Testing Mass Varying Neutrino With Short Gamma Ray Burst

更新时间:2023-08-20 08:14:01 阅读量: 高等教育 文档下载

说明:文章内容仅供预览,部分内容可能不全。下载后的文档,内容与下面显示的完全一致。下载之前请确认下面内容是否您想要的,是否完整无缺。

In this paper we study the possibility of probing for the absolute neutrino mass and its variation with short Gamma Ray Burst (GRB). We have calculated the flight time difference between a massive neutrino and a photon in two different approaches to mass v

TestingMassVaryingNeutrinoWithShortGammaRayBurst

InstituteofHighEnergyPhysics,ChineseAcademyofSciences,

P.O.Box918-4,Beijing100049,P.R.Chinaand

b

DepartmentofAstronomy,NanjingUniversity,Nanjing210093,P.R.China

Inthispaperwestudythepossibilityofprobingfortheabsoluteneutrinomassandits

variationwithshortGammaRayBurst(GRB).Wehavecalculatedthe ighttimedi erencebetweenamassiveneutrinoandaphotonintwodi erentapproachestomassvaryingneutrinos.Firstlyweparametrizetheneutrinomassasafunctionofredshiftinamodelindependentway,thenweconsidertwospeci cmodelswheretheneutrinomassvariesduringtheevolutionoftheQuintessence elds.Ourcalculationsshowingeneralthevalueofthetimedelayischangedsubstantiallyrelativetoaconstantneutrinomass.Furthermoreournumericalresultsshowthatthe ighttimedelayinthesemodelsisexpectedtobelargerthanthedurationtimeoftheshortGRB,whichopensapossibilityoftestingthescenarioofmassvaryingneutrinowiththeshortGRB.

a

HongLia, ZigaoDaib,andXinminZhanga

arXiv:hep-ph/0411228v1 17 Nov 2004

IntherecentyearsastronomicalobservationsshowthattheUniverseisspatiallyacceleratingatthepresenttime[1].Thesimplestaccountofthiscosmicaccelera-tionseemstobearemnantsmallcosmologicalconstant,butitsu ersfromthedi cultiesassociatedwiththe netuningandcoincidenceproblem,somanyphysicistsareattractedwiththeideathattheaccelerationisdrivenbydynamicalscalar elds,suchasQuintessence.Inmodelsofdarkenergywitharemnantsmallcosmologicalcon-4

stantor(trueorfalse)vacuumenergyρ~(2×10 3ev).Thisenergyscale~10 3evissmallerthantheenergyscalesinparticlephysics,butinterestinglyiscompara-bletotheneutrinomasses.Thisindicatesapossibleconnectionbetweentheneutrinosandthedarkenergy.Furthermore,inQuintessence-likemodelsmQ~10 33eV,whichsurprisinglyisalsoconnectedtotheneutrinomassesviaasee-sawformulamQ~m2ν/MplwithMpltheplanckmass.

Istherereallyanyconnectionsbetweentheneutrinosanddarkenergy?Giventheargumentsaboveitisquiteinterestingtomakesuchaspeculationonthisconnec-tion.Ifyes,howeverintermsofthelanguageoftheparticlephysicsitrequirestheexistenceofnewdynam-icsandnewinteractionsbetweentheneutrinoandthedarkenergysector.Recentlytherearesomestudiesintheliteratureonthepossiblerealizationofthemodelsonneutrinosanddarkenergy[2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11].Oneoftheinterestingpredictionsofthesemodels[12]isthatneutrinomassesarenotconstant,butvaryasafunc-tionoftimeduringtheevolutionoftheuniverse.Inthispaperwestudythepossibilityoftestingthisscenarioofmassvaryingneutrinoswiththegammarayburst.Therearestrongevidencesforthenon-vanishingneu-trinomassesfromtheneutrinooscillationexperiments,howevertheneutrinomassesgivenbythesolarneutri-nosandatmosphereneutrinosexperimentsarenotthe

~absolutevalues,butmasssquaredi erence: m2

2

m22

m2

(1+

z′)2H

In this paper we study the possibility of probing for the absolute neutrino mass and its variation with short Gamma Ray Burst (GRB). We have calculated the flight time difference between a massive neutrino and a photon in two different approaches to mass v

thetdonewouldbeabletodeterminetheabsolutevalueoftheneutrinomass,howeveringeneralsincethepho-tonsaretrappedinsidethe reballandarereleasedmuchlater,theneutrinoandthephotonwillnotbeemittedatthesametime.Thiswilladdansystematicerrorinthemeasurementofthetd,consequentlyanuncertaintyinthedeterminationoftheneutrinomasses.ToreducethistypeofsystematicerrorwefocusontheshortGRBwhosedurationisgenerallylessthan2secondsorevenmuchshorter,ForexampleBurstAndTransientSourceExperiment(BATSE)

hasdiscoveredaGRBwithdura-tiononly5milliseconds[22].IthasbeenwidelyarguedthatshortGRBsareproducedbythemergeroftwocom-pactobjects(e.g.,neutronstarsorblackholes)[23],andthattheirenvironmentsarelikelytobelow-densitymediabecausethemergingplaceisfarawayfromthebirthsiteofoneneutronstar.Evenso,thepredictedafterglowsfromshortGRBsappeartobedetectablewithcurrentinstrumentsintheSwiftera[24].Oncesuchafterglowsaredetected,theredshiftsofshortGRBsmaybemea-sured.

FromFig.1onecanseethatingeneralthetimedelaytdislongerthanthedurationoftheshortGRB.Forexampleform=0.6eV,z=2,p=10Mev,tdisaround400seconds;especiallyfortheGRB030329withredshiftz=0.17,tdis112seconds.Thetimedelayforthesecasesisexpectedtobedetectableinprinciple.Ifnot,thiswillputalimitontheabsolutevalueoftheneutrinomassbetterthanthecosmologicallimits.

t

p eV

FIG.1:td(unitinsecond)asafunctionofpfordi erentred-shiftsz=0.17(solid),0.5(dashed),1(dotted),2(dashdotted).

Inthefollowingwewilldiscussthepossibilityoftest-ingonthevariationoftheneutrinomasseswiththeshortGRB.Firstofallweparametrizethevariationoftheneu-trinomassinamodelindependentway,thenwewilltaketwoconcretemodelsofQuintessenceforthecalculationofmassvariationandthetimedelayoftheneutrinos.Considerageneralcasewheremνisanarbitraryfunc-tionoftheredshiftZ,i.e.m(Z),onecanexpanditintermsofredshiftz.Forsmallz,weget:

m(Z)=m0+m′Z+

1

2

mZ+...).(3)

De ningc≡

m′(0)

m202

(1+z′)2H0

p

.Notethathere

theneutrinomassin(5)variesasafunctionofredshiftz.FromFig.2onecanseethatthevariationofthe

t

z=0.3

z=0.05

m/p

FIG.2:td(unitinsecond)asafunctionof

m0

f

ννφφ+h.c.,(6)

andmν~

v2

2Mpl

1+β

Q0

M),(8)

pl

In this paper we study the possibility of probing for the absolute neutrino mass and its variation with short Gamma Ray Burst (GRB). We have calculated the flight time difference between a massive neutrino and a photon in two different approaches to mass v

wherem0andQ0aretheneutrinomassandthevalueofQuintessenceatpresenttime,andMplisthePlankscale.Nowtheformulaforthetime-delayisgivenby

t1d=p)21M2pl)

t0

(1+β

Q

tQ

˙23

(ρB+

3

inradiation-dominatedandωB=0in

thematter-dominatedUniverse.

Foranumericalstudy,weconsideramodelofQuintessencewithainversepower-lawpotential[25],

V=V0Q α.

(13)

Thistypeofmodelisshown[25,26]tohavethepropertyoftrackingbehavior.Inthecalculationwetakeα=0.5whichgivesrisetoωQ0< 0.78constrainedbytheWMAP.InFig.3weplotthenumericalvalueoftd.FromFig.3onecanseethetimedelaytdisenhanced

t

z=3

z=0.17

m/p

FIG.3:Plotoftd(unitinsecond)asafunctionof

m0

p

)2~10 7,andβ= 3,tdcan

reach1624secondsatz=3.Forcomparisonaconstantneutrinomassβ=0reducestdto1075seconds.

Forthecaseofhierarchicalneutrinomasspatter,theheavyneutrinomasssetbytheatmosphareneutrinoos-cillationism~0.05eV.Withthisvalueonecanseefrom

3

Fig.3thattdisonly0.5secondsfortheconstant-mass

neutrinoswithenergyp=12Mevandredshiftz=3.ThisvalueismuchsmallerthantheshortGRBdurationandwillbedi culttobeobservable.Iftheneutrinomassvaries,asshowninFig.3tdwillbeenhancedsubstan-tially.NumericallyFig.3showsthattdcanbeincreasedto3seconds.

CertainlytheresultsshowninFig.3dependsontheQuintessencemodel.Foranillustration,weconsideranotherQuintessencemodel

V=V0exp(

λ

p

.The

threecurvescorrespondtoparametersβ=0(solid),-2(dash),10(dot)respectivelyforagivenredshift.

Insummarywehaveinthispaperdiscussedthepossi-bilityofusingtheShortGRBtoprobefortheabsoluteneutrinomassesanditsvariation.Byadetailedcalcu-lationwehaveshownthatwiththecurrentcosmologicallimitsonthedegeneratedneutrinomassesthetimedelaytdwillbeingenerallongerthanthetimeoftheduration,furthermorethechangestothetdcausedbythevariationoftheneutrinomassesarealsoexpectedtobelargerthanthetimeoftheduration.Ourresultsindicatethepossi-bilityoftestingthescenarioofmassvaryingneutrinointhefutureneutrinotelescope.

Acknowledgments:WeareindebtedtoDrs.MinzheLi,BoFengandXiaojunBiforenlighteningdiscussionsandProfs.RobertoPeccei,SandipPakvasaandDr.HeinrichPaesforreadingthemanuscript.WethankDr.NanLiangforhelpfuldiscussionsonGRBs.ThisworkwassupportedinpartbyNationalNaturalScienceFoundationofChina(grantNos.90303004,19925523,10233010and10221001)andbyMinistryofScienceandTechnologyofChina(underGrantNo.NKBRSFG19990754).

In this paper we study the possibility of probing for the absolute neutrino mass and its variation with short Gamma Ray Burst (GRB). We have calculated the flight time difference between a massive neutrino and a photon in two different approaches to mass v

[1]S.Pemutteretal.,Astrophys.J.483,565(1997);Adam

G.Riessetal.,Astrophys.J.116,1009(1998).

[2]MingzheLi,XiulianWang,BoFeng,XinminZhang,

Phys.Rev.D65,103511(2002);hep-ph/0112069.

[3]MingzheLi,XinminZhang,Phys.Lett.B573,20(2003);

hep-ph/0209093.

[4]P.Q.Hung,hep-ph/0010126.Thispaperconsidersthe

interactionbetweentheQuintessenceandthesterilneu-trinos.

[5]PeihongGu,XiulianWang,XinminZhang,Phys.Rev.

D68,087301(2003);hep-ph/0307148.[6]RobFardon,AnnE.Nelson,NealWeiner,

astro-ph/0309800.

[7]Xiao-JunBi,Pei-hongGu,Xiu-lianWang,Xin-min

Zhang,Phys.Rev.D69,113007(2004);hep-ph/0311022.[8]PhamQuangHung,HeinrichPas,astro-ph/0311131.[9]DavidB.Kaplan,AnnE.Nelson,NealWeiner,Phys.

Rev.Lett.93,091801(2004);hep-ph/0401099.[10]R.D.Peccei,hep-ph/0404277.[11]R.D.Peccei,hep-ph/0411137.[12]XinminZhang,hep-ph/0410292.[13]Forreviews,see:BorisKayser,hep-ph/0306072;

PaulLangacker,hep-ph/0411116;R.N.Mohapatra,hep-ph/0411131;Y.F.Wang,hep-ex/0411028.[14]M.Tegmarketal.,astro-ph/0310723.

[15]S.PakvasaandK.Tennakone,Phys.Rev.Lett.28,

1415(1972);T.J.Weiler,W.A.Simmons,S.PakvasaandJ.G.Learned,hep-ph/9411432.

[16]S.ChoubeyandS.F.King,Phys.Rev.D67,

073005(2003);L.Stodolsky,Phys.Lett.B47361(2000).[17]F.HalzenandG.Jaczko,Phys.Rev.D54,2779(1996);

4

J.Alvarez-Muniz,F.Halzen,andD.W.Hooper,Phys.Rev.D62,093015(2000).

[18]

Lee,W.H.,&Ramirez-Ruiz,E.,ApJ,577,893(2002);Rosswog,S.,&Ramirez-Ruiz,E.,MNRAS,345,1077(2003);Stanek,K.Z.etal.,ApJ,591,L17(2003);Zhang,B.,&M´esz´aros,P.,Int.J.Mod.Phys.A,inpress,astro-ph/0311321.

[19]N.Gupta,Phys.Rev.D65,113005(2002).

[20]E.Nardi,astro-ph/0401624;J.M.Horack,A.G.EmslieandC.A.Meegan,APJ426,L5(1994).

[21]

Hjorth,J.etal.,Nature423,847(2003);Kouveliotou,C.etal.,ApJ413,L101(1993);Narayan,R.,Paczy´nski,B.,&Piran,T.,ApJ395,L8(1992);Ru ert,M.etal.,A&A319,122(1997);Daietal.,ApJ,612,L101(2004);Ghirlandaetal.,ApJ,613,L13(2004).

[22]BhatPN,FishmanGJ,MeeganCAetal,Nature359217(1992).

[23]

Narayan,R.,Paczynski,B.,&Piran,T.,ApJ,395,L8(1992);Ru ert,M.etal.,A&A,319,122(1997);Rosswog,S.,Ramirez-RuizE.,&Davies,M.B.,astro-ph/0306418.

[24]

Panaitescu,A.,Kumar,P.,&Narayan,R.,ApJ,561,L171(2002);Li,Z.,Dai,Z.G.,&Lu,T.,MNRAS,345,1236(2003);Fan,Y.Z.,Zhang,B.,Kobayashi,S.,&Meszaros,P.,astro-ph/0410060.

[25]B.RatraandP.J.E.Peebles,Phys.Rev.D37,3406(1988).

[26]

I.Zlatev,L.Wang,andP.J.Steinhardt,Phys.Rev.Lett.82,896(1999);P.J.Steinhardt,L.WangandI.Zlatev,Phys.Rev.D59,123504(1999).

本文来源:https://www.bwwdw.com/article/nn3j.html

Top