阅读理解
更新时间:2024-05-02 08:24:01 阅读量: 综合文库 文档下载
Orthodox views prize intelligence and intellectual rigor highly in the modern realm of universities and tech industry jobs. One of the underlying assumptions of this value system is that smart people, by virtue of what they've learned, will formulate better decisions. Often this is true. Yet psychologists who study human decision making processes have uncovered cognitive biases common to all people, regardless of intelligence, that can lead to poor decisions in experts and laymen alike.
Thankfully these biases can be avoided. Understanding how and in what situations they occur can give you an awareness of your own limitations and allow you to factor them into your decision-making.
One of the most common biases is what is known as the fundamental attribution error. Through this people attribute the failures of others to character flaws and their own to mere circumstance, subconsciously considering their own characters to be stainless. \recession.\It also leads us to attribute our own success to our qualifications, discounting luck, while seeing others' success as the product of mere luck.
In other words, we typically demand more accountability from others than we do from ourselves. Not only does this lead to petty judgments about other people, it also leads to faulty risk assessment when you assume that certain bad things only happen to others. For example, you might assume, without evidence, that the price of your house will go up even though 90 percent of them have dropped in price, because you yourself are more competent.
Confirmation bias is sometimes found together with fundamental attribution error. This one has two parts. First, we tend to gather and rely upon information that only confirms our existing views. Second, we avoid or veto things that refute our preexisting hypotheses.
For example, imagine that you suspect your computer has been hacked. Every time it stalls or has a little error, you assume that it was triggered by a hacker and that your suspicions are valid. This bias plays an especially big role in rivalries between two opposing views. Each side partitions their own beliefs in a logic-proof loop, and claims their opponent is failing to recognize valid points. Outwitting confirmation bias therefore requires exploring both sides of an argument with equal diligence.
Similar to confirmation bias is the overconfidence bias. In an ideal world, we could be correct 100 percent of the time we were 100 percent sure about something, correct 80 percent of the time we were 80 percent sure about something, and so on. In reality, people's confidence vastly exceeds the accuracy of those judgments. This bias most frequently comes into play in areas where someone has no direct evidence and must make a guess - estimating how many people are in a crowded plaza, for example, or how likely it will rain. To make matters worse, even when people are aware of overconfidence bias, they will still tend to overstate the chances that they are correct. Confidence is no prophet and is best used together with available evidence. When
witnesses are called to testify in a court trial, the confidence in their testimony is measured along with and against the evidence at hand.
The availability bias is also related to errors in estimation, in that we tend to estimate what outcome is more likely by how easily we can recount an example from memory. Since the retention and retrieval of memories is biased toward vivid, sensational, or emotionally charged examples, decisions based on them can often lead to strange, inaccurate conclusions.
In action this bias might lead someone to cancel a trip to, for example, the Canary Islands because of a report that the biggest plane crash in history happened there. Likewise some people might stop going out at night for fear of assault or rape. Repelling the availability bias calls for an empirical approach to a particular decision, one not based on the obscured reality of vivid memory. If there is a low incidence of disaster, like only one out of 100,000 plane landings results in a crash, it is safe to fly to the Canary Islands. If one out of one million people who go out is assaulted, it is safe to go out at night.
The sunk cost fallacy has a periodic application and was first identified by economists. A good example of how it works is the casino slot machine. Gamblers with a high threshold for risk put money into a slot machine hoping for a big return, but with each pull of the lever they lose some money playing the odds. If they have been pulling the lever many times in a row without success, they might decide that they had better keep spending money at the machine, or they will have wasted everything they already put in.
The truth is that every pull of the lever has the same winning probability of nearly one in a trillion, regardless of how much money has been put in before - the previous plays were sunk costs.
In everyday life this can lead people to stay in damaging situations because of how much they have already put in, stuck on the erroneous belief that the value of that time or energy they have invested will decay or disappear if they leave. The wisest course is to recognize the effects of the sunk cost fallacy and to leave a bad situation regardless of how much you have already invested.
While there are still more biases, the key to avoiding them remains the same: When a decision matters, it is best to rely on watertight logic and a careful examination of the evidence and to remain aware that what seems like good intuition is always subject to errors of judgment.
26. What is a traditional view about smart people according to Paragraph 1? A They often do wrong things. B They have no cognitive biases. C They can make better decisions. D They can learn things more quickly.
27. According to the text, the most typical characteristic of the fundamental error is that _____________.
A you blame other people or their personality for an existing problem B you believe competence is most important to achieving success C you don’t recognize the importance of luck in someone’s success D you hold a negative attitude toward the work you are trying to do
28. If you are only interested in evidence that is in agreement with your own belief, you are being affected by_________. A the fundamental attribution error B the confirmation bias C the overconfidence bias D the availability bias
29. The overconfidence bias usually occurs when_____. A someone is 100 percent sure about something B someone uses evidence that is easily available C someone fails to examine the evidence carefully D someone has no evidence and has to make a guess
30. The availability bias leads to strange and inaccurate conclusions because it causes people to ______.
A become too confident about their predictions B use evidence that is not so convincing and strong C pay too much attention to others’ character flaws
D avoid information that is not supportive of their views
31. According to the text, the reason why people don’t want to leave a bad investment situation and commit the sunk cost fallacy is that __________. A they don’t want to admit that they have made a poor decision B they will lose more money if they decide not to continue it C they will have greater chances to win if they are patient D they don’t want their previous investments to be wasted
32. From the text, we can learn that smart people make bad decisions because_________.
A they don’t know much about cognitive biases B they don’t know much about their own limitations C they are likely to be affected by some cognitive biases
D they lack knowledge about things not in their field of study 33. The purpose of the text is ____________.
A to help us learn about cognitive biases and be better at decision-making B to explain why smart people make various kinds of poor decisions
C to prove to us that cognitive biases are not rare but are with us every day D to show the similarities and differences between different cognitive biases 34. What can lead to poor decisions in experts and laymen alike?_______.
A Intelligence B Orthodox views C Assumption D Cognitive biases 35. What does the word “petty” in paragraph 4 mean?_________. A lovely B pretty C unimportant D adorable
答案
26-35 CABD BDCA DC
正在阅读:
阅读理解05-02
一年级下册解决问题(有多余条件、比多、比少)应用题练习01-24
社区书记新年贺词_新年专题03-22
2006年7月至2010年7月计算机组成原理试题总09-11
蒋蒋《拜你所赐》歌词02-16
江苏高考历史考点整理05-07
小学生2017年自己写给自己的新学期寄语02-16
我和字典做朋友作文350字06-26
- 多层物业服务方案
- (审判实务)习惯法与少数民族地区民间纠纷解决问题(孙 潋)
- 人教版新课标六年级下册语文全册教案
- 词语打卡
- photoshop实习报告
- 钢结构设计原理综合测试2
- 2014年期末练习题
- 高中数学中的逆向思维解题方法探讨
- 名师原创 全国通用2014-2015学年高二寒假作业 政治(一)Word版
- 北航《建筑结构检测鉴定与加固》在线作业三
- XX县卫生监督所工程建设项目可行性研究报告
- 小学四年级观察作文经典评语
- 浅谈110KV变电站电气一次设计-程泉焱(1)
- 安全员考试题库
- 国家电网公司变电运维管理规定(试行)
- 义务教育课程标准稿征求意见提纲
- 教学秘书面试技巧
- 钢结构工程施工组织设计
- 水利工程概论论文
- 09届九年级数学第四次模拟试卷
- 2016年全国高职云计算技术与应用B卷
- P1010rdb新单板u-boot移植过程总结
- 2018年八年级上册数学期末压轴题训练1
- 2018版中国电力建设行业全景发展战略研究报告目录
- 外文翻译
- 教育惩戒立法的民间尝试
- 实验二 园林植物优良单株的选择
- 钢筋笼及钢支撑起重吊装方案
- 2016年银山镇土地整理可行性研究(优秀甲级资质可行性研究报告)
- 施工组织设计
- 华中师范的导师们
- 驰名商标认定工作细则
- 罗源县乡镇地名志(经典)
- 云南省公共基础知识复习要点大全
- 2015 消费税练习题 附答案
- 2000-2013年英语高考英语翻译
- 高教版《金融市场学》课后习题答案
- 《大学生心理健康教育》作业(综合大作业)
- 关于申请修缮知名革命烈士曾拔英墓地的请示
- MIDAS Gen常见问题与解答 200803