2016浙江宁波市高考英语二轮：阅读理解精炼(1)答案

2016浙江宁波市高考英语二轮：阅读理解精炼（1）答案 2016高考英语阅读理解--历史类

It’s the worst event in human being’s nautical（航海的）history , six times more deadly than the Titanic . When the German cruise ship Wilhelm Gustloff was hit by torpedoesfired from （鱼雷）a Russian submarine in the final winter of World War II , more than 10,000 people – mostly women , children and old people fleeing the final Red Army push into Nazi Germany – were packed aboard . An ice storm had turned the decks into frozen sheets that sent hundreds of families sliding into the sea as the ship tilted and began to go down . Others desperately tried to put lifeboats down . Some who succeeded fought off those in the water who had the strength to try to claw their way aboard . Most people froze immediately . “ I’ll never forget the screams , ” says Christa Ntitzmann , 87 , one of the 1,200 survivors . She recalls watching the ship , brightly lit , slipping into its dark grave-and into seeming nothingness , rarely mentioned for more than half a century . Now Germany’s Nobel Prize-winning author Gtinter Grass has revived the memory of the 9,000 dead , including more than 4,000 children-with his latest novel Crab Walk , published last month . The book ,which will be out in English next year , doesn’t dwell on the sinking : its heroine is a pregnant young woman who survives the catastrophe only to say later : “ Nobody wanted to hear about it , not here in the West ( of Germany ) and not at all in the East . ”

The reason was obvious . As Grass put in a recent interview with the weekly Die Woche : “ Because the crimes we Germans are responsible for were and are so dominant , we didn’t have the energy left to tell of our own sufferings . ” The long silence about the sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff was probably unavoidable – and necessary .

By unreservedly owning up to their country’s monstrous crimes in the Second World War , Germans have managed to win acceptance abroad , marginalize the neo-Nazis at home and make peace with their neighbors .

Today’s unified Germany is more prosperous and stable than at any time in its long , troubled history . For that , a half century of willful forgetting about painful memories like the German Titanic was perhaps a reasonable price to pay . But even the most politically correct Germans believe that they’ve now earned the right to discuss the full historical record . Not to equate German suffering with that of its victims , but simply to acknowledge a terrible tragedy . 【小题1】Why does the author say the sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff was the worst event in

nautical history ?

A．It was attacked by Russian torpedoes . B．Most of its passengers were frozen to death . C．Its victims were mostly women and children . D．It caused the largest number of casualties .

【小题2】How does Gunter Grass revive the memory of the Wilhelm Gustloff tragedy ? A．By presenting the horrible scene of the torpedo attack . B．By describing the ship’s sinking in great detail . C．By giving an interview to the weekly Die Woche . D．By illustrating the survival of a young pregnant woman .

【小题3】What’s the meaning of the underlined word “ marginalize ” A．highlight C．strengthen

B．weaken D．fasten

【小题4】It can be learned from the passage that Germans no longer think that A．they will be misunderstood if they talk about the Wilhelm Gustloff tragedy

B．the Wilhelm Gustloff tragedy is a reasonable price to pay for the nation’s past misdeeds C．Germany is responsible for the horrible crimes it committed in World War II D．it is wrong to equate their sufferings with those of other countries

2016高考英语阅读理解--历史类

Getting rid of dirt, in the opinion of most people, is a good thing. However, there is nothing fixed about attitudes to dirt.

In the early 16th century, people thought that dirt on the skin was a means to block out

disease, as medical opinion had it that washing off dirt with hot water could open up the skin and let ills in. A particular danger was thought to lie in public baths. By 1538, the French king had closed the bath houses in his kingdom. So did the king of England in 1546. Thus began a long time when the rich and the poor in Europe lived with dirt in a friendly way. Henry IV, King of France, was famously dirty. Upon learning that a nobleman had taken a bath, the king ordered that, to avoid the attack of disease, the nobleman should not go out.

Though the belief in the merit of dirt was long-lived, dirt has no longer been regarded as a nice neighbor ever since the 18th century. Scientifically speaking, cleaning away dirt is good to health. Clean water supply and hand washing are practical means of preventing disease. Yet, it seems that standards of cleanliness have moved beyond science since World War Ⅱ. Advertisements repeatedly sell the idea: clothes need to be whiter than white, cloths ever softer, surfaces to shine. Has the hate for dirt, however, gone too far?

Attitudes to dirt still differ hugely nowadays. Many first-time parents nervously try to warn their children off touching dirt, which might be responsible for the spread of disease.On the contrary, Mary Ruebush, an American immunologist(免疫学家)，encourages children to play in the dirt to build up a strong immune system. And the latter position is gaining some ground.

th

【小题1】The kings of France and England in the 16 century closed bath houses because .

A．they lived healthily in a dirty environment.

B．they believed disease could be spread in public baths C．they thought bath houses were too dirty to stay in D．they considered bathing as the cause of skin disease

【小题2】Which of the following best describes Henry IV’s attitude to bathing? A．Approving. C．Curious

B．Afraid.. D．Uninterested.

【小题3】How does the passage mainly develop? A．By providing examples. B．By making comparisons. C．By following the order of time. D．By following the order of importance.

【小题4】What is the author’s purpose in writing the passage?

A．To stress the role of dirt. B．To introduce the history of dirt. C．To call attention to the danger of dirt. D．To present the change of views on dirt.

阅读下面短文，掌握其大意，从每题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中，选出最佳选项 。 In a few years, you might be able to speak Chinese, Korean, Japanese, French, and English—and all at the same time. This sounds incredible, but Alex Waibel, a computer science professor at US’s Carnegie Mellon University(CMU)and Germany’s University of Karlsruhe, announced last week that it may soon be a reality. He and his team have invented software and hardware that could make it far easier for people who speak different languages to understand each other.

One application, called Lecture Translation, can easily translate a speech from one language into another. Current translation technologies typically limit speakers to certain topics or a limited vocabulary. Users also have to be trained how to use the programme.

Another prototype (雏形机)can send translations of a speech to different listeners depending on what language they speak. “It is like having a simultaneous translator right next to you but without disturbing the person next to you,”Waibel said.

Prefer to read? So-called Translation Glasses transcribe (转录) the translations on a tiny liquid-crystal (液晶) display(LCD)screen.

Then there’s the Muscle Translator. Electrodes capture the electrical signals from facial muscle movements made naturally when a person is mouthing words. The signals are then translated into speech. The electrodes could be replaced with wireless chips implanted in a person’s face, according to researchers.

本文来源：https://www.bwwdw.com/article/hmf.html