径行裁判论文：我国民事诉讼径行裁判制度研究

径行裁判论文：我国民事诉讼径行裁判制度研究

【中文摘要】径行裁判制度颇具中国特色。它是作为我国民事诉讼二审开庭审判方式的例外而存在的。当公正与效率成为二十一世纪司法的永恒主题,如何缓解当前法院案多人少的困境,并探求一套合法、快捷的审判程序便成了我国新时期司法工作的重中之重。应该说,我国民事诉讼径行裁判制度的确立能够在一定程度上缓解当前司法实践中上诉法院的诉讼压力,在提高民事诉讼效率方面具有无可比拟的作用。然而,尽管径行裁判制度在我国由来已久,但从我国当前民事诉讼法及其司法解释等相关立法规定看,径行裁判制度显然没有受到应有的重视。而立法的粗糙也直接导致了径行裁判在司法实践适用中的混乱。本文尝试从径行裁判的相关价值理念入手,通过对我国当前径行裁判制度的立法、司法运作现状及其原因进行剖析,并在此基础上提出相关完善建议,在程序保障和诉讼效率之间寻求最佳路径,从而构建最适合我国国情的径行裁判制度。作者首先从民事诉讼径行裁判制度的相关法理出发,通过对民事诉讼径行裁判制度的涵义、特征以及与相关概念的的辨析等进行描述,从而发现我国民事诉讼径行裁判制度的意义和价值。其次,文章也比较深入的对当前我国民事诉讼径行裁判制度的立法、司法现状及其原因进行了剖析。通过对我国当前民事诉讼径行裁判制度立法、司法现状的描述,指出径行裁判制度存在的问题并对造成该问题的原因进行详细的探讨与分析。最后针对我国当前民事诉讼径行裁判制度存在的缺陷与不足,试提出对我国民

事诉讼径行裁判制度的完善建议。从对我国民事诉讼径行裁判制度的废除与否展开,提出对其保留之意义。在程序保障与诉讼效率的路径选择之间,有针对性地对径行裁判立法与司法实践中存在的种种问题,从完善程序规则、明确适用标准以及给予当事人复议救济等几个方面提出了完善我国民事诉讼径行裁判制度的立法建议。

【英文摘要】The immediate judgment system is existed as the exception of the trial mode of the second instance of the civil litigation in our country. With justice and efficiency becoming the themes of judicature in the 21st century, how to alleviate the antinomy between the large quantity of cases and the little judicial resources as well as search a legitimate and faster trial procedure become the most important things of judicature in the new period in our country. Although the immediate judgment system exists for a long time, people don’t pay attention to it which we can see from the rules concerned such as the present civil procedure law and judicial interpretation. Furthermore, the rough of lawmaking directly causes confusion in the immediate judgment procedure in practice. In this paper, we start with the value concept related to the immediate judgment, then try to find a best way to balance procedural protection and litigation efficiency by the analysis of the lawmaking, judicial condition and reason of the present

immediate judgment system, thus to build up the immediate judgment system which is the most suitable for China’s national conditions.Firstly, we start with the legal theory of the civil litigation immediate judgment system, and then describe the concept and characteristic of the immediate judgment system as well as the discrimination of its concerned concept, thereby finding the significance and the value of the immediate judgment system.Secondly, we further analyze the lawmaking, judicial condition and reason of the present civil litigation immediate judgment system of our country. By the description of the lawmaking and judicial condition of the present civil litigation immediate judgment system, we point out the problems of the immediate judgment system, then discuss and analyze the reason for these problems in detail.Thirdly, we propose suggestions to try to improve the civil litigation immediate judgment system of our country based on the defect of this system. We discuss whether to abolish the civil litigation immediate judgment system or not to show the significance of keeping this system. Then according to the problems in lawmaking and judicial practice of immediate judgment and the way of balancing procedural protection and litigation efficiency, we suggest to improve the civil litigation

immediate judgment system by improving the rules of procedure, defining the applicable standards and giving the parties reconsideration relief.

【关键词】径行裁判 程序公正 诉讼效率

【英文关键词】The civil immediate judgment Procedural justice Litigation efficiency

【目录】我国民事诉讼径行裁判制度研究4-5

Abstract5

引言8-9

摘要

第1章 径行裁判的一

1.1.1 1.2 径

般考察9-171.1 径行裁判的概念与特征9-10

1.1.2 径行裁判的特征9-10

径行裁判的概念9

行裁判与相近制度辨析10-1210-11

1.2.1 径行裁判与书面审理

11-12

1.2.3 径行

1.2.2 径行裁判与简易程序

裁判与即决判决1212-17

1.3 径行裁判制度的定位

12-13

1.3.2 径行

1.3.1 径行裁判的性质定位

裁判的价值定位13-1616-1717-2517-21

1.3.3 径行裁判的功能定位

第2章 我国民事诉讼径行裁判制度的立法与实践2.1 径行裁判制度立法的现状与问题2.1.1 径行裁判制度的立法现状17-19

2.1.2

径行裁判制度在立法上存在的问题19-21的实践运作及其弊端情况21-2323-25

21-25

2.2 径行裁判制度

2.2.1 径行裁判制度的实际运作

2.2.2 径行裁判制度在实践中的弊端及原因分析第3章 完善我国民事诉讼径行裁判制度的建议

25-35除论25-2626-2727-2927-28

3.1 关于径行裁判的存废之争25-27

3.1.2 保留论26

3.1.1 废

3.1.3 径行裁判应予保留

3.2 正确确定径行裁判制度的价值取向3.2.1 程序公正27

3.2.2 诉讼效率

3.3 明

3.2.3 径行裁判制度的价值选择28-29

确径行裁判的适用标准29-3030-3230-31

3.4 完善径行裁判的审理程序

3.4.1 落实径行裁判的审判组织形式3.4.2 径行裁判审理程序之完善31

3.5 径行裁判的复议救济

3.5.2 完3.4.3 径行

裁判之程序回转31-3232-34

3.5.1 赋予当事人径行裁判救济权32

善径行裁判复议的运行程序32-33裁判复议权利33-3434-3538-39

3.5.3 保障当事人的径行

3.6 加强对径行裁判的检察监督

参考文献

36-38

致谢

结语35-36

在学期间发表的学术论文与研究成果39

本文来源：https://www.bwwdw.com/article/yc53.html