毕业设计文献翻译 - 图文
更新时间:2023-10-31 12:43:01 阅读量: 综合文库 文档下载
- 毕业设计文献翻译格式推荐度:
- 相关推荐
1 Introduction
1.1 DNA and Ru(bpy)2dppz2+
Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ is an organometallic molecule (Figure 1.1), centered around a Ru atom bound with three ligands, whose one of them dipyridophenazine (dppz) allow for its strong interaction with DNA: it intercalates between DNA base pair. It exhibits the unique property of being luminescent when intercalation occurs. As a consequence, it plays an important role in exploring the structure and properties of DNA. It can be seen as a reporter of DNA structure, so it is very interesting to study on the interaction between the Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ and DNA.
Firstly, a general overview of DNA, structure and physical properties, is presented in the introductory part. Secondly, complexation of ruthenium and DNA is introduced in introduction.
NNNNNNNNNRuNNNbpy + phz = dppz[Ru(bpy)2dppz]2+
Figure 1.1: Chemical structure of ligand (dppz) fragments and [Ru(bpy)2dppz]2+.
1.2 Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)
DNA is a very long, threadlike macromolecule built form a large number of dexoyribonucleotides, each composed of a base, a sugar, and a phosphate group. The bases of DNA molecules carry genetic information, whereas their sugar and phosphate group perform a structural role. All living cells on Earth, without any known exception, store their hereditary information in the universal language of DNA sequences. These monomers string together in a long linear sequence that encodes the genetic information.
1.2.1 Chemical structure of DNA
Fi
gure 1.2: (A) Building block of DNA. (B) DNA strand. (C) Templated polymerization of new strand. (D) Double-stranded DNA. (E) DNA double helix [1].
DNA is made up of simple subunits, called nucleotides (Figure 1.2A and Figure 1.4), each consisting of a sugar-phosphate molecule with a nitrogen-containing sidegroup, called base, attached to it [2]. The bases are of four types (adenine, guanine, cytosine, and thymine), corresponding to four distinct nucleotides, labeled A, G, C, and T, the chemical structure of these bases is shown in Figure 1.3. A single strand of DNA consists of nucleotides joined together by sugar-phosphate linkages (Figure 1.2B). Note that the individual sugar-phosphate units are asymmetric, giving the backbone of the strand a definite directionality, or polarity. The backbone has two important features: it is highly flexible and is highly charged (in water, at room temperature). The negative charge of the backbone is due to the fact that the phosphate groups in water or under physiological pH are fully dissociated. Through template polymerization (Figure
1.2C), the sequence of nucleotides in an existing DNA strand controls the sequence in which nucleotides are joined together in a new DNA strand; T in one strand pairs with A in the other, and G in one strand pairs with C in the other. The new strand has a nucleotide sequence complementary to that of the old strand, and a backbone with opposite directionality, i.e. GTAA. . . of the original strand, and . . .TTAC in complementary one. Normally DNA molecule consists of two complementary strands (Figure 1.2D). The nucleotides within each strand are linked by strong (covalent) chemical bonds; the complementary nucleotides on opposite strands are held together more weakly, by hydrogen bonds. The two strands twist around each other forming a double helix (Figure 1.2E)--a strong structure that can accommodate any sequence of nucleotides without changing its basic structure. The bases can pair in this way only if the two polynucleotide chains that contain them are anti-parallel to each other.
NH2NHCCCCNCNHHH2NHNCOCCCNCNHHNNAdenine(A)Guanine(G)OHNCCCCCH3NOCNH2CCCHONHHNHHThymineCytosine(T)(C)
Figure 1.3: Chemical structure of four types of the DNA bases.
Figure 1.4:: DNA consists of nucleotides. Single nucleotide is a sugar-phosphate molecule with attached nitrogen-containing base. Here, thymine (T) is presented [1].
1.2.2 Physical properties of DNA
The physical structure of double-stranded DNA is determined by the fact that its character is amphiphilic [3]. That means that one part of DNA chain (the phosphate backbone) is hydrophilic and another one (bases) is hydrophobic. Along with the flexibility of backbone, this amphiphilic character is a cause of double-helical structure of DNA. Double-stranded DNA occurs as a ladder which is twisted around its axis right-handed. The diameter of such twisted double-helix is 2.37 nm [3]. The twisting angle between adjacent base pairs is 34.6° and the distance between two neighbor nucleotides is 0.34 nm. The number of base pairs coinciding with the full twist (360°) of DNA double-helix is around 10.4 [3]. That full twist repeats itself in every 3.4 nm (Figure 1.5). Between two molecules of deoxyribose attached to complementary base pairs, there is a space for creating grooves, which go along the whole DNA chain. Both
Figure 1.14: Steady-state emission spectra of Ru(bpy)2(dppz)2+(10 ??) in the absence and presence of B-form (top left), Z-form (top right), and A-form (bottom) double-helical DNA [36].
2). Ru(bpy)2dppz2+--the light switch effect as a function of nucleic acid sequence and conformation [37]:
The spectroscopic propeties for Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ and Ru(phen)2dppz2+ on binding to nucleic acids of different sequences and conformations have been explored by spectroscopic measurements. Both complexes (Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ and Ru(phen)2dppz2+) serve as “molecular light switch” for DNA, luminescing intensely in the presence of DNA but no photoluminescence in aqueous solution. The luminescent enhancement observed upon binding is attributed to the sensitivity of the excited state to quenching by water; the metal complex, upon intercalation into the DNA helix, is protected from the aqueous solvent, thereby preserving the luminescence. Correlations between the extent of protection (depending upon the DNA conformation) and the luminescence parameters are observed. Indeed, the strongest luminescent enhancement is observed for intercalation into DNA conformations which afford the greatest amount of overlap
with access from the major groove, such as in triple helices. Differences are observed in the luminescent parameters between the two complexes which also correlate with the level of water protection. In the presence of nucleic acids, these two complexes exhibit biexponential decays in emission. Quenching studies are consistent with two intercalative binding modes for the dppz ligand from the major groove: one in which the metal-phenazine axis lies along the DNA dyad axis and another where the metal-phenazine axis lies almost perpendicular to the DNA dyad axis. Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ and Ru(phen)2dppz2+ can be seen as unique reporters of nucleic acid structures and may become valuable in the design of new diagnostics for DNA. 3). Sensitivity of Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ luminescence to DNA defects [50]:
Ru(bpy)2dppz2+, upon binding to DNA contained a defect, exhibits significant luminescent enhancements above then well matched DNA. In the presence of a single base mismatch, large luminescent enhancements are evident when ruthenium bound to an oligonucleotide containing an abasic site (Figure 1.15). Titrations with hairpin oligonucleotides containing a variable mismatch site exists correlation between the level of luminescent enhancement and the thermodynamic destabilization associated with the mismatch. This correlation is reminiscent of that found earlier for a bulky rhodium complex that binds mismatched DNA sites through metalloinsertion, where the complex binds the DNA from the minor groove side, ejecting the mismatched bases into the major groove. This metalloinsertion mode for the dppz complex at the defect site is proved by differential quenching studies with minor and major groove quenchers and time-resolved emission studies. For sure, the utility of Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ can be seen as a sensitive reporter of DNA structure with defect site.
Figure 1.15: Titrations of Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ with DNAs containing defects. Top: DNA sequences of matched, mismatched and abasic 27-mer duplex DNA (R denotes a tetrahydrofuranyl abasic site). Bottom: plots of the integrated emission intensity (λex = 440 nm) of rac- (left), Δ- (middle), and Λ-Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ (right) (100 nM) upon increasing the concentration of DNA in 50 mMNaCl, 5 mM Tris, pH7.5 [50].
4). Crystal structure of ?-Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ bound to mismatched DNA reveals side-by-side metalloinsertion and intercalation [11]:
The versatile binding modes attainable for octahedral metal complexes bearing an intercalating ligand are depicted in detail. Here it is shown that two independent views of metalloinsertion in this work, two of intercalation and one of end-capping (Figure 1.16 and 1.17). The metal complex binds with DNA through metalloinsertion in the minor groove at destabilized regions of the DNA, accompanied by extrusion of the mismatched bases. This binding mode has been observed previously with a sterically expansive ligand, but this structure clearly demonstrates that a narrower ligand such as dppz is equally capable of recognizing mismatches by the means of metalloinsertion, pointing to the generality of this binding mode. The smaller size of the dppz ligand also allows the ruthenium complex to bind through classical intercalation between two consecutive well-matched base pairs. Curiously, intercalated complexes are also located in the minor groove, which they hypothesize is stabilized by extensive ancillary interactions. This discrepancy notwithstanding, the
crystal structure attests to the remarkable structural flexibility of DNA upon high-density ligand binding, illustrates the nuanced binding geometries sampled by a non-covalently bound small molecule, and highlights the dominance of metalloinsertion as the preferred binding mode to destabilized regions of DNA. These newly obtained structural understandings will help guide the development of future generations of metal complexes as chemical tools and medicinal agents.
Figure 1.16: Structure of ?-[Ru(bpy)2dppz]2+ bound to the mismatched oligonucleotide 5′-CGGAAATTACCG-3′. Front view (left) and view rotated 90 degrees (right) around the helix axis. Three DNA-binding modes are observed: (1) metalloinsertion, whereby the ruthenium complex (red) inserts the dppz ligand into the DNA duplex (grey) at the mismatched sites through the minor groove, extruding the mispaired adenosines (blue); (2) metallointercalation, whereby the complex (green) binds between two well-matched base pairs; (3) end-capping, whereby the complex (yellow) stacks with the terminal Watson–Crick pair of the duplex [11].
Figure 1.17: The end-capping complex. The duplex (dark grey) is end-capped by the ruthenium complex (red), which stacks between an extruded adenosine (blue) and the first complex (yellow) in a crystallographically related duplex (light grey). The last GC base pair (cytidine, cyan; guanosine, green) forms a frayed end [11].
1.5 Characterization of Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ and DNA interaction
Ru(bpy)2dppz
2+
exhibits intense luminescence when upon binding to DNA due to
the ligand part (dppz) intercalation into intact DNA base pair. There are two very interesting questions which deserve to be determined by their interactions as the interaction between them reaches equilibrium, these will help us to understand the interaction modes and the structural changes of DNA. 1) Determination of affinity constant (Ka)
Ru?DNAbpKa[Ru?DNAbp]
A series of titrations are performed in our study, the luminescence intensity
increases with the increase of ruthenium concentration (CRu), there exists linear
relationship between luminescence and rate of complexation at lower ruthenium concentration, which will be presented in the experimental part of chapter 2. In order to compute the affinity constant and complexation degrees without any hypothesis, in particular without assuming that the concentration at which DNA is saturated is known, a analysis method given by C. J. Halfman and T. Nishida is employed to calculate them according to the luminescence intensity change induced by Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ intercalation [52]. The values of affinity constant (be of the order of 106 M-1 at [NaCl] = 10 mM) gotten from Nishida method is similar with that value computed from the other scientists. 2) Dynamical changes of DNA helix
Although it is well known that the length of DNA increases approximately, when
one Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ molecule intercalates into DNA base pair [53]. The induced dynamical changes, in terms of DNA, fluctuations are not established. In Chapter 3 of this manuscript, we will quantify the change of flexibility induced by the intercalation of Ru(bpy)2dppz2+, of a short dsDNA (15 base paris long). What about the kink when the binding of DNA with Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ occurs?
正在阅读:
毕业设计文献翻译 - 图文10-31
全民健身户外活动基地命名资助办法04-10
高三数学竞赛讲座应用题选讲 (2)06-25
四川省资阳市2008届第一次高考模拟考试数学(理科)试题05-18
深河乡高危妊娠及孕产妇转诊网络管理规范06-04
微机原理题库(试题和答案,全)05-02
GMSK调制器电路设计与FPGA实现07-22
组织胚胎学试题01-17
泰国旅游行前说明会(资深领队亲自编写)09-05
2022年德育课教学计划04-16
- 多层物业服务方案
- (审判实务)习惯法与少数民族地区民间纠纷解决问题(孙 潋)
- 人教版新课标六年级下册语文全册教案
- 词语打卡
- photoshop实习报告
- 钢结构设计原理综合测试2
- 2014年期末练习题
- 高中数学中的逆向思维解题方法探讨
- 名师原创 全国通用2014-2015学年高二寒假作业 政治(一)Word版
- 北航《建筑结构检测鉴定与加固》在线作业三
- XX县卫生监督所工程建设项目可行性研究报告
- 小学四年级观察作文经典评语
- 浅谈110KV变电站电气一次设计-程泉焱(1)
- 安全员考试题库
- 国家电网公司变电运维管理规定(试行)
- 义务教育课程标准稿征求意见提纲
- 教学秘书面试技巧
- 钢结构工程施工组织设计
- 水利工程概论论文
- 09届九年级数学第四次模拟试卷
- 毕业设计
- 文献
- 翻译
- 图文
- 好学生课堂达标冀教版英语六年级上答案
- 微生物形态观察 - 图文
- kV交流耐压试验方案
- 考生经验分享:司法考试复习三要点每日一练(2016.1.13)
- 2012辽宁会计从业考试《财经法规》模拟题及答案(第六套)
- 2016年8月中学校长培训心得体会范文精选4篇
- 中国上下五千年(历朝简介及版图)
- 质量目标质量控制手段和质量保证措施
- 自第十二届运动会羽毛球分赛各单位报名表
- 高频实验指导书
- 凝血酶原与凝血酶的区别?
- 铸造工艺学考题
- 水泥稳定碎石基层裂缝产生的原因、危害、预防及处理措施
- 2019年整理--在妇女儿童发展规划实施情况汇报会上的致辞
- 2012学年第一学期天河区期末考试卷 - 图文
- 信贷1
- 盘点国内几大CG培训机构
- 圆锥曲线中的最值和范围问题
- 思念也是一种美丽
- 葡萄酒与西方文化