspeopleprefertofollowsportseventsonTVratherthantakepartinsportsthemselves.Doyouthinkthisisapositiveoranegativedevelopment? 33、

Nowadays,peoplemovetobigcities.Whydoyouthinkthisishappening?Isthis trendabadoragoodthing?

34、Somepeoplethinkthatpoliticianshavethegreatestinfluenceontheworld.

Others,however,believethatscientistshavethegreatestinfluence.Discussbothviews and give your opinion.

35、Dotheadvantagesofprivatemeansoftransportationsuchascarsandmotorbikes

outweigh the disadvantages, compared to public transport (trains, buses and taxis)? Givereasonsforyouranswerandincluderelevantexamplesfromyourownexperience. Moreandmoreyoungpeopleholdimportantpositionsingovernment.Somepeople thinkitisnotsuitablebutothersthinkotherwise.Discussbothviewsandgiveyour ownopinion. 37、

Somepeoplethinkthatlawbreakersshouldbesenttoprison.However,othersthink 36、

thatbettertalentsamongthoseshouldbemadetowork.Discussbothviewsandgive youropinion. 38、

Menandwomenemployedinfull-timejobshavetoshareevenlyhouseholdchores andcaringforchildrenathome.Doyouagreeordisagreewiththisstatement?

39、Richnessisanimportantfactorinhelpingpeople.Towhatextentdoyouagree ordisagree 40、

Somecountriesinvestinspecializedtrainingcentersfortopathletesrather thaninpublicsportsfacilities.Doyouthinkthisisapositiveoranegative development? 41、

Somepeoplethinkthatdangeroussportsshouldbebanned,butothersthinkthe peopleshouldhavefreedomtochoosesportsactivities.Discussbothviewsandgive youropinion. 42、

Somepeopleclaimthatpublicmuseumsandartgallerieswillnotbeneededbecause peoplecanseehistoricalobjectsandworksofartbyusingacomputer.Doyouagree ordisagreewiththisopinion 43、

Somepeoplethinkthatdangeroussportsshouldbebanned,butothersthinkthe peopleshouldhavefreedomtochoosesportsactivities.Discussbothviewsand giveyouropinion. 44、Working conditions today are not the same as before and people no longer rely

ontakingonejobforlife.Discussthepossiblecausesofthesechangesandgive yoursuggestionsonhowpeopleshouldprepareforworkinthefuture

45、Somepeoplethinkthatmenandwomenhavedifferentqualities.Therefore,some

certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. Towhatextent do you agree or disagree?

1.Teachingprimaryschoolstudentsforeignlanguageshasmoreadvantagesthandisadvantages. Do you agree ordisagree?

In this day and age, due to the global homogenization, foreign language is of more andmoresignificance in our daily life. And multitudes of primary schools commence toinculcateforeign languages. This phenomenon has sparked prevalent debate. Personally, I believetheadvantages outweigh thedisadvantages.

Undeniably, mastering several foreign languages is a competitive edge incontemporarysociety. In contrast, being impeded by their language skills, people who can only speaktheirnativelanguageareconsideredtobeleftbehind.Providedthatapersonwastaughtwithforeign language courses in his primary school stage, he would be more easily to realizetheimportanceofforeignlanguageandlearnitmorediligently.Furthermore,thestudyintheprimary school lays the foundation for their further study, meanwhile offeringalanguage-friendly environment in their childhood. So in essence, learning foreign languageisindispensable in this fiercely competitivesociety.

Secondly, based on scientific evidence, learning language in elder age never managestoreach a comparable level with learning in primary school stage. As human beings growolder,it is more difficult and arduous for them to digest the knowledge and memorizethevocabulary.BythatImean,enablingpersonstoenhancethelanguageliteracyaswellasgrasp the knowledge point, elementary school stage is the prime time for masteringforeignlanguage.

Further speaking, imparting language in elementary school is advantageous for wholesocietyand the development of a nation. Enhancing the overall quality of youngsters, it isfavorablefor a country to communicate and collaborate with other nations in future. Moreover,anincreasing number of young people have the capability of language literacy to studyabroad,thenbringingtheadvancedscienceandtechnologybacktotheirmotherland.Fromthispointof view, although governments have to shift more financial resources to education, it isquiteworthwhile.

Having considered all the arguments above, I am convinced that imparting foreignlanguageinprimaryschooldoesmorefavorthanharm.Nomatterfromtheangleofindividualsandnations, it is beneficial. So authorizes would be well-advised to encourage thelanguageeducation in elementaryschool.

2.Thereareplentyofoptionsavailableforspreadingnews,suchasnewspapers,radio,TV,Internetandsoon.Accordingtoyouropinionwhatisthebestmediato use? Why?

Inthisdayandage,asthetechnologyisburgeoning,therearemultitudesofmediastyles.However,

among these which are most desirable has sparked prevalent debate. Personally,Ibelieve internet can beat theothers.

Undeniably, typically youngsters tend to count on information highway to receivemessages.Timeliness and richness are the most evident advantages of internet and other mediastylesare pale in comparison with internet. Internet has the capability to disseminate the newstothepublicinseveralminutesaftertheeventhappens.Moreover,thevolumeforinternetisway biggerthanothers.Thatistosay,

notbeinglimitedbyspacelikenewspapers,theinternetcanofferawealthyofnews.Inotherwords,itisinfinite.

Secondly, internet is more personalized. Unlike TV and newspaper which compelindividualsto receive unified message, internet capacitates persons to read anything in accordancewiththeir needs and preferences. For instance, by way of internet, a fanatic sports fan can logonsport-specificwebsitestoreadwhateverhewants,theup-to-dateandwealthysportnews,sport comments. In contrast, he can only read the article of limited length regarding sportsinnewspaper and watch restricted sport program onTV.

Further speaking, compared with other styles, internet is low-costandenvironmental-friendly.Foronething,networkdoesn’tcallforacompanytohiretheTVpresenter to record program like TV. For another, as a virtual media, internet doesn’trequiretangible things to be the media tool. That is to say, unlike newspaper which depletes treestomake paper, information highway doesn’t consume natural resources atall.

Having considered all the arguments above, I am surely convinced that beingspeedy,abundant,personalizedandlow-carbon,theinternetisbetterthanothers.Althoughithassomedisadvantageslikeexcessiveviolentandpornographiccontents,Iamsureitwillbeofmore and more importance in our dailylife.

3、Somepeoplebelievethereisnoplaceforwildanimalsin21stcentury,sotopreventthesewildanimalsfromdyingoutisawasteofresources.Towhatextent do you agree ordisagree?

Inthisdayandage,asthespeedydevelopmentofhumansociety,humankindsnecessitatedmoreresourcestosustaintheirdailylives.However,duetotheconsumptionofresourcesand occupation of lands, should we devote ourselves in protecting endangered animalshassparkledprevalentdebates.Personally,Ibelieveitisessentialandbeneficial.

Undeniably, even though land resources are precious, it is common practice forgovernmentsto set wildlife reserves in contemporary society. It is imperative no matter from the angleofhuman beings’ own lives or the moral value. Firstly, endangered species are thecomponentpart of biologic chain. Being interdependent and interrelated, they prey on animals inlowerleveltocurbtheirrampantgrowthandfallpreytocreaturesinhigherleveltosustaintheirsurvivals. If one species were eliminated from the chain, it would be disastrousanddetrimental to all creatures, including human race. Secondly, harmonious coexistenceisadvocated nowadays. According to animal rights activists’ idea, animals are equalwithmankind and ought to share the earth together. Provided that people occupiedmostresources and left little to other creatures, it would be quite self-centered to themselvesandpretty merciless toanimals.

Admittedly,protectingendangeredanimalscanbetime-consumingandlesscost-effective.Moreover, they call for a host of eliminative areas to keep wild, foster basic abilities andbearoffspring. Originally, people can exploit these areas to benefit and develop themselves. Somepeopleopposesettingprotectionareaonthegroundofthesereasons.Havingsaidthese,however,evenifithassuchdisadvantages,woulditbenopointsinprotectingcreatures?By no means. Biodiversity corresponds with mankinds’ demand for a decentexistentenvironment. The extinction of one species is irreversible and gives rise tocatastrophicconsequencetobiosphere.Humanbeingscan’tlivewithoutawholesomebiosphere,letalone augment the quality oflife.

Havingconsideredalltheargumentsabove,Iamconvincedthatpreventingwildcreaturesformdyingoutisindispensableforus.Itisconcernedwithmankind’sowninterest,alsoaccordingwithvaluetheory.Forindividuals,theyarewell-advisedtodotheirutmosttoprotect endangeredspecies.

4. Somepeoplethinkdistancelearninghasmorebenifitthanschoolssoschoolswill disappear from our lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?/Ascomputersandtechnologydevelop,theycanbeusedtoteachchildrenandteacherswon’t be necessary soon. Do you agree ordisagree?

In this day and age, as the technology is burgeoning, multitudes of individuals chooseremoteinstruction rather than schooling as education tool. However, which is moredesirable,traditional education or distance learning has sparkled prevalent debate. Personally, Ibelievethe former beats thelatter.

Undeniably,themajorwayforhumanbeingtoreceiveeducationisstillattendingschoolincontemporary society. Compared with remote seminar, schooling can be morepersonalized.By that I mean, grabbing the weakness of the students and imparting keyknowledgetargetedly, school teachers are able to enhance the learning level of educatee morespeedily.In contrast, inculcating the unified courses, distance learning can’t meet the individualneedsofstudents.

Secondly,theprimarygroupforreceivingeducationisyoungsterandchildrenwhichcanbebestcharacterizedbylowself-controlandconcentration.Providedthatallteenagerswereempoweredtoattendclassonlinewithoutthesurveillanceofelders,ahostofthemwouldbedistractedbyothersratherthanbeingimmersedinthecourses.However,forschooling,with the help of several teaching methods such as the penalty for unruly students,checkingupthehomework,instructorscanrenderthestudentsdotheirutmosttostudy.

Further speaking, if a majority of students were permitted to study online,theunemploymentfortheexistingpersonnelinschoolswouldbeinevitable,posingaseverethreat to social stability. What’s more, the feasibility for the popularization ofremoteinstructioninlargeareaisquitelow.BythatImean,ontheconditionthatsomeproblemslike copyright issue and fees issue haven’t been resolved in distance learning, it isexpedientto keepschooling.

Having considered all the arguments above, I am surely convinced that withpersonalization,effectiveness and high feasibility, traditional schooling is better than modern remoteseminar.Fortheauthorities,theywouldbewell-advisedtosticktothepolicythatgivingprioritytoschooling, supplemented by distancelearning.

5. Police in some countries like England don’t carry guns. Some peopledon’tapproveofthisbecausetheythinkthatpolicewithgunsgivesthemsecurity.Othersthinkthatpolicecarryinggunsdecreasescrimes.Whatisyouropinion?Give relevant examples andexperiences.

In this day and age, as more and more individuals choose to migrate tometropolis,department of public safety needs higher competency to maintain the socialsociety.However, should policemen carry guns when patrolling has sparkled prevalentdebate.Personally, I believe it is quiteindispensable.

Undeniably,thenumberofmalignanteventssuchasrobbery,murderandrapehassoaredremarkably in most cities due to the increasing population. The perpetrators not only poseathreattocity-dwellers,butalsoconstituteadangertothesafetyofpolicementhemselves.Without the gun, when encountering the crimes, I believe a host of polices would not daretostrugglewiththegangsters,letalonebringthemtojustice.BythatImean,offeringtheconfidenceasakindoflethalweapon,gunscanenhancethesuccessratioofcapture.

Secondly, I believe no matter how vicious the criminals are, they all have somewhatdreadandfearbeforetheycommit.Providedthatanoffenderknewthateverypolicebroughtagun when patrolling in advance, majority of them would suspend the criminal acts due totheapprehension about being incarcerated or shot. In this way, being a deterrent forpotentialperpetrators,gunsareable topreventthehappeningofmultitudesof offences.

Furtherspeaking,somecitizensareopposedtopolicemenbringinggunsonthegroundofthe abuse of weapons and accidental injury of innocent individuals. I admit the existenceofabove-mentioned behaviors but actually they are definitely small probabilityevents.Moreover, as the authorities are doing their utmost to boost the competency andcapabilityof policemen recently, I believe the frequency of these behaviors will decrease dramaticallyinfuture.

Having considered all the arguments above, I am surely convinced that carrying weaponsforpolicemen does more merit than harm. It not only improves the success rate of capture,butalso gives deterrent to subtle culprits. So, on the condition that the lawenforcementcapabilityisbeingenhancedcontinually,bringinggunsisbeneficialforbothpolicemenandcity-dwellers.

11、Some people say that to become a good teacher, you should acquireenoughtraining, while others say that teaching capabilities can be developedwithexperience. Discuss both views and give youropinion.

In this day and age, as the speedy development of education, teachers call forhighercompetenciesthanbefore.However,whichisessentialtobeadecentteacher,systematictraining or affluent teaching experience, has sparkled spirited debate. Some peoplebelieveexperience is be of more importance than training. Personally, I sympathize with theirview.

Undeniably, schools tend to recruit more middle-aged employees who havehands-onbackgroundthanyoungteacherswhojustgraduatedfromuniversities.Experienceistakenprecedenceineducationfieldfromtherequirementofhighqualityteaching.Firstly,activelearning is more efficient than passive learning. According to pyramid memory ruleproposedbyanAmericaneducationalist,inreceivingcourses,individualsonlycanremember30%contentsaftertwoweekswhilethisfigureis90%whenyouplanacourseandimpartwhatyoulearntoothers.Inthisway,activelearningliketeachingcanfacilitateacomprehensiveunderstanding of knowledge and enhance teaching level. Secondly, teachers areresponsiblein cultivating students both in knowledge level and spirit level. However, howtocommunicatewithchildrenandbetterchildren’smentalitynecessitatesmoreexperiencethantheory.Onlythroughapplication,canateacheradjustmeasurestodifferingconditions.

Admittedly, adequate training plays a significant role in teacher judgment. It enablesteachersbe more professional and learned. Having said this, however, training doesn’t mean all to bea desirable teacher. Students’ capabilities of understanding are distinctive with teachers.BythatImean,providedthatteachersjustrepeatedthetrainingcourses,childrenwouldonlyacceptlittle.Withoutlong-termapplication,teacherswouldn’tconcentrateonthecrucialpoints where students comprehend poorly and make the class moretargeted.

Havingconsideredallargumentsabove,Ibelieverichteachingexperiencewhichcorrespondswith teacher competency can’t be substituted by training. For schools, they arewell-advisedto stick to the principle that giving priority in experience, supplemented by knowledgelevelwhenrecruiting.

12. Many people say that companies and private tour operators should paythebillsforcleaninguppollution,insteadofthegovernment.Towhatextentdoyou agree or disagree withthat?

In this day and age, burgeoning tourist industry gives rise to environmental deteriorationinsome tourist attractions. Meanwhile, is decontamination the commitment of governmentortourists has sparkled spirited debate. Some people believe that travel agencies andtravelersshould pay surcharges for pollution. Personally, I find their viewunconvinced.

Undeniably, it is not a standard practice for individual to pay the bills forbetteringenvironment in contemporary society. It should be government’s undertaking no matterfromthe angel of country or citizenry. Firstly, governments have already collected taxfromnationals and tax should be used for the people while it has been levied fromthem.Compared with utilizing tax revenue to handle the problem, asking for surchargestoindividuals which equals to tax repeatedly is kind of unjustifiable. Secondly, for humanbeing,no one is willing to pay extra money. More precisely, this action would be detrimentaltotourism, also spoiling the government’s image in citizenry. The reduction ofauthority’scredibilityposesathreattoitsreputationbuildingandnationaldevelopment.

Admittedly, charging extra fee enables government to allocate adequate funds incombatingpollution, also making all tourists take this problem seriously. Numerous people supportthisviewonthegroundofthisreason.Havingsaidthis,however,suchmeasureisnotsuitablenow.Foronething,itisunwarrantedforalltravelersshoulderingobligationstoclearupthepollutionwhichshouldbeattributedtoasmallnumberofunethicaltourists.Foranother,itcan’t really eradicate misconducts in tourist attractions fundamentally. By that I mean,someimmoralpeoplestillpersisttheiroldbehaviorsbecausetheyonlypayfortinymoney.Somemeasureslikelegislatingrelevantlawsandreinforcingsupervisionaremoreefficient.

Havingconsideredallthearguments,payingbyauthorityismoresensibleaccordingtotherequirement of citizenry and country. However, how to alleviate untileliminatingcontaminationneedsalong-termpolicy.Forgovernments,theywouldbewell-advisedtotake their utmost to handle thisproblem.

13. Somepeoplearguethatthefittestandstrongestindividualsandteamscanachievethegreatestsuccessinsports.Butotherpeoplethinkthesuccessismuchrelatedtothementalattitude.Discussbothviewsandgiveyouropinion.

Inthisdayandage,athletesareconfrontedwithcliffcompetition.Meanwhile,whichisofmore

significance, strength or mentality in race, has sparkled spirited debate. Personally,Ibelieve genuine athletic ability prevails over mentalstate.

Undeniably, most individuals and teams who get desirable achievement are well-trainedandhaveauthenticability.Strengthisthekeydeterminantinsports.Firstly,thereisaproverb,saying “God helps those who help themselves”. By that I mean, there is no shortcutinsuccess and only constant practicing to enhance themselves can lead triumph. Forinstance,Beckham who is regard as the best free-kicker in the world normally practices 300 freekicksalone after general training sessions. Secondly, practice makes perfect. More precisely,thebehaviors of strongest individuals in courts are based on spontaneity and habit rather thanaflash in the pan. Hence, the grades they procure would not differ much betweendistinctivementalattitudes.

Admittedly, some athletes lose the match due to weak mental state. Things likeheavypsychologicalburdenandexcessivetensioncandeformthetechnicalmovementsinrace,posingathreattoathletes.Consequently,avastnumberofpeoplethinkmentalattitudeismore important on the ground of this reason. Having said this, however, decent mentalstateis predicated on strength. Provided that an athlete has already received vast trainingandpossessedconsiderablecompetitiveness,heislikelytobeprettyconfidentandlessnervous.

Having considered all the arguments above, I believe genuine strength is imperativeincompetitive sports. No doubt mentality is an influencing factor but it hinges on strength.Forathletics themselves, they would be well-advised to be industrious in order toenhancethemselves.

14、Somepeoplethinkthecheapairflightgivesordinarypeoplemorefreedom.However,othersthinkthecheapairflightshouldbebannedbecauseitpollutestheairandbringsmanyotherproblems.Discussbothviewsandgiveyouropinion.

Inthisdayandage,increasingnumberofpeopletakelow-costairlinesfortrip.However,should these budget airlines be prohibited due to air contamination and other problemshassparkledspiriteddebate.Personally,Ibelievebudgetairlinesdomoremeritsthanharms.

Undeniably,low-costcarriershavealreadyplayedasignificantroleinaircraftindustry.Theyare

favorable and laudable no matter from the angel of world economy or individuals.Firstly,budgetairlinesdrivetheeconomicdevelopmentallovertheworld.Theyenablemorepeopletostepoutfromtheir

homesandconsumeindifferentplaces.Inthisway,theseexpendituresenhance some industries like tourism substantially. Secondly, they facilitate thetripremarkably, providing an opportunity for average persons to spot the breathtaking sceneryinvarious tourist attractions, especially remote from homes. Without them, traveling aboardwould only be an extravagant hope for a vast number of individuals due to the priceyticketsof internationalflights.

Admittedly,budgetairlinesgiverisetoairpollution.Inaddition,somepeoplebelievetheytriggerviciouscompetitioninallairlinesandcompelsomereducedpriceswhichareevenlower than costs. On the ground of these, they think low-cost carriers should bebanned.Having said this, however, their view is kind of one-sided. For one thing, comparedwithbanningthemstringently,collectingsurchargesfromthemisapreferablechoicetocombatcontamination problem. For another, each airline has their own target customer and onlybyway of competition can force each entrepreneur to enhance it itself to attractmoreconsumers.

Having considered all the arguments above, I think despite some weaknesses likeairpollution, low-cost airlines are beneficial in enriching people’s trip mode andpromotingworld tourism. For governments, they would be well-advised to encouragetheirdevelopment rather than obstruct evenprohibit.

15. Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation isinprotectionoftheenvironment,whileothersthinkthatthemainbenefitisinthe world business. Discuss both views and give youropinion.

Inthisdayandage,astheconsolidationofglobalization,collaborationamongnationshasplayedapivotalroleincombatingvariousaffairs.However,istheeconomyorenvironmentpreservationthemajorbenefitofinternationalcooperationhassparkledspiriteddebate.Personally, I am convinced the primary function collaboration shows is promotingeconomy.

Undeniably,internationalcollaborationhasbecomeamajorstyleinbusinessfiled.Almostevery

country participates in cooperation can boost its economic level. Firstly, ineconomics,by way of collaboration one nation is able to export products they havecomparativeadvantageandimportwhattheyhavecomparativedisadvantage.Inthisway,citizenscanexchangemoreandeconomicstatuscanbeaugmented.Secondly,collaborationtypicallyaccordswiththerequirementofmutualbenefits.Forinstance,itisawin-winstationformultinationalenterprisetooutsourcesomeoftheirbusiness.Duetothehighlaborcostindomestic country, multitudes of ventures opt for developing countries as theirmanufacturingbase. For the developing nations, it affords extra employment opportunities andboomeconomy. For the companies, it curtails the expensesremarkably.

Admittedly, environment is linked to the interest of all mankind. So theoretically, countriesareeasierandmorestraightforwardtogetconsensusincollaboration.Manypeoplethinkthe major gain is environment maintenance on the ground of this reason. But as a matteroffact,ittypicallywitnessesatoughprocesstoachieveaunanimousviewonenvironmentcooperationduetoselfishnessofeverynation.Forinstances,numerousdevelopingcountriesdenounced USA of rejecting to curtail the carbon emissions while America claimed thatthosedevelopingcountriesshouldshoulderresponsibilityfortheglobalwarning.

Having considered all the arguments above, I believe the primary benefits ofglobalcooperation are on business level rather than environment level. However,handlingcontamination problem calls for international collaboration. For countries all over theworld,theywouldbewell-advisedtoputasideminordifferencessoastoseekcommongroundand be less materialistic, moreresponsible.

16、Solvingenvironmentalproblemsshouldberesponsibilityofoneinternationalorganizationinsteadofstateornationalgovernments.Doyouagreeordisagree?

Currently, as more and more contamination problems have emerged,environmentpreservationhascausedintenseattention.Meanwhile,ahostofindividualsholdtheviewthat it is international association’s rather than national authorities’ obligation to handlethepollution. Personally, I think this viewpoint isill-found.

Undeniably,aspecificcontaminationproblemstemsfromdomesticfactorsbasically.Itismore

beneficial to tackle it no matter from the angle of morality or effectiveness.Firstly,beingcausedbynativecorporationsorindividuals,theenvironmentalconditionshouldbeimproved with the fund which is levied from them. It is unjustifiable forinternationalorganization using the capital which is sponsored entities all over the world to deal

withthat.Secondly,ononeknowstheenvironmentalsituationmoredetailedlyanddistinctlythandomestic authorities. International associations never manage to reach a comparable levelinthisrespect.Gettingtheelaboratecircumstance,thegovernmentsarecapacitatedtoshiftappropriatefinancialresourcesandusesuitablemanpowertohandleit.

Admittedly, it calls for the coordination of international organizations in some severeandtremendous problem like global warming. Moreover, the capability of pollution abatementofstate governments can be enhanced with the help of them. However, even iftheyparticipatedindecontamination,wouldtherebenopointsfornationalauthoritiestogetinvolved? By no means. For one thing, normally organizations play the role of instructorsanditisthegovernmentstotakesubstantialactions.Foranother,inmultitudesofcasesforinternationalcooperation,themercenaryauthoritiestendtoshirkresponsibilitieswiththeintervention of internationalassociations.

Havingconsideredalltheargumentsabove,Iamsurelyconvincedtheactionsofnationalgovernments are indispensable in tacking environmental problem. We would be welladvisedto adhere the policy that giving priority to governmental behavior, supplemented by thehelpof internationalorganization.

17、Individualsandconuntriescannothelpeveryonewhoneedhelpintheworld,so we should be only concerned about our own communities andcountries.Agreeor Disagree?

In this day and age, due to the enhancing globalization and burgeoning economy,thedisparity between people and nations has been expanded. However, shouldaffluentindividuals and developed countries aid the impoverished and less-developing onehassparkledspiriteddebate.Personally,Ibelievemutualaidsshouldbeadvocatedallovertheworld.

Undeniably,avastnumberofgroupsdevotethemselvesinhelpingothersvariousactions.Lendingahandtootherscorrespondstotheirobligationintheworld,alsobenefitingthemthemselves sometimes. Firstly, who world is made up of each country and each citizen. Asanentityintheworld,everynationandindividualoughttoshouldertheresponsibilitytogiveaid and support to the weak one in order to boost the welfare of world. Having fulfilledthebasicexistencevalueintheworld,peopleandnationswhoarebentonhelpingotherstypically enjoy superb reputation and large following. Secondly, normally, the aidingactivitiesarealsoadvantageoustothosewhoprovideassistance.Forinstance,itisawin-winstationfor multinational enterprise to outsource some of their business and set manufacturingbasein order to boost local economy. For the companies, it curtails the expenses remarkablydueto the cheap laborcost.

Admittedly, one entity can only aid finite groups. In this way, one individual or country hasatremendousdifficultyincurbtheincreasingwealthgap,letalonereverseit.Somepeoplethinkoneentityshouldcareaboutitselfratherthanothersonthegroundofthisreason.Havingsaidthis,however,evenifeveryone’scontributionistidy,wouldtherebenopointinhelpingothers?Bynomeans.Everyentity’sendeavorcanbeaccumulatedtoapowerfuldriving force. Provided that everyone faced up to their incumbent responsibility in theworld,takingsomefeasibleactionstoaidothers,anidealsocietywouldcomesoonerorlater.

Havingconsideredalltheargumentsabove,Iamconvincedthattheaidingbehaviorsformindividualsandgovernmentsaredesirableandsignificant.Theyaccordwithmoralvaluewhichhasbeenhighlyrecommendedsinceancienttimeandmutualbenefits.Ithinkthespirit that taking pleasure in helping others would be well-advised to be encouraged allovertheworld.

18、Some people think that no one should be allowed to work after the ageof 65.Otherssaythatpeopleshouldbeallowedtoworkforaslongastheywantto. Discuss.

Currently, as a host of countries commence to control the boost tendency of population,theaging problem has caused intense attention. However, should seniors continue to

workaftertheretirementagehassparkledprevalentdebate.Personally,Ithinktheyoughttostopworking after65.

Undeniably, it is standard practice for elders to stay home to live out their lives indevelopednations.Comparedwithproceedingtowork,itismorebeneficialnomatterfromtheangleofmoralityorsociety.Firstly,dedicatingthemselvestotheircareersformostoftheirlives,elderly

people should spend their remaining time on enjoying their lives andcompletingsomethingunfinishedwhichtheyshouldhavedoneintheiryouth.Itisunjustifiableandinhumane for seniors to work after retirement. Secondly, as the competition hasbecomeincreasinglystiff,itisroughforyoungsterstofindajobincontemporarysociety.Iftheagedkeptoccupyingtheposition,itislesslikelyfortheyouthtoseekoutajobvacancy,letalonegetajobtoearnmoney.Furthermore,theseunemployedyoungpeopleposeathreattosocial stability and publicsecurity.

Admittedly, in some special circumstances, a number of seniors have to work to shouldertheresponsibilities to support their families. And a small group of old individuals just adoretheirjob and they can acquire the sense of achievement from their jobs. Moreover,havingabundant working experience normally, they are able to promote the progress ofyoungsters.However, even if it had such merits for seniors to work, would there be no pointsforgovernmentstoprohibititstringently?Bynomeans.Typicallyseniorsareoutofconditionand it was detrimental and hazardous for them to continue working. However, some ofthemjust have no awareness of that or hold the fluky mentality. Under thiscircumstance,authorities should undertake the due obligation to forbid elders towork.

Having considered all the arguments above, I am surely convinced that workingafterretirement is baneful and dangerous for both society and themselves. Seniors would bewelladvisedtoenjoytheirlivesrather thandedicatingthemselvesintheirremainingyears.

19、Groupandteamactivitiesaremoreimportantthantheactivesdonealone,because they teach us important life skills. Do agree ordisagree?

Currently,asthefrequencyofcommunicationamongindividualsisincreasing,therearemultitudes of opportunities for people to do teamwork. However, the comparisonbetweengroupactivitiesandindividualactivitieshassparkledprevalentdebate.Personally,Ibelieveteam-based activities are morebeneficial.

Undeniably, no matter in career or in relaxation, it is more and more difficult for anindividualto finish a mission without others’ favor and advice. Having become a trend incontemporarysociety, teamwork is indispensable and more advantageous from the angle of bothindividualand group. Firstly, absorbing other persons’ knowledge and experience, individuals

areabletomakeprogressandenhancetheirskillsbywayofteamwork.Moreover,groupactivitiesoffer an opportunity for persons to communicate with others, promoting eachother’srelationship and getting acquaint of new companions. In this way, teamworkenablesindividuals to expand their own social circle. Secondly, normally teamwork requirestheopinions of all participants and finally they can get a comprehensive and convictivesolution.In contrast, the advice of one person never manages to reach a comparablelevel.Furthermore, even in the group games like football and basketball, the sense ofachievementand victory they acquire is larger than individualgame.

Admittedly,undersomespecialcircumstancesindividualshavetobealone.Forahostofpersons, the efficiency is higher without the interference from others. Moreover,someindividual activities like fishing also can cultivate the temperament. However, evenindividualactivitieshadsuchmerits,wouldtherebenopointsforlaunchinggroupactivities?Bynomeans.Thecommunicationandcoordinationaremorefrequentnowadays.Ifanindividualkeptbealoneanddidn’tcontactwithothers,hewouldlostcapabilitiestocollaboratewithothersgradually.

Havingconsideredtheargumentsabove,Ibelieveteamactivitiesaremoresignificantandfavorablethanindividualactivities.Nomatterinworkorinrecreation,wewouldbewelladvised to seek the chance to coordinate withothers.

20、Moreandmorepeoplearebecomingseriouslyoverweight.Somepeoplesaythatthepriceincreaseoffatteningfoodswillsolvethisproblem.Towhatextentdoyou agree or disagree?

Currently,astheeconomiclevelofcitizenshasenhancedremarkably,anincreasingnumberofindividuals are becoming plump. However, a host of persons believe the solution of overweightistoboostthepriceofhigh-caloriefood. Personally,Ithinkthisviewisill-founded.

Undeniably, the price should be decided by market and the compulsive change for price willbringprofound repercussion to the market. The policy of increasing price is detrimentalandunadvisable no matter from the angle of demanders and suppliers. Firstly, being a kindofunrestricted and prevalent goods in the market, fattening food is consumed by all kind ofpersonsratherthantheoverweightgroupthemthemselves.Forinstance,athletesneedittomaintainstaminaandslimpersonstakeitforgainingweight.Ifauthoritiesboostthepriceinordertoprevent fatties from buying, it is unjustifiable for other persons. Secondly, for thecompanieswhichmanufacturehigh-caloriefood,theywouldsufferalossfromthatmeasure.Duetothehigherprice,fewercustomerswouldconsumefatteningfood,givingrisetothedeclineofsalesvolume.Fromthispointofview,thiswouldbedisastrousforthislow-profitindustry.

Admittedly, the growing price can restrain the purchasing behavior of a fewoverweightindividuals. Moreover, normally fattening food is unwholesome and shouldn’t be encouragedtoall human beings. However, even if this measure had such merits, could it resolve theoverweightproblem fundamentally? By no means. Being intrinsically inexpensive goods, food is afforded bymost individuals. By that I mean, as long as the consumers have preference, the increasingpricecan’tpreventthemfrombuying.Smokeisacaseinpoint.Governmentshavealreadyraisedtheprice for smoke remarkably but there is still a vast of purchasingbehaviors.

Having considered all the arguments above, I am surely convinced increasing price is notalaudable way to tackle the problem. The governments would be well advised to do theirutmostto change the concept and preference rather than control the buyingbehavior.

21.Peopleareeatingavarietyoffoodsthesedayswhichencouragestheflowoffoodfromeverycorneroftheworldtoalocalsupermarket.Doyouthinkthisisnegativeor positive development?Why?

Currently, as the world commerce is getting more and more advanced, people havetheopportunitytoeatallsortsofdelicaciesallovertheworld.However,thisphenomenonhassparkled prevalent debate. Personally, I believe the advantages outweigh thedisadvantages.

Undeniably, an increasing number of supermarkets commence to offer importedfoodstuffnowadays. It is beneficial no matter from the angle of consumers or the exporting country.Firstly,being accustomed to have domestic food, the majority of people are curious about foreignfood,yearningtohaveataste.However,duetotheeconomicrestriction,itisunrealisticformostofthemtogoaboardtotastethelocaldelicacies.Underthiscircumstance,theimportedfoodonsale enabled them to enjoy the food all over the world in their homes, making their dreamscometrue. Secondly, sometimes because the consumption capability is limited, a nation is not abletodigestalltheproductsithasmanufactured.Onthisoccasion,Exportcapacitatesdomesticfoodtobe consumed in international markets, bring tremendous financial income to thenation.Moreover, the exported delicacies can be a symbol for the nation, attracting a host ofindividualsto visit fortours.

Admittedly, takingoveraportionofsalesindomesticmarket,importedfood may poseathreattonative food manufacturing companies. Moreover, some of them can be unwholesome orill-fittedfornativetotake.However,evenifimportednourishmenthassuchharms,wouldtherebenopoints for importing it? By no means. For one thing, the market should be competitive andwhatthe native corporations should do is to enhance the quality of their products rather thanpreventforeign food from entering. For another, the health problem can be resolved by somemeasuresabsolutely. For instance, the food and sanitation officials can strengthen the supervisionofimportedfood.

Havingconsideredalltheargumentsabove,Ibelievethisphenomenondoesmoremeritsthanperils. It is favorable for both the customers and exporting nations. The governments wouldbewelladvisedtogiveincentivetothecommoditycirculationintheworld.

22、Mostoftheschoolsareplanningtoreplacesportsandexerciseclasseswithmoreacademicsessions.Whatisyouropiniononthischange?Howisthischangewill affect children’s life in yourview?

Currently, as the competition is becoming increasingly stiff in the society, students havetospendmoretimeonstudythanbefore.However,thephenomenonthatavastofschoolscommence to arrange more academic courses instead of sports has sparkledprevalentdebate. Personally, I believe it isbaneful.

Undeniably, schools play a pivotal role for adolescents to mould their characters andenhancethemselves roundly. Under the circumstance that physical education class is a wayforstudentstogrowandbetterthemselves,replacingitwiththeorycurriculumisdetrimentalfor them. Firstly, sports class is the most effective way for teenagers to work outandstrengthen their physique. It lays the foundation for their healthy growth. If theywererestricted from taking P.E lessons, they would be susceptible to illness, obesity, over fatigueinthe future. Secondly, having the opportunity to communicate with others, childrenarecapacitatedtoenhancetheircommunicationskillsandteamworkabilitybywayofgroupactivities such as football and basketball games. In reality, they have little timeparticipatinggroupgameswithpeersexpectsportsclass.Fromthispointofview,lackingthecapacitytocoordinate with others, youngsters would lose their competitiveness compared withpeerswithout P.Elessons.

Admittedly, augmenting academic sessions is an approach to improve students’ learninglevel.Inthisway,

theymaybeapttoenterasplendiduniversityandsuccessintheircareers.However,evenifithassuchmerits,wouldtherebenopointstokeepsportsclass?Bynomeans.Foronething,P.Elessonsandenhancinglearningskillsarenotmutuallyexclusive.Forinstance,schoolscangivetheirutmosttoboostteachingqualityratherthansubstitutesportslesson for academic one to tackle learning problem. For another, dampening enthusiasmfor study, adding theoretical courses excessively is counterproductive. Oppositely,combiningphysical exercise and knowledge learning enables students to study moreefficiently.

Having considered all the arguments above, I am surely convinced the disadvantages forthisreplacement outweigh the advantages. It is negative and detrimental for the developmentofyoungsters and we shouldn’t advocate thisphenomenon.

23、Sports help to a greater extent to build peace in world. Do you agreeordisagree?Givesomeexamplesandincluderelevantexperiencesinyourresponse.

Currently,sportsplayamoreandmoresignificantroleinourdailylivesandtherearelargemultitude matches held all over the world. However, whether sports are beneficialtocontribute towards the world peace has sparkled prevalent debate. Personally, I believe itisabsolutelyhelpful.

Undeniably, most international sports events comply with the principal that giving prioritytofriendship.Inthisway,thepurposeforsportsisconsistentwithconstructingapeacefulworld.Under this circumstance, sports are favorable to world peace. Firstly, sports offeranopportunityforindividualsindifferentnationstocommunicatewitheachother.Moreover,sometimestheoutstandingathleteswillgotoothercountrieswhichareinlowsportsleveltobethecoachestohelpthemmakeprogress.Dedicatinghimselftotheirnation,thispersoncan mitigate the antagonism for the nationals to his country. Secondly,large-scaleinternational sports events can be a desirable way for government to launch “sportsdiplomacy”. 2008 Beijing Olympic Games is a case in point. Chinese authorities declaredthepeaceful hope to the world through this chance. Furthermore, they invited a vast ofpoliticians in the world to attend the opening ceremony, making opportunity for themtonegotiate someaffairs.

Admittedly, sometimes due to the drastic competition, the sports event may fuel thehostilityamong nations, especially for the countries which have a mass of fanatical sportsfans.However, even sports have such peril, would their contribution to world peace be denied?

Bynomeans.Foronething,sportseventcausingantagonismissmallprobabilityevent.Asthefriendship is widely advocated in sports, human beings tend to acquire more happinessfromsports rather than enmity. For another, a sensible government knows how to subsidethenegative emotion of their nationals and reduce the potential adverse impact ofsportsbecause sport is just an entertainingtool.

Having considered all the arguments above, I believe sports are advantageous forworldpeace.Wewouldbewelladvisedtoadvocatetheprincipleoffriendshipinanysportseventfurther.

24、Nowadays, children play less with others and this has an impact ontheirdevelopment.Whatarethereasonsforthis?Doesithaveagoodorabadeffecton children?

Currently,juvenilestendtobealoneandlessofthemparticipateingroupactivities.Thisphenomenonhassparkledprevalentdebate.Inthisarticle,Iwillexploresomepossiblecauses of this phenomenon and then appraiseit.

There are several factors contribute to this situation. Firstly, the burgeoning technologyhaschanged life styles for adolescents. In past times, normally teenagers take part ingroupactivitiessuchasfootballandbasketballgamesforrecreationandentertainment.However,offering opportunities to play electronic games, cutting-edge technology enables childrentorelax themselves and do recreational activities alone nowadays. Secondly, as thecompetitionisbecomingincreasinglystiffamongteenagers,theyareobligedtospendmoretimeonacademic sessions and preparing the tests. Accordingly, the entertaining time for them todogroup activities is deducted. Moreover, the phenomenon that a vast of schoolssubstitutestheoreticcoursesforP.Elessonsaggravatestheproblem.

Personally,Ibelievethisphenomenonisdetrimentalandbanefulforthedevelopmentofteenagers.Foronething,groupactivitiesarethemosteffectivewayforteenagerstoworkout and strengthen their physique. It lays the foundation for their healthy growth. Iftheywere restricted from group activities, they would be susceptible to illness, obesity,overfatigue in the future. For another, having the opportunity to communicate withothers,children are capacitated to enhance their communication skills and teamwork ability bywayofgroupactivities.Fromthispointofview,lackingthecapacitytocoordinatewithothers,youngsterswouldlosetheircompetitivenesscomparedwithpeerswithoutgroupactivities.

Having considered all the arguments above, I am surely convinced less time forgroupactivities which stem from technology development and raising competitive pressure isdisadvantageoustothegrowthofadolescents.Thegovernmentswouldbewelladvisedtodotheir utmost to tackle thisproblem.

25、Inordertoimprovesafetyonourroadsmoreseverepunishmentshouldbeestablishedfordrivingoffenses.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagreewiththisstatement?

Currently, as the number of private vehicles is increasing remarkably, traffic safely hasbecomeasevereprobleminwholesociety.However,wouldstringentpenaltyforviolatingtrafficregulationsbeabeneficialwaytotacklethisproblemhassparkledprevalentdebate.Personally, I believe this measure is indispensable andfavorable.

Undeniably,thedrivingoffensessuchasjaywalkanddrunkdrivingarerampantincitiesisbecause the perpetrators believe they wouldn’t be punished. Under thiscircumstance,severe penalty is advantageous, no matter from the angle of governments andindividuals.Firstly, compared with criminal offence, the primary form of penalty for driving offence isfineand education. Receiving penal sum from the traffic offenders, the authoritiesarecapacitatedtoshiftmorefinancialresourcestodevelopthepublictransportationsystem,reducing the accident rate. Secondly, fearing the stringent penalty, mostpotentialperpetrators will not violate the traffic regulations and drive more scrupulously. Inthisrespect, severe punishment can be a deterrent for them. From this point of view, I believeifgovernment legislated against traffic problem with severe punishment, the number oftrafficoffenses would declinedramatically.

Admittedly, excessive discreet driving for fear of being punished can aggravate the trafficjamsometimes. Moreover, stringent measures maybe baneful for the impression build of anation to its citizens. However, even if stringent punishment had such perils, would therebeno points to implement it? By no means. For one thing, it is the drivers who buy privatecarswhich exacerbates the traffic safety problem. And it is justifiable for them to face up

therelevantobligationstoabidebythetrafficlaws.Foranother,asensiblegovernmentwillutilizethefinancialincomefromfinetoalleviatetrafficjam.

Having considered all the arguments above, I am surely convinced the advantages forseverepenaltyprevailoverthedisadvantageous.Theauthoritieswouldbewelladvisedtosticktostringent policy so as to tackle thisphenomenon.

26、Scientistsclaimthattheycantellwhetherachildwillbecomeacriminalbyexaminingthechildattheageof3.Doyouagreethatcrimeisaproductofhumannature? Do you think we can stop children from becomingcriminals?

Currently, as the population in cities has boosted remarkably, criminal behaviors isbecomingmoreandmorerampant.However,whethercriminaltendencyisanindividual’snaturethathehad it in childhood has sparkled prevalent debate. Personally, I believe the offences areprimarilyaffected by the environments rather than the innatefactor.

Undeniably, the majority of perpetrators commit crimes due to some special reasons. Theeffectof surrounding prevails over the personality from two angels. Firstly, as the proverb says, peopleareinherentlygood;everychilddoesn’thavecriminaltendencyandamalignantheart.Itisthegrowingenvironmentlikeschooling,parentingandsocietythatimpactstheirpersonalitiesandcharacters.Beinginfluencedsubtly,kidsmaychoosetocommitcrimesoncebeingtriggeredbyparticularconditionsinthefuture.Thefactthatlargemultitudesofofficialsareincarceratedbyembezzlement and abuse of authority although they have made remarkable contributiontosociety before is a case in points. Secondly, even if some children had the aptitude of offence,aslongastheygotproperdirectionandeducation,theywouldn’tgoastrayinthefuture.Itisbestexemplifiedwiththecasethatsomejuvenileoffendersarerehabilitatedafterdiscipline.Fromthere2respects,Iamconvincedthenatureisnotthedeterminantforcrime.

I believe we can take several measures to prevent children from committing crimes in thefuture.For schooling, they ought to substitute more morality sessions for academic lessons.Beingimparted the traditional virtues; juveniles tend to abide by the law after growing up.Forparenting, they ought to treat their kids more stringently and setting regulations for them.Givingpenalty to them once they violate the rules, parents have the capacity to rectify the undesirableattitudesandmisbehaviorsforthem.Forsociety,everycity-dwellerwouldbewelladvisedtoshoulder the obligations to advocate positive ethics and set themselves an example to childrentocomply with thestatues.

Having considered all the arguments above, I am surely convinced that nature is paleincomparisonwithenvironmentasaninfluencingfactortocrime.Moreover,tacklethisproblemneed the concerted efforts of allsociety.

27、 Thefunctionofprisonsispunishment;thereforelifeinprisonshouldbehard.To what extent do you agree ordisagree?

Currently, as the population in cities has boosted remarkably, criminal behaviors isbecomingmoreandmorerampant.Asaresult,avast

ofculpritsisincarcerated.However,shouldbeimprisoninglifebetoughhassparkledprevalentdebate.Personally,Ibelievethedisadvantagesprevail over the advantages for an arduous life injails.

Undeniably, increasing number of authorities have commenced to enhance the living conditionifprisons, especially for developed country. Better condition is helpful and essential, nomatterfromtheangelofmoralityandsociety.Firstly,beingpunishedbytheiroffences,theinmatesareimprisoned and have limited freedom from then on, which has already brought stringentpenaltytothem.Inaccordancewithhumanrights,evenwecan’tpermitthemtodoanythingatwilllikeanormal person; we should create a relative decent situation for them. It is unjustifiable forthemto be suffered on the basis that being restricted of freedom already. Secondly, a better conditionis beneficial for them to be rehabilitated. For instance, being offered opportunities toparticipatein recreation activities and various sessions, they are apt to repent for their crimesandexperience the concern of authorities. Oppositely, if they were treated atrociously in prison,theytended to hold a grudge against society. Under this circumstance, once they came back tosociety,it would be easy for them to revert tocrime.

Admittedly, normally tough experience in jails enables inmate to realize the severity ofthecriminal acts and remember that everyone would pay for their behaviors.Moreover, thefinancialresources are finite, it is not sensible to shift them to benefit the individuals who aredetrimentalto the society. However, even if it had such perils, would it be no points to offer culpritsadesirable condition? By no means. For one thing, the objective of incarcerating them is toreformthem rather than penalize them. Consequently, what the governments should focus on istoimprove the quality of education rather than treat them ferociously. For another,althoughauthorities use large amounts of capital to better their condition, they can encourage inmatestocreate fortune for thenation.

Having considered all the arguments above, I am surely convinced the tough situation in prisonisbanefultosociety.Also,itdoesn’taccordwithhumanrights.Ibelievetheauthoritieswouldbewelladvisedtoenhancethelivingconditionofculprits.

28、Somepeoplebelievethatteenagersshouldberequiredtodounpaidcommunityworkintheirfreetime.Thiscanbenefittheteenagersandthecommunityaswell.Do you agree or disagree? Give your ownopinion.

Currently, increasing number of schools motivate students to participate in some groupactivitiesandcommunityevents.However,thisphenomenonhassparkledprevalentdebate.Personally,Ibelieve the advantages prevail over thedisadvantages.

Undeniably, teenagers normally have already been able to do something to contribute tosociety.Carryingoutsomecommunityworksisbeneficialandessentialnomatterfromtheangleofsocietyorthemselves.Firstly,beingsupervisedprimarilybyvolunteers,avastofcommunitiessuffered from lacking manual labors to manage, especially in weekdays. Under thiscircumstance,the aids from juveniles benefits communities remarkably, rendering them be allocatedadequatelaborforce.Moreover,communityworksaretypicallysimpleassignments,suchaslookingafterseniorsandcleaning,whichadolescentscanhandleabsolutely.Secondly,ahostofcommunityworksenablestudentstoenhancetheabilitiesofteamwork,multi-taskanddetail-orientedwhichare favorable for their future career. Further speaking, feeling the cheerful mood afterhelpingothers, juveniles are capacitated to cultivate their personalities of taking pleasure ofaidingindividuals. In addition, they can get acquaint of numerous persons in community activities,whocan help them expend their socialexperiences.

Admittedly, in accordance with human rights, everyone possesses the power to choose their ownbehaviorinthepremiseofabidingbylaws.Also,ifadolescentsspentexcessivetimeonsocialwork, they would have less energy to tackle their study. Having said this, however, evenbeinginvolved in community work had such perils, would there be no points to do it? By no means.Forone thing, teenagers tend to be unreasonable and immature and they should be givendirectionsandguidetodosomethingratherthanletthemgounchecked.Foranother,academicrecordisnotthesolereferencepointtoappraiseastudentandwhatschoolsoughttodoisdevelopteenagers in all-round ways. By that I mean, morality and capability education is a significantpartofschooling.

Havingconsideredalltheargumentsabove,theinvolvementofcommunityworkdoesmoremerits than harms. It is positive for students themselves as well as the communities.Schoolswould be well advised to give incentive to juveniles to take part in social assignments as muchaspossible

29、Childrennowadayspreferelectronic/computergamestoothergamesandtoys.Whyis it happening? Is it a positive or a negativetrend?

Currently, as the technology is burgeoning, increasing number of children chooseelectronicgames instead of traditional toys for entertainment. However, this phenomenon hassparkledprevalent debate. In this article, I will explore some possible causes of this problem thenappraiseit.

There are several factors contribute to this situation. Firstly, computer games arebestcharacterized by intelligence, complexity, richness as well as entertainment. In this way, theyareabletomeetvariousdemandsforteenagers.Incontrast,normallytraditionalgameslikepuzzleand building block are monotonous and less intelligent. From this angle, they are paleincomparison with computer games. Secondly, kids are normally isolated from othersincontemporary society. Compared with past time, juveniles have less opportunity tocommunicateandplaywithothers.Beinglimitedbyspace,adolescentsnormallyhavenochoicebutdosomerecreationalactivitiesathomealone,suchasplayelectronicgames.Thirdly,havingimaginativeminds, children typically expect to play roles of heroes. Enabling them to act a character ingames,electronicgamesrendertheirdreamsmorevivid.Fromthispointofview,comparedtotraditionalgames,childrentendtofeellargersenseofachievementinelectronicgames.

Personally,Ibelievethisphenomenondoesmoreperilsthanmerits.Foronething,itisapttocultivateasedentarylifestyle,whichisdetrimentalforthephysiqueandhealthofchildren.Foranother, being inundated with pornographic and violent contents, some computer gamesarebaleful to the personality and character building. Moreover, adolescents are typicallysusceptibleto the fascinating plots of computer game. If they were preoccupied in it, they would beunlikelyto enhance their academic level. In this way, even if electronic games had some meritslikehelping children for relaxation, it wouldn’t be laudable for children to play themexcessively.

Havingconsideredalltheargumentsabove,Iamsurelyconvincedthedisadvantageousofthisphenomenon which caused by the change of lifestyle as well as the superiority andenchantmentof computer games themselves prevail over theadvantage.

30、Nowadays children have too much freedom. Do you agree ordisagree?

Currently, as the technology is burgeoning, juveniles have numerous ways forentertainment.However,ahostofpersonsreckonadolescentshaveexcessivelibertynowadays.Personally,Ibelieve this view isone-sided.

Undeniably,asthepopulationallovertheworldhasboostedremarkably,competitionamongpeers is becoming increasingly stiff. Free time for children to dominate is reduced than beforenomatter from the angle of schooling or parenting. For one thing, schools normallyhaveconsolidatedthecontrolforstudents,substitutingsportsandgameclassforacademicsessionsand prolonging time for leaving school. Being arranged more theoretic courses and lessgroupactivities, teenagers have less freedom in school. Moreover, it is common practice for teacherstodistributeheavyhomeworktostudents,renderingthemalmosthavenoextratimebutfinishhomework after school. For another, due to the mentality that expecting their kids has asplendidfuture;multitudesofparentstendtoregulatetheirchildren’sbehavior.Beingdeprivedofdoingwhatever they want, juveniles have to carry out something in accordance with the preferenceoftheir parents. Moreover, in order to enhance the learning level, numerous adolescentsarecompelledtoattendextracurricularclassesundertheorderoftheirparents.

Admittedly, the developing technology enriches the entertainment ways for children. Theyarecapacitatedtochoosevariousgamesforrecreation.Furthermore,someparentsspoiltheirkidsvery much, permitting them to do everything they desire. Having said this, even if suchfactsactually exist, would we get the conclusion that Children have excessive liberty? By nomeans.Firstly,althoughtheentertainmentwayshaveboosteddramatically,adolescentsnormallydon’thaveadequatetimetospendonitonaccountofthecontrolforschoolsandparents.Secondly,thephenomenonofspoilingkidsissmallprobabilityeventamongthewholesociety.BythatImean,theprimarystyleforparentstotreattheirkidsiscontrolandmonitoringratherthanletthemgo.

Havingconsideredalltheargumentsabove,Ibelievetheconclusionthatkidshavetoomuchfreedom is erroneous. Compared with before, I am surely convinced juveniles havemorelimitations.Thegovernmentswouldbewelladvisedtotacklethisproblem.

41.Somepeoplethinkthatdangeroussportsshouldbebanned,butothersthinkthepeopleshouldhavefreedomtochoosesportsactivities.Discussbothviewsandgiveyouropinion.

As the speedy development of human society, an increasing number of people commence totakeup the diversions of extreme sports like surfing and rock climbing. However, due to thepotentialhazardsofthesesports,shouldtheybeprohibitedstringentlyhassparkledprevalentdebate.Personally,Ibelievethesedangeroussportsarejustifiableandbeneficial.

Undeniably, expect doing something that was detrimental to other individuals’ benefits;citizenshavetheirlegitimaterightstochoosetheirbehaviorsandhobbies.Giventhefactthatsuchextremesportsdon’timposeperilstootherpersons,itiskindofunwarrantedtobanthemallovertheworld.Moreover,embodyingthepositivespiritssuchasperseveranceandchallengingthe limit of humankind, they ought to be advocated and givencompliments.

Secondly,itisanoverwhelmingsenseofmentalgratificationandovercomingdifficultiesthatextremesportsoffer,whichotherundertakingsevencan’tmanagetoreachacomparablelevel.BythatImean,goingaboutsuchsportsisanarduousprocessandfulfillingthemprovidesaverage beings a psychological satisfaction. In some extreme sports athletes’ idea, providedthattheywererefrainedfrombeingengagedinthesecommitments,theywouldfeeltheirlifelosesignificances.

Further speaking, evaluating such sports more deeply, you will discern they do more meritsthanharm. Admittedly, there are some potential hazards in extreme sports and even minimalmistakesgiverisetotragedy.However,knowingtheirlimitations,sensibleathletesareinclinedtoavoiddoing things which are beyond their abilities. In contrast besides the latent perils, extremesportscapacitatepeopletohoneupall-roundabilitieslikestrengthandendurance,cultivatingtheirspiritssuchasconscientiousnessandpersistenceaswell.

Havingconsideredalltheargumentabove,Iamconvincedthatextremesportswhichpossessahostofadvantagesshouldbeencouragedratherthanrestrict.However,forpeople,theywouldbewell-advisedtobemorediscreetandrationaltoselecttheirdiversionsofextremesports.

42.Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be neededbecausepeople can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agreeordisagree with thisopinion

Currently, with the popularization of the internet, human beings are able to seemostartworks as wells as antiques by pressing the mouse. In this way, some individualsassertthat museums and galleries are redundant in contemporary society. Personally, Ibelievethis opinion isabsurd.

Undoubtedly,nomatterhowcleartheartworkslookincomputer,theyarejustimagesandpicturesratherthantherealobjects.Theexistenceofmuseumsisbeneficialnomatterfrom the angle of visitors or works of art. Firstly, compared with just viewing thepicturesbycomputers,seeingthesemasterpiecesinrealorevenbeingpermittedtotouchthembyfingertips,peopletendtogetabettercomprehensionandfeelingtothem.Inthisway,such public facilities can offer a gratifying experience to every visitor and computersarepaleincomparisonwithmuseumsfromthatpoint.Secondly,displayinginmuseums,theseartworks and historical objects can get desirable preservation and maintenance.Charginga little fee from every visitor, museums are empowered to arrange adequatemanpowerand material resources to keep and exhibit them. Oppositely, if artworks were justtakenphotos and showed in the internet, they might be damaged because oflackingmaintenance, which would be a tremendous loss to allmankind.

Admittedly, computers and the internet brought significant convenience toindividuals.Moreover, it is better for visitors to scan some information on the internet to get aroughoverviewoftheseartworks. However,evenifcomputerhadsuchmerits,woulditcantakeplace of the function of museum completely? By no means. Viewing the pictures onlineisabsolutely different with seeing by your own eyes on site and feeling it by yourheart.

Havingconsideredalltheargumentabove,Iamconvincedthatthefunctionalityofmuseums and galleries can’t be substituted by computers at all. Authorities would bewelladvisedtoadvocatecitizenstovisitsuchpublicfacilitiesratherthanjustscantheinternet.

43. Somepeoplethinkzoosarecruelandallthezoosshouldbeclosed.However,somepeoplethinkzoosareusefultoprotectthe rareanimals.Discussboththeseviewsandgiveyouropinion.

In the current society, we have much access to knowing different animals. Visiting the zoo isoneof the convenient ways. However, there is an increasing debate about whether the zoo shouldbeestablished ,and be opened to the public. Different people have comparableopinions.

Somepeoplethinkzoosarehorrible,anditisunfairtoanimals.Theythinkourgovernmentshouldclosethezoo.Themostimportantreasonisthatanimalsbelongtonature,andzoosarenottheirrealhome.Andinsomeway,livinginzoosiscrucialtoanimals.Withtimegoesby,theywill lose their fundamental skills which are essential to adapting to wildenvironment.Asreported,some animals that spending a long time on zoos finally died,because of not adaptingtothenaturallifeagain.Weknowthatsomeanimalsarelivingbygroups,buttheyareclosedbyseparate ways in the zoo.Animals have their own living ,and we should not forbidit.

Although some people think we should close the zoo,others have different ideas.They thinkzoosare useful to protect the rare animals,and it provides animals a safe place.Firstly,many people arekilling precious wild animals to obtain more money.We can see that the number of rare animalsisdecreasing from many news.Zoos are good places to hold back illegalactions.Secondly,theenvironment has suffered from pollution,and some animals are losing their

previoushome.Zoosaregoodchoicestothoseanimals.So,thezooisreallyabetterplacetoprotectanimals.

Thosetwoopinionsareallcorrect,butIthinkweshouldnotcloseallzoosintoday.Wecandevelopeourzoos'facilitiestoimproveanimals'livingenvironment,andletthemfeelthatzoosare familiar to wild environment.We can also training animals through natural methods,sotheycanadapttonaturesuccessfully.Allinall,closingthezooisnotaneffectiveway,whatweshoulddo is developing the zoo'senvironment.

44. Working conditions today are not the same as before and people no longer rely on takingonejobforlife.Discussthepossiblecausesofthesechangesandgiveyoursuggestionsonhowpeople should prepare for work in thefuture

The world is changing rapidly,so is the world of work, where working conditions have improvedalot.Itisnotrarethatapersonchangeshisjobfromtimetotime,quittingwhatheperceivestobethelessrewardingjobforanewone.This,asfarasIamconcerned,canbeascribedtothefollowingcauses.

First of all, the shift of the traditional concept of work is responsible for ones’ frequent changeofjobs.Inthepast,peoplewereimbuedwiththeideathatoneshouldtakeasinglejoballhislifeandtheyveryoftendidso.Thistraditionalnotion,however,israpidlyevaporating.Peoplegive

priority to the pay and the long－term reward of the work, thus rendering it a normal practiceto quit a job when they find itunsatisfactory.

Anotherfactorleadingtothefactthatonenolongerreliesonasinglejobforlifeiscompetitioninmodernsociety.Today,theworldofworkisonerepletewithcompetition,which,asweallknow,produceswinnersandlosers.Whenapersonisdefeatedinthiskindofcompetition,heissacked and has to hunt for a newjob.

In face of the intense competition, one has to be well prepared, psychologicallyandtechnologically, for work in the future. For one thing, one has to realize that changing ones jobis,and will be, a common practice. This awareness may well help one to keep buoyantwhendismissedfromhisposition.Foranother,towinthecompetition,onehastobewellequippedtechnologically.Successinthecompetitionlargelyrestsononescompetenceinwork,which,obviously, comes from his expertise, his mastery of relevant scientific andtechnologicalknowledge. Only when properly geared for competition can one expect to be a constantwinner.

45、Somepeoplethinkthatmenandwomenhavedifferentqualities.Therefore,somecertainjobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extent do you agreeordisagree?

Currently,astheconceptofgenderequalityiswidelyadvocatedinsociety,thephenomenonofgenderdiscriminationhasdeclinedconsiderably.However,therearestillsomejobswhichareexclusive to certain gender. Under this circumstance, whether certain gender has superioritythananother for certain career has sparkled prevalentdebate.

Undeniably, in respect of multitudes of careers, supervisors tend to recruit employee ofspecificgender. It is irrefutable that male and female are born with different attributes. On the one

hand,womenbeatmanincharm.Womenaresuperiortomenincaringandnurturingandotherjobsrelatedtodomesticity.Becauseoftheircharm,theyaremoreoftenthannotcapableofusingmen to do what they want For example, in the fields of administrative and secretarialworkplace,females outnumber males about four to one. On the other hand, strength favors menthanwomen. Men have traditionally been viewed as the breadwinners or workers due totheirstrength.Themacho-imageisactiveandaggressive.Somejobsmayexclusivelybelongtomen.On the other hand, passive and charming, women need not apply for such jobs as miners,sailors,firefighters,ironsmithsorevenbutchers.

Admittedly, numerous careers don’t have gender preference at all. Especially for some jobswhichrequire less physical quality but more intelligence and leadership such as president orprincipals,male and female have showed equal opportunities. Furthermore, almost every individual isableto make up the defect of gender by way of practicing and learning. Having said this, even ifgenderwasnotthedeterminantofjobrecruitment,wouldwegettheconclusionthatgenderisn’taninfluencingfactoratall?Bynomeans.Besidesthedistinctionofphysicalquality,femaleand male have apparent differences in characters. For instance, women are typicallymorescrupulousthanmen.Itbestillustratesthatwhymostenterprisespreferwomentoworkinfinance department such asaccountant.

Havingconsideredalltheargumentsabove,Iamsurelyconvincedthatcertaingenderismorefavorable to some specific jobs. Moreover, compared with careers of brain work, jobs ofphysicalwork rely more on gender.

本文来源：https://www.bwwdw.com/article/ysua.html