Comparison of Geometric and Algebraic Multigrid Methods in Edge-Based Finite-Element Analysis
更新时间:2023-05-07 20:49:01 阅读量: 实用文档 文档下载
- comparison推荐度:
- 相关推荐
1672IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS,VOL.41,NO.5,MAY2005 Comparison of Geometric and Algebraic Multigrid Methods in Edge-Based Finite-Element Analysis
K.Watanabe,H.Igarashi,and T.Honma,Member,IEEE
Division of Systems Science and Informatics,Graduate School of Information Science and Technology,Hokkaido University,
Sapporo060-0814,Japan
This paper discusses the comparison between the geometric multigrid(GMG)method and the algebraic multigrid(AMG)method in edge-based?nite-element(FE)analysis.The GMG method requires the hierarchical meshes.On the other hand,the AMG method requires the only a single mesh information.The system matrices of the coarse grids are generated using algebraic operation in AMG. The numerical results show that both multigrid methods are faster than the conventional solvers in large-scale analysis.Although multi-grid methods require the setup procedures,the calculation time of these procedures is comparatively short and increase linearly with the number of unknowns.
Index Terms—Algebraic multigrid(AMG),edge element,?nite-element method(FEM),geometric multigrid(GMG).
I.I NTRODUCTION
T HE MULTIGRID method has been applied to electromag-
netic?eld problems so far,to show that it can signi?-
cantly reduce computational time in comparison with conven-
tional linear solvers such as incomplete Cholesky conjugate gra-
dient(ICCG).The geometric multigrid(GMG)method requires
the hierarchical meshes.The nested GMG method[1],in which
the?ner meshes are automatically obtained by dividing each
coarse element into several?ner elements,is used in our study.
This lightens the load of mesh generators.On the other hand,the
algebraic multigrid(AMG)method requires the only a single
mesh information.The system matrices on the coarse meshes
are generated using algebraic operations in AMG.We compare
the computation time of the two methods in a?nite-element
(FE)analysis to show the effectiveness for large-scale analysis.
In this paper,we evaluate these setup process of multigrid in
large-scale FE analysis.
II.F ORMULATION
A.Magnetostatic Problem
Let us consider magnetostatic?eld governed
by
(1)
(2)
where is the magnetic
reluctivity,is the vector potential,
and
is the current density.The current vector
potential
(3)
is introduced for satisfaction of(2).Equation(1)now leads
to
(4)
Digital Object Identi?er10.1109/TMAG.2005.846092
FE discretization of(4)results in the system of linear
equations
(5)
where is a positively semide?nite matrix which is the
discrete counterpart of the operator in the left side of
(4),
and denote column vectors corresponding
to
and,
respectively.
B.GMG Method
It is known that the linear solvers such as Gauss–Seidel and
CG methods tend to eliminate the high-frequency components
of the residue in(5)more rapidly than the low-frequency com-
ponents.The multigrid method is based on this property,that
is,the high-frequency residual components are eliminated on a
?ne mesh by small numbers of iterations of the linear solver
(smoother).The remained residual components are then pro-
jected onto a more coarse mesh,in which they now have high
frequency that can again be eliminated by small numbers of the
iterations.The multigrid method solves(5)successively per-
forming these processes.This procedure is usually called the
coarse grid correction.Although there are many variations in
multigrid method,all these variations are based on the coarse
grid correction.The procedure of the two-grid V-cycle method
that is the simplest multigrid method is described in the fol-
lowing.
Step1(Smoothing):The smoothing operation is applied to
the system
equation
(6)
for the?ne mesh to obtain approximate
solution,
where
denotes the system matrix de?ned on the?ne mesh.In this
step,the high-frequency components in the solution error are
eliminated.
Step2:The residual
vector corresponding to the ap-
proximate
solution,is
calculated
(7)
0018-9464/$20.00?2005IEEE
正在阅读:
Comparison of Geometric and Algebraic Multigrid Methods in Edge-Based Finite-Element Analysis05-07
浙江中医药大学-毕业考试611-23
濮阳市集中供热改造工程架空标段06-22
人不为己,天诛地灭02-18
美丽的田野小学生三年级作文06-12
实验讲义修改11-711-23
小学数学教研组计划07-03
工序交接、自检互查质量检查doc01-29
作文:美丽的泉城广场12-24
- 1Comparison and Contrast
- 2Line and Edge detection
- 3Technical Specification Methods
- 4Technical Specification Methods
- 5MULTIGRID IN H(div) AND H(curl)
- 6Algebraic Topological Modeling for Cyberworld Design
- 7Error Analysis and Contrastive Analysis
- 8A Comparison Between Chinese Etiquette and Western Etiquette
- 9Phase Transition in Anyon Superconductivity at Finite Temperature
- 10Properties of Strange Hadronic Matter in Bulk and in Finite Systems
- 教学能力大赛决赛获奖-教学实施报告-(完整图文版)
- 互联网+数据中心行业分析报告
- 2017上海杨浦区高三一模数学试题及答案
- 招商部差旅接待管理制度(4-25)
- 学生游玩安全注意事项
- 学生信息管理系统(文档模板供参考)
- 叉车门架有限元分析及系统设计
- 2014帮助残疾人志愿者服务情况记录
- 叶绿体中色素的提取和分离实验
- 中国食物成分表2020年最新权威完整改进版
- 推动国土资源领域生态文明建设
- 给水管道冲洗和消毒记录
- 计算机软件专业自我评价
- 高中数学必修1-5知识点归纳
- 2018-2022年中国第五代移动通信技术(5G)产业深度分析及发展前景研究报告发展趋势(目录)
- 生产车间巡查制度
- 2018版中国光热发电行业深度研究报告目录
- (通用)2019年中考数学总复习 第一章 第四节 数的开方与二次根式课件
- 2017_2018学年高中语文第二单元第4课说数课件粤教版
- 上市新药Lumateperone(卢美哌隆)合成检索总结报告
- Comparison
- Geometric
- Algebraic
- Multigrid
- Analysis
- Methods
- Element
- Finite
- Based
- Edge
- 四川建设工程合同标准版本第三部分专用条款
- 【最新】春五年级数学下册第二单元校园艺术节分数的意义和性质分数的基本性质教案青岛版六三制
- 教程 字幕教程 ass特效
- 教科版三年级科学下册第二单元教案
- 2013版化学全程复习方略 课时提能演练(十四) 4.5海水资源的开发利用 环境保护与绿色化学(人教版)
- 苏科版初二数学第四章小结与思考2
- 2014全国名校化学试题分类解析汇编(11月第二期):A2气
- 泰州诚达精工新材料有限公司年产8万吨特种铸件项目可行性研究报告
- 施工总平面布置设计
- 河南省郑州市XX棚户区改造项目可行性研究报告-精品
- 莺歌海—琼东南盆地构造-地层格架及南海动力变形分区
- 高三专题复习——形容词 副词
- 基于AT89C51单片机的16x16点阵LED显示器设计
- 继续教育试题及答案(多选)教程文件
- 部编版六年级语文下册1-3单元各课知识点梳理
- 第22课北方的民族汇聚教案
- 2016北京朝阳区高一(上)期末数学
- 高考英语复合句知识点分类汇编附答案解析
- 生物人教版八年级下册昆虫的生殖和发育说课稿
- 学校2020年安全教育宣传制度