糖蛋白的分离鉴定方法
更新时间:2023-04-12 14:16:01 阅读量: 实用文档 文档下载
- 脑脊液糖蛋白分离推荐度:
- 相关推荐
A sub-proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana mature stems trapped on Concanavalin A is enriched in cell wall glycoside hydrolases
Michel Zivy3, and
90% of plant cell walls and constitute three different kinds of polymers: cellulose,
hemicelluloses and pectins. Plant cell wall polysaccharide composition and structure change
during plant development and are different from one plant species to another (Cosgrove,
1997; Popper and Fry, 2003). Cell wall proteins (CWPs) contribute to wall architecture or are
involved in the regulation of growth and development, or defence against biotic or abiotic
stresses (Lee et al., 2004; Jamet et al., 2006). Cell wall modifying proteins such as glycoside
hydrolases (GHs), esterases, transglycosylases, lyases and peroxidases are involved in the
construction, remodelling or turnover of cell wall components (Heredia et al., 1995; Cosgrove,
1997; Fry, 2004; Stolle-Smits et al., 1999; Obel et al., 2002; Reiter, 2006).
The enzymes of GH and transglycosylase superfamilies are particularly important for the
reorganization of cell wall polysaccharides after their deposition (Fry, 2004; Minic and
Jouanin, 2006). They fall into several families whose distinction is based on amino acid
sequence similarities (Henrissat, 1991; 1998). Exo-glycanases attack polysaccharides
progressively from the non-reducing end or substituted side groups, thus releasing
monosaccharides. Endo-glycanases attack polysaccharide backbones in an endo-fashion. They
have a large impact on the molecular mass of polysaccharides. A third group of hydrolases can
break some substituted non-carbohydrate groups linked to wall polysaccharides such as O -
acetyl, O -methyl and O -feruloyl groups (Fry, 2004). Xyloglucan transglycosylase hydrolases
(XTHs) can exhibit both endo-glycanase and transglycosylase activities (Fry, 2004).
Significant progress has been made in proteomic analysis of plant cell walls (Jamet et al.,
2006). Interesting results were obtained using cell cultures, culture medium of seedlings,
leaves, etiolated hypocotyls, protoplasts and roots (Chivasa et al., 2002; Borderies et al.,
2003; Boudart et al., 2005; Charmont et al., 2005; Kwon et al., 2005; Jamet et al., 2006; Zhu
et al., 2006). One cell wall proteome of mature stems was described in Medicago sativa L.
(Watson et al., 2004). All these studies were based either on elution of cell wall proteins from
living cells or on extraction of proteins from purified cell walls with salt solutions. However,
since all CWPs are secreted proteins, they can be N -glycosylated with sugars such as D-glucose
and D-mannose during their passage through endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi (Lerouge et al.,
1998). It should be possible to trap them on Concanavalin A (Con A) which is a lectin extracted
from Canavalia ensiformis L. able to bind molecules containing α-D-mannopyranosyl, β-D-
glucopyranosyl or sterically-related residues (Carlsson et al., 1998). Recently, the N-
glycoproteomes of human urine and human bile were analysed using Con A Sepharose affinity
chromatography followed by 2D-electrophoresis and mass spectrometry (Kristiansen et al.,
2004; Wang et al., 2006). The majority of the proteins identified were predicted to be
extracellular or membrane components. Con A affinity chromatography was also used for the
characterisation of N -linked glycoproteins of Ceanorhabditis elegans (Kaji et al., 2003) and
of GHs from various plant organs (Sheldon et al., 1998; Wilson and Altmann, 1998; Minic et
al., 2004; Li and Kushad, 2005; Minic et al., 2006; Van Riet et al., 2006). In this work, we
have developed a new proteomic approach starting from a crude protein extract and using Con
A Sepharose affinity chromatography to identify soluble cell wall N -linked glycoproteins. This
glycoproteome is significantly enriched for putative cell wall GHs compared to previous cell
wall proteomes.Materials and methods
Plant material
Wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana , Wassilewskija ecotype, was grown in the greenhouse at 20°
C to 22°C with a 16 h-photoperiod at 150 μE.m ?2.s ?1. Inflorescence stems of plants at mature
stage (18–22 cm) were used for analysis.
Minic et al.Page 2
J Exp Bot . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript
Preparation of protein extracts from stems of A. thaliana
Mature stems of A. thaliana measuring 18–22 cm in length at the late flowering stage were
used for analysis. Approximately 10 g of stem tissues were suspended in 12 mL of ice-cold
extraction buffer and grinded in a mortar with a pestle for 5 min. The extraction buffer consisted
in 25 mM BisTris pH 7.0 (HCl), 200 mM CaCl 2, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 4 μM Na-cacodylate,
1/200 (v/v) protease inhibitor cocktail (P-9599, Sigma Chemical, St Louis, MO, USA). The
ground material was centrifuged twice at 4°C for 3 min at 10,000 g , and the supernatant was
further centrifuged for 15 min at 17,000 g . The resulting supernatant was used for
chromatographic analyses.
Con A Sepharose affinity chromatography
A 1 x 6-cm column was filled with 3 mL of Con A Sepharose (Sigma Chemical, St Louis, MO,
USA) and washed with 6 mL of 20 mM Tris pH 7.4 (HCl), 1 mM CaCl 2/MgCl 2/MnCl 2 and
0.5 M NaCl buffer. The soluble protein extract (10 mL) was added and then washed with 15
mL of this buffer at a flow rate of 5 mL.h ?1. Proteins were eluted with 0.2 M methyl-α-
glucopyranoside in the same buffer. The eluate was collected, concentrated by “Ultrafree-
CL” (10 kDa) (Sigma Chemical, St Louis, MO, USA) to 300 μL and dialysed against 7 M urea,
5 mM K 2CO 3, 0.125% SDS, 0.6% Triton X-100, 1 mM DTT, 2% carrier ampholytes 3–10
(GE Healthcare Europe GmbH, Orsay, France).
Glycoside hydrolase activities
The reaction mixture contained 2 mM p NP-glycosides (Sigma Chemical, St Louis, MO, USA),
0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 5.0), 2 mM sodium azide, and 50 μL of protein extract in a total
volume of 0.5 mL. The reaction was carried out at 37°C for 5 to 60 min (depending on activity)
and stopped by the addition of 0.5 mL 0.4 M sodium chloride. Controls were stopped at time
0. Concentration of the resulting p NP was determined spectrophotometrically at 405 nm by
comparison to a calibration curve. Standard deviations values for 3 replicate assays were less
than 5%.
2D-electrophoresis
Isoelectric focusing (IEF) was performed using 24 cm-immobilized pH gradient (IPG) strips
(GE Healthcare Europe GmbH, Orsay, France) with a linear pH gradient from 4 to 7 and 250
μg of protein were applied on an IPG strip for in-gel rehydration in 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea,
2% CHAPS, 10 mM DTT, 2% IPG buffer pH 4–7 (Méchin et al., 2004). Focusing was achieved
using a Protean IEF Cell (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). An active rehydration was performed
at 22°C during 12 h at 50 V prior to focusing. To improve sample entry, the voltage was
increased step by step from 50 to 10,000 V (0.5 h at 200 V, 0.5 h at 500 V, 1 h at 1000 V then
10,000 V for a total of 94,000 V h). After IEF, IPG strips were successively incubated in 50
mM Tris pH 8.8 (HCl), 6 M urea, 30% glycerol, 2 % SDS, 1% DTT for 15 min, and in 50 mM
Tris pH 8.8 (HCl), 6 M urea, 30% glycerol, 2 % SDS, 2.5% iodoacetamide for 15 min (G?rg
et al., 1987). Strips were further sealed on top of the 1 mm-thick second dimensional gel (24
x 24 cm) with the help of 1% low-melting agarose in SDS–electrophoresis buffer (25 mM Tris,
0.2 M glycine, 0.1% SDS). Continuous gels (11% T, 2.67% C gels with PDA as cross-linking
agent) were used. Separation was carried out at 20 V for 1 h and subsequently at a maximum
of 30 mA/gel, 120 V overnight, until the bromophenol blue front had reached the end of the
gel.
Protein staining
Following 2D-electrophoresis, gels were stained with colloidal Coomassie blue G250
according to Mechin et al. (2004).Minic et al.Page 3J Exp Bot . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript
Identification of proteins by mass spectrometry
The inpidual protein spots obtained after 2D-electrophoresis were excised and in-gel digested
with trypsin according to a standard protocol (Santoni et al., 2003). Tryptic peptides from each
protein were analyzed by nanoHPLC-MS/MS or MALDI-TOF MS as previously described
(Minic et al., 2004; Mechin et al., 2004). Proteins analysed by MALDI-TOF MS were identified
via automated NCBI non redundant protein database (2539bf120b4e767f5acfce7c/) searching
using the MASCOT programme (2539bf120b4e767f5acfce7c/search_form_select).
Only mowse scores exceeding threshold (p<0.5) were considered as positive results.
Identification of proteins with nanoHPLC-MS/MS (ion trap) was performed with Biowoks ?
(Thermo scientific, San Jose, USA). The main search parameters were methionine oxidation
as differential modification and trypsin as enzyme. One miss cleavage was allowed. The A.
thaliana protein database was downloaded from the mips website
(http://mips.gsf.de/projects/plants). Identification was considered significant when the proteins
were identified with at least 2 different tryptic peptides as first candidate, Xcorr > 1.7, 2.2 and
3.3 for respectively mono-, di- and tri-charged peptides and delta Cn >0.1.
Bioinformatics analyses
Sub-cellular localization and length of signal peptides were predicted using PSORT
(http://psort.nibb.ac.jp/) and TargetP (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/) (Nielsen et al.,
1997; Emanuelsson et al., 2000). Prediction of transmembrane domains was done with
Aramemnon (http://aramemnon.botanik.uni-koeln.de/) (Schwacke et al, 2003). Molecular
masses and pI values were calculated using the aBi program
(http://www.up.univ-mrs.fr/~wabim/d_abim/compo-p). Homologies to other proteins
were searched for using BLAST programs (2539bf120b4e767f5acfce7c/BLAST/) (Altschul
et al., 1990). Identification of protein families and functional domains was performed using
MyHits (http://myhits.isb-sib.ch/cgi-bin/motif_scan) and InterProScan
(2539bf120b4e767f5acfce7c/InterProScan/) (Quevillon et al., 2005). GHs and CEs were classified
according to the CAZy database (2539bf120b4e767f5acfce7c/CAZY/) (Coutinho et al., 1999).
Peroxidases were named as in the PeroxiBase (http://peroxidase.isb-sib.ch/index.php)
(Bakalovic et al., 2006).
Protein measurements
Protein concentration was determined by the method of Bradford (1996) using bovine serum
albumin dissolved in extraction buffer as the standard.Results and discussion
Extraction of glycoside hydrolases from stem tissues of A. thaliana
In a first attempt to study GHs from stem tissues of A. thaliana by using a proteomic approach
it was necessary to establish a protocol for the extraction of these enzymes. Based on published
experimental data on the purification of GHs from various plant organs (Sheldon et al., 1998;
Wilson and Altmann, 1998; Minic et al., 2004; Li and Kushad, 2005; Van Riet et al., 2006),
we developed a 2-step extraction procedure. Stems were ground in a buffer containing 200
mM CaCl 2, followed by Con A Sepharose affinity chromatography. CaCl 2 was chosen as the
most efficient salt for CWP extraction (Boudart et al., 2005). This protocol is different from
those used in previous cell wall proteomic studies (Feiz et al., 2006): (i) the initial step is a
grinding in a buffer containing 200 mM CaCl 2 to release CWPs instead of a low ionic strength
buffer usually used to prevent CWP elution; (ii) there is no step of cell wall isolation to avoid
loosing CWPs weakly-bound to cell walls during the centrifugation steps required for cell wall
isolation; (iii) the last step is an affinity chromatography to trap N -glycosylated proteins.
Results show that the affinity chromatography step resulted in a significant increase in specific
Minic et al.Page 4J Exp Bot . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript
HAL-AO Author Manuscript
activities of several exo-GHs using artificial substrates compared to what was measured in the
dialysed crude protein extract. These increases varied from 2.0 for β-D-xylosidase to 6.1 for
β-D glucosidase (Table 1). On the basis of this observation, this protocol was adapted to analyze
the N -glycoproteome of mature stems.
Proteomic analysis after enrichment of the soluble protein extract in glycoside hydrolases by lectin affinity chromatography
The proteomic analysis was performed using prot ein extracts from 18–22 cm mature stems at
the late flowering stage. About 10 g of stem tissues were used for the extraction of proteins.
After grinding and centrifugation, the crude protein extract contained 2.5 mg of protein as
determined by the Bradford method (1996). A fraction of this protein extract was subjected to
Con A Sepharose affinity chromatography. Eluted proteins were concentrated and dialysed,
resulting in a fraction of 400 μL containing about 300 μg of protein. A sample containing 250
μg of protein was subjected to 2D-electrophoresis. Proteins were detected by colloidal
Coomassie blue staining (Fig. 1). The number of resolved spots was about 200. Fifty-seven
spots resolved by 2D-electrophoresis were analyzed using MALDI-TOF. Spots corresponding
to proteins having molecular mass smaller than 20 kDa were not analyzed since they are not
expected to contain GHs on the basis of calculations made from genes predicted to encode such
proteins (Minic and Jouanin, 2006). The other proteins visible on the gel were also analyzed,
but due to small quantity or mixture with other proteins their scores were not significant. Fifteen
spots localized at the basic side of the gel were subjected to tryptic digestion and proteins were
identified using nanoHPLC-MS/MS. Each of them was expected to contain more than one
protein since previous studies showed that most CWP are basic (Jamet et al., 2006). A total
number of 102 different proteins was identified (Table 2; Tables S1 and S2 at JXB online).
Many of these proteins were present in several of the spots resolved by 2D-electrophoresis
suggesting post-translational modifications such as glycosylations. On the basis on these
results, those spots were collected into thirty-five groups as shown in Fig 1. Conversely, as
expected, most of the 15 spots at the basic side of the gel contained more than one protein.
Bioinformatic prediction of sub-cellular localization and N-glycosylation of identified
proteins
PSORT, TargetP and Aramemnon programmes were used to predict the sub-cellular
localization of the identified proteins. Seventy-seven out of the 102 identified proteins (77%)
were predicted to be localized in the cell wall matrix, 13 at the plasma membrane, 6 into the
endoplasmic reticulum, 2 in the cytoplasm and 3 in the chloroplast. Six proteins were predicted
to be either targeted to vacuoles or to the cell wall. However, vacuolar targeting is not well-
established in plants and the predictions are not yet very reliable (Hadlington and Denecke,
2000). Altogether, about 90% of the proteins have a predicted N-terminal signal peptide, which
means that all of these proteins are targeted to the secretory pathway. Two proteins could not
be assigned to any sub-cellular compartment due to discrepancies between predictions with
PSORT and TargetP. Seven proteins were predicted to harbour a glycosyl phosphatidyl inositol
(GPI) anchor. As expected, all of the identified proteins contained N -glycosylation sites as
predicted by the MyHits programme (see Supplementary Table S1 at JXB).
These results show that the proposed protocol allowed the isolation of a protein fraction
essentially composed of N -linked glycoproteins targeted to either the cell wall or to the plasma
membrane. Despite the absence of a cell wall purification step, it should be noted that the
proportion of proteins with a predicted intracellular localization was very low (12%). This
protocol thus appears as an efficient alternative to previously described protocols used for A.
thaliana cell wall proteomic analyses. Previous protocols include: (i) non-destructive methods
such as analysis of culture media (Borderies et al., 2003; Charmont et al. 2005), washing of
cells cultured in liquid medium with salt solutions (Borderies et al., 2003; Kwon et al. 2005)
Minic et al.Page 5
J Exp Bot . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript
and vacuum infiltration of leaves (Boudart et al., 2005); (ii) destructive methods, i.e. cell wall
purification, prior to CWP extraction with various buffers (Chivasa et al. 2002; Bayer et al.,
2006; Feiz et al., 2006). The choice of a particular protocol will depend on the aim of the study
and on the plant organ of interest.
Identification and functional classification of proteins
Identification of protein families and functional domains were performed using several
bioinformatic programmes. Proteins were classified according to the predicted functional
classes of CWPs proposed by Jamet et al. (2006) (Tables 2, 3). Proteins belonging to seven
functional classes were found according to the presence of functional domains predicted as
described in the Material and methods: (i) proteins acting on polysaccharides include GH and
esterases; (ii) oxido-reductases mainly include peroxidases and multicopper oxidases; (iii)
proteins with interacting domains include proteins with lectin or LRR (leucine rich repeat)
domains as well as enzyme inhibitors; (iv) proteins involved in signaling processes include
fasciclin AGPs (arabinogalactan proteins); (v) proteases; (vi) proteins of yet unknown function;
(vii) miscellaneous. However, this classification is provisional since the biological role of many
of these proteins remains to be determined (Tatosov et al., 1997). For example, an enzyme of
the GH 3 family (XYL3) shows amino acid homology with β-D-xylosidase. However, it was
identified as an enzyme that efficiently hydrolyzed arabinosyl residues from arabinans,
suggesting that it works as an α-L-arabinofuranosidase (Minic et al., 2006).
Thirty-three proteins were expected to act on polysaccharides (Table 2). Furthermore, 30
proteins (29%) belong to the superfamily of GHs, 29 of which were predicted to be extracellular
or plasma membrane-associated. The second largest group comprises 16 proteases, 14 of which
were predicted to be localized in the extracellular matrix. Together GHs and proteases represent
47% of identified proteins. Among other proteins, oxido-reductases, proteins with interacting
domains, miscellaneous proteins, proteins of unknown function, signalling and intracellular
proteins were identified.
Proteins from the same functional classes as in previous cell wall proteomic studies were found,
but 37 proteins were not identified before (Chivasa et al. 2002; Borderies et al. 2003; Borner
et al., 2003; Schultz et al., 2004; Boudart et al., 2005; Charmont et al. 2005; Kwon et al.
2005; Bayer et al., 2006; Feiz et al. 2006). This stem N-glycoproteome thus appears to be very
specific. Among the 90 proteins predicted to be at the plasma membrane or in the cell wall,
only 5 also have been found in previously described proteomes: cell suspension cultures, rosette
leaves and etiolated hypocotyls (Jamet et al., 2006). They encode a β-xylosidase that belongs
to the GH 31 family (At1g68560), a multicopper oxidase (At1g76160), two lectins
(At1g78850, At1g78860) and a protein homologous to the carrot extracellular dermal
glycoprotein (EDGP) and to the tomato xyloglucan specific endoglucanase inhibitor protein
(XEGIP) (At1g03220) (Qin et al., 2003). However, some protein families are missing. Since
proteins with molecular masses lower than 20 kDa were not analyzed, it was not possible to
identify homologs to protease or pectin methylesterase inhibitors, non-specific lipid transfer
proteins, and blue copper binding proteins. Only one protein homolog to germins was
identified. Although several expansins, which molecular masses are between 25 and 30 kDa,
were previously identified in cell wall proteomes (Jamet et al., 2006), none was found in this
study. This might be explained either by their low abundance or their low level of N -
glycosylation. Finally, no structural protein could be identified either because of their strong
binding to the extracellular matrix, or the absence of N-glycans.
Possible roles of proteins identified in stem tissues of A. thaliana
Proteins acting on polysaccharides constitute the major functional class. According to Coutinho
et al. (1999), they belong to 12 GH families and to 2 carbohydrate esterase (CE) families (Fig.Minic et al.Page 6
J Exp Bot . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript
2, Table 2). These enzyme families have perse biological functions in defence, signalling,hydrolysis of starch, and cell wall modifications (Minic and Jouanin, 2006). A total of 18 GHs belonging to 7 different GH families were found. Three of them, αL-arabinofuranosidase (At3g10740), α-L-arabinofuranosidase/β-D-xylosidase (At5g49360) and β-glucosidase AtGLU1 (At5g11720), were recently purified and characterized (Minic et al., 2004; Monroe et al., 1999). The XYL1 β-xylosidase and two XTHs (Meri5/At4g30270, EXGT-A1/At2g06850) have been studied previously using both biochemical and genetic approaches (Akamatsu et al., 1999; Sampedro et al., 2001; Rose et al., 2002). A pectin methyl- and a pectin acyl-esterase were also identified. Previous studies have shown that pectin methylesterase activity is inversely correlated to the growth rate of expanding tissues, suggesting its possible involvement in wall rigidification (McQueen-Mason and Cosgrove, 1995).Possible substrates in muro of the majority of these enzymes are xyloglucans and pectins. Most of them act as exo-enzymes whereas only enzymes belonging to GH families 16 and 28 act as endo-GHs on xyloglucans and homogalacturonans, respectively. Other cell wall GHs can hydrolyse β1,4 glucan, arabinoxylan and xylan. These results suggest that xyloglucan and pectins, that are composed of homogalacturonans (HG), arabinans and galactans (RG-I),undergo structural changes in mature stem. However, some GH families can act on several natural polysaccharides showing broad substrate specificity. This low specificity has been reported in the case of several purified cell wall GHs (Leach et al, 1995; Kim and al., 2000;Sampedro et al., 2001; Steele et al., 2001; Rose et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Minic et al,2004; Minic et al., 2006). It has been hypothesized that it allows efficient modification of complex cell wall polysaccharides without requiring an extremely high number of enzymes (Minic et al, 2004; 2006).Many GH families described here could have other functions than cell wall modifications.Predicted extracellular GHs such as β-D-glucuronidase (GH 79), α-D-mannosidase (GH 38)and acetyl-N-hexasaminase (chitinase-like enzymes, GH 19) could be involved in post-
translational modifications of glycoproteins. Recently, an A. thaliana β-D-glucuronidase
(AtGUS) was shown to hydrolyze glucuronic acids from carbohydrate chains of AGPs (Eudes,personal communication). Kinetic and structural analyses of Ginkgo α-D-mannosidase acting on a pyridylamino derivative of oligo mannosides strongly suggested its involvement in the catabolism and turnover of N -linked glycoproteins (Woo et al., 2004). The pumpkin endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase, partially purified from cotyledons, was highly active towards high-mannose type glycans (Kimura et al., 2002).
Among other GHs, one thioglucosyl hydrolase (GH 1), 3 β-1,3-D-glucanase (GH 17) and 3chitinase-like enzymes (GH 19 and 20) were identified. Thioglucosidases, also known as
myrosinases, play perse roles in cruciferous plant during growth, development and defence against microorganisms and insects (Rodman, 1991). Chitinase-like enzymes are able to
degrade chitin in cell walls of fungal pathogens. However, the substrates and functions of most chitinase-like enzymes are not completely known. For example, a mutation in the chitinase-like gene classified in GH 19 family (AtCTL1/At1g05850) caused a cellulose deficiency as well as aberrant patterns of lignification with incomplete cell walls in the stem pith (Zhong et al., 2002; Rogers et al., 2005).
The second largest class of identified proteins comprises proteases. Seventeen putative
proteinases including aspartyl and serine type proteases were found (Table 2). Fifteen of them were predicted to be secreted (Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online). The abundance of proteases in mature stem suggests that these enzymes may be actively involved in secondary wall formation. Proteases may play various roles in plant development and during plant pathogen interactions through maturation of CWPs and generation of active peptides. It has been shown that the extracellular subtilisin-like serine protease SDD1 (STOMATAL
Minic et al.
Page 7J Exp Bot . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.HAL-AO Author Manuscript
HAL-AO Author Manuscript
HAL-AO Author Manuscript
DENSITY AND DISTRIBUTION 1) is involved in the regulation of stomatal density and
distribution in A. thaliana (Berger and Altmann, 2000). ALE1 (ABNORMAL LEAF
EPIDERMIS1) is also predicted to encode a subtilisin-like serine protease and is assumed to
produce a peptide required for proper differentiation of epidermis (Tanaka et al., 2001). CDR1
(CONSTITUTIVE DISEASE RESISTANT 1) encodes a putative aspartic protease (Xia et al.,
2004). Overexpression of CDR1 causes dwarfing and resistance to virulent Pseudomonas
syringae . It was shown that CDR1 generates a small mobile signal (3–10 kDa) sensitive to
heating and to protease. The substrates of these three proteases are yet unknown. On the
contrary, it was shown that the CLE (CLV3/ESR-related) basic secreted proteins are processed
at their C-terminus to generate 14 amino-acid peptides that carry a biological activity (Ito et
al., 2006;Kondo et al. 2006). In those cases, the proteases have not yet been identified. Finally,
several plant cell wall proteomic analyses show a large discrepancy between the observed and
the expected molecular masses of proteins (Boudart et al., 2005;Kwon et al., 2005;Zhu et al.,
2006). Proteases could be involved in processing and/or turnover of cell wall proteins.
Several oxido-reductases such as multicopper oxidase-like (6 proteins), peroxidases (4
proteins), germin-like protein (1 protein) and a homolog to berberine bridge enzyme were
identified. In contrast to previously characterized cell wall proteomes, this study allowed the
identification of numerous multicopper oxidase-like proteins. They catalyse full, four-electron
reduction of dioxygen (O 2) to water (H 2O) using a variety of substrates (Solomon et al.,
1997). They belong to a large gene family of 19 members in A. thaliana (Jacob and Roe, 2005).
Only two members of the family have been previously studied, SKU5 (At4g12420) and SKS6
(At1g41830). It was shown that SKU5 is involved in the control of root growth (Sedbrook et
al., 2002) and that SKS6 contributes to cotyledon vascular patterning during development
(Jacob and Roe, 2005). Peroxidases are involved in many physiological and developmental
processes that have been reviewed recently (Passardi et al., 2004). They can be involved in
both cell elongation processes and in their arrest. In the latter case, they catalyze the formation
of bridges across phenolic residues of lignins and between lignins and adjacent cell wall
proteins or polysaccharides.
Three extracellular acid phosphatases were identified in this work. The presence of
phosphorylated proteins and phosphatases in plant cell wall has been reported in several
proteomes (Chivasa et al, 2002; Kwon et al., 2005; Jamet et al., 2006). However, no
extracellular kinase has yet been found (Chivasa et al., 2005). Acid phosphatases may
participate in extracellular signalling events or in regulation of cell wall proteins.
Some proteins contained interacting domains, such as LRRs. The polygalacturonase-inhibiting
protein (PGIP2/At5g06870) plays a role in plant defence (Di Matteo et al., 2006). Two proteins
identified as fasciclin-like AGPs (AtFLA8/At2g45470, AtFLA13/At5g45130) can participate
in cell-to-cell adhesion in plant (Johnson et al., 2003; Groover and Robischon, 2006). Finally,
10 proteins of unknown function were found.Concluding remarks
This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the purification procedure to isolate cell wall
glycoproteins. This includes novel GHs, multicopper oxidases and proteases. In contrast to
these analyses, we did not identify homologs to protease or pectin methylesterase inhibitors,
non-specific lipid transfer proteins, blue copper binding proteins, expansins and structural
proteins. The abundance of GHs suggests a great plasticity of polysaccharides in cell walls,
even in well-differentiated tissues such as mature stems. Finally, the presence of phosphatases,
proteases and GHs suggests a complex regulation of cell wall proteins involving various types
of post-translational modifications such as de-phosphorylation and hydrolytic processing by
proteases or glycosidases.
Minic et al.Page 8
J Exp Bot . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript
Supplementary data
Refer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
This work was partly funded by the Génoplante program Af2001-009. We thank Bruno Letarnec for growing A.
thaliana plants, Dr Christain Malosse for mass spectrometry analyses, Drs Jorun Johansen and Herman H?fte for
improving this manuscript.References
Akamatsu T, Hanzawa Y, Ohtake Y, Takahashi T, Nishitani K, Komeda Y. Expression of endoxyloglucan transferase genes in acaulis mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 1999;121:715–722. [PubMed:10557219]Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 1990;215:403–410. [PubMed: 2231712]Bakalovic N, Passardi F, Ioannidis V, Cosio C, Penel C, Falquet L, Dunand C. PeroxiBase: A class III plant peroxidase database. Phytochemistry 2006;67:534–539. [PubMed: 16442574]Bayer EM, Bottrill AR, Walshaw J, Vigouroux M, Naldrett MJ, Thomas CL, Maule AJ. Arabidopsis cell wall proteome defined using multidimensional protein identification technology. Proteomics 2006;6:301–311. [PubMed: 16287169]Berger D, Altmann T. A subtilisin-like serine protease involved in the regulation of stomatal density and distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana . Genes and Development 2000;14:1119–1131. [PubMed:10809670]Bhattacharyya L, Brewer CF. Formation of homogeneous carbohydrate-lectin cross-linked precipitates from mixtures of D-galactose/N-acetyl-D-galactosamine-specific lectins and multiantennary galactosyl carbohydrates. European Journal of Biochemistry 1992;208:179–185. [PubMed: 1511686]Borderies G, Jamet E, Lafitte C, Rossignol M, Jauneau A, Boudart G, Monsarrat B, Esquerre-Tugaye MT, Boudet A, Pont-Lezica R. Proteomics of loosely bound cell wall proteins of Arabidopsis
thaliana cell suspension cultures: a critical analysis. Electrophoresis 2003;24:3421–3432. [PubMed:
14595688]
Borner GH, Lilley KS, Stevens TJ, Dupree P. Identification of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored
proteins in Arabidopsis. A proteomic and genomic analysis. Plant Physiology 2003;132:568–577.
[PubMed: 12805588]
Boudart G, Jamet E, Rossignol M, Lafitte C, Borderies G, Jauneau A, Esquerré-Tugayé MT, Pont-Lezica
R. Cell wall proteins in apoplastic fluids of Arabidopsis thaliana rosettes: identification by mass
spectrometry and bioinformatics. Proteomics 2005;5:212–221. [PubMed: 15593128]
Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein
utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 1976;72:248–254. [PubMed:
942051]
Carlsson, J.; Janson, J-C.; Sparrman, M. Affinity chromatography. In: Janson, J-C.; Ryden, L., editors.
Protein Purification, Principles, High Resolution and Applications. VCH Publishers Inc; New York:
1998. p. 275-329.
Carpita NC, Gibeaut DM. Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: consistency of
molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. The Plant Journal
1993;3:1–30. [PubMed: 8401598]
Charmont S, Jamet E, Pont-Lezica R, Canut H. Proteomic analysis of secreted proteins from Arabidopsis
thaliana seedlings: improved recovery following removal of phenolic compounds. Phytochemistry
2005;66:453–461. [PubMed: 15694452]
Chivasa S, Ndimba BK, Simon WJ, Lindsey K, Sladas AR. Extracellular ATP functions as an endogenous
external metabolite regulating plant cell viability. The Plant Cell 2005;17:3019–3034. [PubMed:
16199612]
Minic et al.Page 9J Exp Bot . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.HAL-AO Author Manuscript
HAL-AO Author Manuscript
HAL-AO Author Manuscript
Chivasa S, Ndimba BK, Simon WJ, Robertson D, Yu XL, Knox JP, Bolwell P, Slabas AR. Proteomic analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana cell wall. Electrophoresis 2002;23:1754–1765. [PubMed:12179997]Cosgrove DJ. Assembly and enlargement of the primary cell wall in plants. Annual Review of Cell Developmental Biology 1997;13:171–201.Coutinho, PM.; Henrissat, B. Carbohydrate-active enzymes: an integrated database approach. In: Gilbert,HJ.; Davies, G.; Henrissat, B.; Svensson, B., editors. Recent Advances in Carbohydrate Bioengineering. The Royal Society of Chemistry; Cambridge: 1999. p. 3-12.Di Matteo A, Bonivento D, Tsernoglou D, Federici L, Cervone F. Polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) in plant defence: a structural view. Phytochemistry 2006;67:528–533. [PubMed: 16458942]Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H, Brunak S, von Heijne G. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. Journal of Molecular Biology 2000;300:1005–1016.[PubMed: 10891285]Feiz L, Irshad M, Pont-Lezica RF, Canut H, Jamet E. Evaluation of cell wall preparations for proteomics:a new procedure for purifying cell walls from Arabidopsis hypocotyls. Plant Methods 2006;2:10.[PubMed: 16729891]Fry SC. Primary cell wall metabolism: tracking the careers of wall polymers in living plant cells. New Phytologist 2004;161:641–675.G?rg A, Postel W, Weser J, Günther S, Strahler JR, Hanash S, Somerlot L. Elimination of point streaking on silver stained two-dimensional gels by addition of iodoacetamide to the equilibration buffer.Electrophoresis 1987;8:122–124.Hadlington JL, Denecke J. Sorting of soluble proteins in the secretory pathway of plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2000;3:461–468. [PubMed: 11074376]Henrissat B. A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities.Biochemistry Journal 1991;280:309–316.Henrissat B. Glycosidase families. Biochemical Society Transactions 1998;26:153–156. [PubMed:9649738]Ito Y, Nakanomyo I, Motose H, Iwamoto K, Sawa S, Dohmae N, Fukuda H. Dodeca-CLE peptides as
suppressors of plant stem differentiation. Science 2006;313:842–845. [PubMed: 16902140]
Jacobs J, Roe JL. SKS6, a multicopper oxidase-like gene, participates in cotyledon vascular patterning
during Arabidopsis thaliana development. Planta 2005;222:652–666. [PubMed: 15986216]
Jamet E, Canut H, Boudart G, Pont-Lezica RF. Cell wall proteins: a new insight through proteomics.
Trends in Plant Sciences 2006;11:33–39.
Johnson KL, Jones BJ, Bacic A, Schultz CJ. The fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins of Arabidopsis.
A multigene family of putative cell adhesion molecules. Plant Physiology 2003;133:1911–1925.
[PubMed: 14645732]
Kaji H, Saito H, Yamauchi Y, Shinkawa T, Taoka M, Hirabayashi J, Kasai K, Takahashi N, Isobe T.
Lectin affinity capture, isotope-coded tagging and mass spectrometry to identify N-linked
glycoproteins. Nature Biotechnology 2003;21:667–672.
Kim JB, Olek AT, Carpita NC. Cell wall and membrane-associated exo-beta-D-glucanases from
developing maize seedlings. Plant Physiology 2000;123:471–486. [PubMed: 10859178]
Kimura Y, Matsuo S, Tsurusaki S, Kimura M, Hara-Nishimura I, Nishimura M. Subcellular localization
of endo-β-N -acetylglucosaminidase and high-mannose type free N -glycans in plant cell. Biochimica and Biophysica Acta 2002;1570:38–46.
Kondo T, Sawa S, Kinoshita A, Mizuno S, Kakimoto T, Fukuda H, Sakagami Y. A plant peptide encoded
by CLV3 identified by in situ MALDI-TOF MS analysis. Science 2006;313:845–848. [PubMed:16902141]
Kristiansen TZ, Bunkenborg J, Gronborg M, Molina H, Thuluvath PJ, Argani P, Goggins MG, Maitra
A, Pandey A. A proteomic analysis of human bile. Molecular Cell Proteomics 2004;3:715–728.Kwon HK, Yokoyama R, Nishitani K. A proteomic approach to apoplastic proteins involved in cell wall
regeneration in protoplasts of Arabidopsis suspension-cultured cells. Plant Cell Physiology
2005;46:843–857. [PubMed: 15769804]
Leah R, Kigel J, Svendsen I, Mundy J. Biochemical and molecular characterization of a barley seed beta-
glucosidase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1995;270:15789–15797. [PubMed: 7797581]
Minic et al.
Page 10J Exp Bot . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.HAL-AO Author Manuscript
HAL-AO Author Manuscript
HAL-AO Author Manuscript
Lee RC, Hrmova M, Burton RA, Lahnstein J, Fincher GB. Bifunctional family 3 glycoside hydrolases from barley with α-L-arabinofuranosidase and β-D-xylosidase activity. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2003;278:5377–5387. [PubMed: 12464603]Lee SJ, Saravanan RS, Damasceno CM, Yamane H, Kim BD, Rose JK. Digging deeper into the plant cell wall proteome. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 2004;42:979–988. [PubMed: 15707835]Lerouge P, Cabanes-Macheteau M, Rayon C, Fischette-Lainé AC, Gomord V, Faye L. N -glycoprotein biosynthesis in plants: recent developments and future trends. Plant Molecular Biology 1998;38:31–48. [PubMed: 9738959]Li X, Kushad MM. Purification and characterization of myrosinase from horseradish (Armoracia rusticana ) roots. Plant Physiolology and Biochemistry 2005;43:503–511.McQueen-Mason SJ, Cosgrove DJ. Expansin mode of action on cell walls. Analysis of wall hydrolysis,stress relaxation, and binding. Plant Physiology 1995;107:87–100. [PubMed: 11536663]Méchin V, Balliau T, Chateau-Joubert S, Davanture M, Langella O, Negroni L, Prioul JL, Thevenot C,Zivy M, Damerval C. A two-dimensional proteome map of maize endosperm. Phytochemistry 2004;65:1609–1618. [PubMed: 15276456]Minic Z, Jouanin L. Plant glycosyl hydrolases involved in cell wall polysaccharide degradation. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 2006;44:435–449. [PubMed: 17023165]Minic Z, Do C-T, Rihouey C, Morin H, Lerouge P, Jouanin L. Purification, functional characterization,cloning and identification of mutants of a seed specific arabinan hydrolase in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany 2006;57:2339–2351. [PubMed: 16798843]Minic Z, Rihouey C, Do CT, Lerouge P, Jouanin L. Purification and characterization of enzymes exhibiting beta-D-xylosidase activities in stem tissues of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 2004;135:867–878. [PubMed: 15181203]Monroe JD, Gough CM, Chandler LE, Loch CM, Ferrante JE, Wright PW. Structure, properties, and tissue localization of apoplastic alpha-glucosidase in crucifers. Plant Physiology 1999;119:385–397.[PubMed: 9952433]Nielsen H, Engelbrecht J, Brunak S, von Heijne G. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Engineering 1997;10:1–6. [PubMed: 9051728]
Obel N, Porchia AC, Scheller HV. Dynamic changes in cell wall polysaccharides during wheat seedling
development. Phytochemistry 2002;60:603–610. [PubMed: 12126707]
Passardi F, Penel C, Dunand C. ; Performing the paradoxica: how plant peroxidases modify the cell wall.
Trends in Plant Sciences 2004;9:534–540.
Qin O, Bergmann CW, Rose JK, Saladie M, Kolli VS, Albersheim P, Darvill AG, York WS.
Characterization of a tomato protein that inhibits a xyloglucan-specific endoglucanase. The Plant Journal 2003;34:327–38. [PubMed: 12713539]
Quevillon E, Silventoinen V, Pillai S, Harte N, Mulder N, Apweiler R, Lopez R. InterProScan: protein
domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Research 2005;33:W116–W120. [PubMed: 15980438]
Reiter WD. Biosynthesis and properties of the plant cell wall. Current Opinion in Plant Biology
2002;5:536–542. [PubMed: 12393017]
Roberts K. The plant extracellular matrix: in a new expansive mood. Current Opinion in Cell Biology
1994;6:688–694. [PubMed: 7833049]
Rodman JE. A taxonomic analysis of glucosinolate- producing plants. Systematic Botany 1991;16:598–
618.
Rogers LA, Dubos C, Surman C, Willment J, Cullis IF, Mansfield SD, Campbell MM. Comparison of
lignin deposition in three ectopic lignification mutants. New Phytologist 2005;168:123–140.
[PubMed: 16159327]
Rose JK, Braam J, Fry SC, Nishitani K. The XTH family of enzymes involved in xyloglucan
endotransglucosylation and endohydrolysis: current perspectives and a new unifying nomenclature.Plant Cell Physiology 2002;43:1421–1435. [PubMed: 12514239]
Sampedro J, Sieiro C, Revilla G, Gonzalez-Villa T, Zarra I. Cloning and expression pattern of a gene
encoding an alpha-xylosidase active against xyloglucan oligosaccharides from Arabidopsis . Plant Physiology 2001;126:910–920. [PubMed: 11402218]
Minic et al.
Page 11J Exp Bot . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.HAL-AO Author Manuscript
HAL-AO Author Manuscript
HAL-AO Author Manuscript
Santoni V, Vinh J, Pflieger D, Sommerer N, Maurel C. A proteomic study reveals novel insights into the persity of aquaporin forms expressed in the plasma membrane of plant roots. Biochemistry Journal 2003;373:289–296.Schultz CJ, Ferguson KL, Lahnstein J, Bacic A. Post-translational modifications of arabinogalactan-peptides of Arabidopsis thaliana . Endoplasmic reticulum and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchor signal cleavage sites and hydroxylation of proline. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2004;279:45503–45511. [PubMed: 15322080]Schwacke R, Schneider A, Van Der Graaff E, Fischer K, Catoni E, Desimone M, Frommer WB, Flugge UI, Kunze R. ARAMEMNON, a Novel Database for Arabidopsis Integral Membrane Proteins. Plant Physiology 2003;131:16–26. [PubMed: 12529511]Sedbrook JC, Carroll KL, Hung KF, Masson PH, Somerville CR. The Arabidopsis SKU5 gene encodes an extracellular glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored glycoprotein involved in directional root growth. The Plant Cell 2002;14:1635–1648. [PubMed: 12119380]Sheldon PS, Keen JN, Bowles DJ. Purification and characterization of N-glycanase, a concanavalin A binding protein from jackbean (Canavalia ensiformis ). Biochemical Journal 1998;330:13–20.[PubMed: 9461484]Solomon, EI.; Machonkin, TE.; Sundaram, UM. Spectroscopy of multi-copper oxidases. In:Messerschmidt, A., editor. Multicopper oxidases. World Scientific Publishing Co; Singapore: 1997.p. 103-127.Steele NM, Sulova Z, Campbell P, Braam J, Farkas V, Fry SC. Ten isoenzymes of xyloglucan endotransglycosylase from plant cell walls select and cleave the donor substrate stochastically.Biochemical Journal 2001;355:671–679. [PubMed: 11311129]Stolle-Smits T, Beekhuizen JG, Kok MT, Pijnenburg M, Recourt K, Derksen J, Voragen AG. Changes in cell wall polysaccharides of green bean pods during development. Plant Physiology 1999;121:363–372. [PubMed: 10517827]Tanaka H, Onouchi H, Kondo M, Hara-Nishimura I, Nishimura M, Machida C, Machida Y. A subtilisin-like serine protease is required for epidermal surface formation in Arabidopsis embryos and juvenile plants. Development 2001;128:4681–4689. [PubMed: 11731449]Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 1997;278:631–
637. [PubMed: 9381173]
Van Riet L, Nagaraj V, Van den Ende W, Clerens S, Wiemken A, Van Laere A. Purification, cloning
and functional characterization of a fructan 6-exohydrolase from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).Journal of Experimental Botany 2006;57:213–223. [PubMed: 16330524]
Wang L, Li F, Sun W, Wu S, Wang X, Zhang L, Zheng D, Wang J, Gao Y. Concanavalin A captured
glycoproteins in healthy human urine. Molecular and Cell Proteomics 2006;5:560–562.
Watson BS, Lei Z, Dixon RA, Sumner LW. Proteomics of Medicago sativa cell walls. Phytochemistry
2004;65:1709–1720. [PubMed: 15276432]
Wilson IB, Altmann F. Concanavalin A binding and endoglycosidase D resistance of beta1,2-xylosylated
and alpha1,3-fucosylated plant and insect oligosaccharides. Glycoconjugate Journal 1998;15:203–206. [PubMed: 9557883]
Woo KK, Miyazaki M, Hara S, Kimura M, Kimura Y. Purification and characterization of a co(II)-
sensitive alpha-mannosidase from Ginkgo biloba seeds. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry 2004;68:2547–2556.
Xia Y, Suzuki H, Borevitz J, Blount J, Guo Z, Patel K, Dixon RA, Lamb C. An extracellular aspartic
protease functions in Arabidopsis disease resistance signaling. EMBO Journal 2004;23:980–988.
[PubMed: 14765119]
Zhong R, Kays SJ, Schroeder BP, Ye ZH. Mutation of a chitinase-like gene causes ectopic deposition of
lignin, aberrant cell shapes, and overproduction of ethylene. The Plant Cell 2002;14:165–179.
[PubMed: 11826306]
Zhu J, Chen S, Alvarez S, Asirvatham VS, Schachtman DP, Wu Y, Sharp R. Cell wall proteome in the
maize primary root elongation zone. I. Extraction and identification of water-soluble and lightly ionically bound proteins. Plant Physiology 2006;140:311–325. [PubMed: 16377746]
Minic et al.
Page 12J Exp Bot . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.HAL-AO Author Manuscript
HAL-AO Author Manuscript
HAL-AO Author Manuscript
Fig 1.Analysis of A. thaliana proteins by 2D-electrophoresis. The 2D-gel was loaded with 250 μg of the fraction obtained after Con A Sepharose affinity chromatography from stem tissues of A. thaliana. The gel was stained with colloidal Coomassie blue. Fifteen spots were picked for nanoHPLC-MS/MS (1 to 15) and fifty-seven for MALDI-TOF analyses. In the latter case,
numbering refers to groups of spots containing the same protein. Arrows in the circles represent same identified proteins. Molecular mass markers are indicated on the right.
Minic et al.
Page 13J Exp Bot . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript
Fig. 2.Distribution of families of glycoside hydrolases (GH) and carbohydrate esterases (CE) in the A. thaliana stem sub-proteome. Proteins are listed in Table 2. Proteins have been classified according to the CAZy nomenclature (Henrissat et al., 1998; 2539bf120b4e767f5acfce7c/). Glycoside
hydrolase (GH) families from 1 to 79 are on the left whereas carbohydrate esterase (CE)
families 8 and 13 are on the right. White bars correspond to families that might participate in cell wall modification and reorganization.
Minic et al.
Page 14J Exp Bot . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript
HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript
Minic et al.Page 15
Table 1
Specific activities of several glycoside hydrolases after Con A Sepharose affinity chromatography
All enzyme activities were measured in vitro at 37 °C, using 50 μL of protein and pNP-glycosides as substrates.
Enzyme Specific activities (nmol/min/mg protein)Recovery (%)Ratio of specific activities
Crude protein extract After Con A Sepharose Con A Sepharose/Crude protein extract β-D-xylosidase328943 2.8
α-L-arabinofuranosidase10344266 4.3
β-D-glucuronidase102234 2.0
β-D-mannosidase2610864 4.2
α-D-mannosidase4717256 3.6
β-D-glucosidase8249793 6.1
α-D-galactosidase8546884 5.5
β-D-galactosidase39382532 2.1
α-D-glucosidase83159 3.9
J Exp Bot. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.
HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript
Minic et al.Page 16 T
a
b
l
e
2
P
r
o
t
e
i
n
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
p
r
o
t
e
o
m
i
c
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
A
.
t
h
a
l
i
a
n
a
m
a
t
u
r
e
s
t
e
m
s
P
r
e
d
i
c
t
e
d
o
r
k
n
o
w
n
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
A
c
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
S
p
o
t
n
u
m
b
e
r
b
P
r
o
t
e
i
n
s
a
c
t
i
n
g
o
n
p
o
l
y
s
a
c
c
h
a
r
i
d
e
s
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
1
A
t
2
g
4
4
4
5
7
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
1
A
t
3
g
1
8
8
1
3
,
1
4
,
1
5
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
1
A
t
5
g
5
4
5
7
4
7
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
1
(
t
h
i
o
g
l
u
c
o
s
i
d
e
h
y
d
r
o
l
a
s
e
1
)
(
T
G
G
1
)
A
t
5
g
2
6
4
1
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
3
(
B
X
L
1
)
(
b
e
t
a
-
x
y
l
o
s
i
d
a
s
e
1
)
A
t
5
g
4
9
3
6
5
,
9
,
1
1
,
1
3
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
3
(
B
X
L
2
)
(
b
e
t
a
-
x
y
l
o
s
i
d
a
s
e
2
)
A
t
1
g
2
6
4
1
3
,
1
5
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
3
A
t
5
g
2
9
5
5
,
6
,
8
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
1
6
(
x
y
l
o
g
l
u
c
a
n
e
n
d
o
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
a
s
e
)
(
E
X
G
T
-
A
1
)
(
A
t
-
X
T
H
4
)
A
t
2
g
6
8
5
1
3
,
1
4
,
1
5
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
1
6
(
x
y
l
o
g
l
u
c
a
n
e
n
d
o
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
a
s
e
)
(
M
e
r
i
5
)
(
A
t
-
X
T
H
2
4
)
A
t
4
g
3
2
7
1
5
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
1
7
A
t
3
g
7
3
2
6
,
7
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
1
7
A
t
5
g
5
6
5
9
1
1
,
1
3
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
1
7
A
t
4
g
3
1
1
4
3
3
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
1
9
(
c
h
i
t
i
n
a
s
e
)
,
c
a
r
b
o
h
y
d
r
a
t
e
-
b
i
n
d
i
n
g
m
o
d
u
l
e
f
a
m
i
l
y
1
8
(
c
h
i
t
i
n
b
i
n
d
i
n
g
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
)
A
t
2
g
4
3
5
7
3
1
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
2
(
N
-
a
c
e
t
y
l
-
b
e
t
a
-
g
l
u
c
o
s
a
m
i
n
i
d
a
s
e
)
A
t
1
g
6
5
5
9
7
,
1
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
2
(
N
-
a
c
e
t
y
l
-
b
e
t
a
-
g
l
u
c
o
s
a
m
i
n
i
d
a
s
e
)
A
t
3
g
5
5
2
6
2
2
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
2
8
(
p
o
l
y
g
a
l
a
c
t
u
r
o
n
a
s
e
)
A
t
1
g
8
1
7
8
,
9
,
1
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
2
8
(
p
o
l
y
g
a
l
a
c
t
u
r
o
n
a
s
e
)
A
t
3
g
7
8
3
2
4
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
2
8
(
p
o
l
y
g
a
l
a
c
t
u
r
o
n
a
s
e
)
A
t
3
g
1
6
8
5
2
9
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
3
1
(
a
l
p
h
a
-
g
l
u
c
o
s
i
d
a
s
e
)
(
A
t
G
L
U
1
)
A
t
5
g
1
1
7
2
9
,
1
3
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
3
1
(
a
l
p
h
a
-
x
y
l
o
s
i
d
a
s
e
)
(
X
Y
L
1
)
A
t
1
g
6
8
5
6
1
7
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
3
2
(
b
e
t
a
-
f
r
u
c
t
o
f
u
r
a
n
o
s
i
d
a
s
e
)
(
A
T
B
E
T
A
F
R
U
C
T
4
)
A
t
1
g
1
2
2
4
2
8
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
3
5
(
b
e
t
a
-
g
a
l
a
c
t
o
s
i
d
a
s
e
)
(
B
G
A
L
1
)
A
t
3
g
1
3
7
5
8
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
3
5
(
b
e
t
a
-
g
a
l
a
c
t
o
s
i
d
a
s
e
)
(
B
G
A
L
9
)
A
t
2
g
3
2
8
1
1
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
3
5
(
b
e
t
a
-
g
a
l
a
c
t
o
s
i
d
a
s
e
)
(
B
G
A
L
1
)
A
t
5
g
6
3
8
1
7
,
1
3
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
3
8
(
a
l
p
h
a
-
m
a
n
n
o
s
i
d
a
s
e
)
A
t
5
g
1
3
9
8
1
3
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
3
8
(
a
l
p
h
a
-
m
a
n
n
o
s
i
d
a
s
e
)
A
t
3
g
2
6
7
2
4
2
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
5
1
(
a
l
p
h
a
-
L
-
a
r
a
b
i
n
o
f
u
r
a
n
o
s
i
d
a
s
e
)
A
t
3
g
1
7
4
2
7
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
7
9
(
e
n
d
o
-
b
e
t
a
-
g
l
u
c
u
r
o
n
i
d
a
s
e
/
h
e
p
a
r
a
n
a
s
e
)
A
t
5
g
7
8
3
1
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
7
9
(
e
n
d
o
-
b
e
t
a
-
g
l
u
c
u
r
o
n
i
d
a
s
e
/
h
e
p
a
r
a
n
a
s
e
)
A
t
5
g
3
4
9
4
7
C
E
f
a
m
i
l
y
8
(
p
e
c
t
i
n
m
e
t
h
y
l
e
s
t
e
r
a
s
e
)
A
t
3
g
4
3
2
7
1
C
E
f
a
m
i
l
y
1
3
(
p
e
c
t
i
n
a
c
y
l
e
s
t
e
r
a
s
e
)
A
t
5
g
2
3
8
7
9
O
x
i
d
o
-
r
e
d
u
c
t
a
s
e
s
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
S
K
U
5
(
S
K
S
4
)
(
m
u
l
t
i
c
o
p
p
e
r
o
x
i
d
a
s
e
d
o
m
a
i
n
)
A
t
4
g
2
2
1
6
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
S
K
U
5
(
S
K
S
5
)
(
m
u
l
t
i
c
o
p
p
e
r
o
x
i
d
a
s
e
d
o
m
a
i
n
)
A
t
1
g
7
6
1
6
7
,
8
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
S
K
U
5
(
S
K
S
6
)
(
m
u
l
t
i
c
o
p
p
e
r
o
x
i
d
a
s
e
d
o
m
a
i
n
)
A
t
1
g
4
1
8
3
7
,
8
,
1
2
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
S
K
U
5
(
S
K
S
7
)
(
m
u
l
t
i
c
o
p
p
e
r
o
x
i
d
a
s
e
d
o
m
a
i
n
)
A
t
1
g
2
1
8
6
7
,
1
2
,
1
3
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
S
K
U
5
(
S
K
S
1
7
)
(
m
u
l
t
i
c
o
p
p
e
r
o
x
i
d
a
s
e
d
o
m
a
i
n
)
A
t
5
g
6
6
9
2
1
S
K
U
5
(
m
u
l
t
i
c
o
p
p
e
r
o
x
i
d
a
s
e
d
o
m
a
i
n
)
A
t
4
g
1
2
4
2
3
,
6
,
7
,
8
,
9
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
p
e
r
o
x
i
d
a
s
e
(
A
t
P
r
x
2
2
)
A
t
2
g
3
8
3
8
1
1
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
p
e
r
o
x
i
d
a
s
e
(
A
t
P
r
x
2
8
)
A
t
3
g
3
6
7
4
9
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
p
e
r
o
x
i
d
a
s
e
(
A
t
P
r
x
3
3
)
A
t
3
g
4
9
1
1
1
1
,
1
3
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
p
e
r
o
x
i
d
a
s
e
(
A
t
P
r
x
3
4
)
A
t
3
g
4
9
1
2
2
3
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
C
.
p
e
p
o
a
s
c
o
r
b
a
t
e
o
x
i
d
a
s
e
(
P
3
7
6
4
)
A
t
5
g
2
1
1
1
1
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
b
e
r
b
e
r
i
n
e
b
r
i
d
g
e
e
n
z
y
m
e
(
S
)
-
r
e
t
i
c
u
l
i
n
:
o
x
y
g
e
n
o
x
i
d
o
-
r
e
d
u
c
t
a
s
e
A
t
4
g
2
8
3
1
3
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
g
e
r
m
i
n
(
A
t
G
E
R
3
)
A
t
5
g
2
6
3
3
2
P
r
o
t
e
i
n
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
n
g
d
o
m
a
i
n
s
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
c
a
r
r
o
t
E
D
G
P
a
n
d
t
o
m
a
t
o
X
E
G
I
P
A
t
1
g
3
2
3
9
,
1
J Exp Bot. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.
HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript
Minic et al.Page 17 P
r
e
d
i
c
t
e
d
o
r
k
n
o
w
n
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
A
c
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
S
p
o
t
n
u
m
b
e
r
b
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
c
a
r
r
o
t
E
D
G
P
a
n
d
t
o
m
a
t
o
X
E
G
I
P
A
t
1
g
3
2
2
3
9
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
L
R
R
r
e
p
e
a
t
s
)
A
t
1
g
3
3
5
9
2
6
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
L
R
R
r
e
p
e
a
t
s
)
A
t
1
g
3
3
6
8
,
9
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
L
R
R
r
e
p
e
a
t
s
)
A
t
2
g
4
2
8
1
4
p
o
l
y
g
a
l
a
c
t
u
r
o
n
a
s
e
i
n
h
i
b
i
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
P
G
I
P
2
)
A
t
5
g
6
8
7
1
3
,
1
5
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
l
e
c
t
i
n
(
l
e
g
u
m
e
l
e
c
t
i
n
b
e
t
a
d
o
m
a
i
n
)
A
t
1
g
5
3
7
1
3
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
l
e
c
t
i
n
(
l
e
g
u
m
e
l
e
c
t
i
n
b
e
t
a
d
o
m
a
i
n
)
A
t
1
g
5
3
8
1
3
,
1
4
,
1
5
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
l
e
c
t
i
n
(
l
e
g
u
m
e
l
e
c
t
i
n
b
e
t
a
d
o
m
a
i
n
)
A
t
3
g
1
6
5
3
1
,
1
3
,
1
4
,
1
5
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
l
e
c
t
i
n
(
c
u
r
c
u
l
i
n
-
l
i
k
e
)
A
t
1
g
7
8
8
5
7
,
8
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
l
e
c
t
i
n
(
c
u
r
c
u
l
i
n
-
l
i
k
e
)
A
t
1
g
7
8
8
6
7
,
8
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
l
e
c
t
i
n
(
c
u
r
c
u
l
i
n
-
l
i
k
e
)
A
t
5
g
1
8
4
7
7
,
8
,
1
S
i
g
n
a
l
l
i
n
g
f
a
s
c
i
c
l
i
n
-
l
i
k
e
a
r
a
b
i
n
o
g
a
l
a
c
t
a
n
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
A
t
F
L
A
8
)
A
t
2
g
4
5
4
7
1
,
1
3
,
1
4
,
1
5
f
a
s
c
i
c
l
i
n
-
l
i
k
e
a
r
a
b
i
n
o
g
a
l
a
c
t
a
n
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
A
t
F
L
A
1
3
)
A
t
5
g
4
4
1
3
3
P
r
o
t
e
a
s
e
s
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
a
s
p
a
r
t
y
l
p
r
o
t
e
a
s
e
A
t
1
g
9
7
5
1
1
,
1
2
,
1
3
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
a
s
p
a
r
t
y
l
p
r
o
t
e
a
s
e
A
t
3
g
5
2
5
8
,
9
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
a
s
p
a
r
t
y
l
p
r
o
t
e
a
s
e
A
t
5
g
7
3
1
,
1
1
,
1
2
,
1
3
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
a
s
p
a
r
t
y
l
p
r
o
t
e
a
s
e
A
t
3
g
5
4
4
2
1
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
s
e
r
i
n
e
p
r
o
t
e
a
s
e
A
t
1
g
3
6
7
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
s
e
r
i
n
e
p
r
o
t
e
a
s
e
A
t
2
g
3
9
8
5
5
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
s
e
r
i
n
e
p
r
o
t
e
a
s
e
A
t
4
g
2
1
6
3
1
2
,
1
3
,
1
4
,
1
5
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
s
e
r
i
n
e
p
r
o
t
e
a
s
e
A
t
4
g
2
1
6
5
1
,
1
3
,
1
4
,
1
5
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
s
e
r
i
n
e
p
r
o
t
e
a
s
e
A
t
5
g
6
7
3
6
1
6
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
s
e
r
i
n
e
p
r
o
t
e
a
s
e
A
t
3
g
1
4
6
7
1
8
x
y
l
e
m
s
e
r
i
n
e
p
e
p
t
i
d
a
s
e
1
(
X
S
P
1
)
A
t
4
g
2
3
9
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
s
e
r
i
n
e
c
a
r
b
o
x
y
p
e
p
t
i
d
a
s
e
(
S
C
P
L
1
1
)
A
t
2
g
2
2
9
7
1
4
,
1
5
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
s
e
r
i
n
e
c
a
r
b
o
x
y
p
e
p
t
i
d
a
s
e
(
S
C
P
L
1
2
)
A
t
2
g
2
2
9
2
1
5
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
s
e
r
i
n
e
c
a
r
b
o
x
y
p
e
p
t
i
d
a
s
e
(
S
C
P
L
3
4
)
A
t
5
g
2
3
2
1
1
2
,
1
3
M
i
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
a
n
t
h
e
r
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
r
o
l
i
n
e
-
r
i
c
h
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
A
P
G
(
l
i
p
a
s
e
a
c
y
l
h
y
d
r
o
l
a
s
e
d
o
m
a
i
n
)
A
t
1
g
5
4
1
3
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
a
n
t
h
e
r
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
r
o
l
i
n
e
-
r
i
c
h
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
A
P
G
(
l
i
p
a
s
e
a
c
y
l
h
y
d
r
o
l
a
s
e
d
o
m
a
i
n
)
A
t
1
g
6
7
8
3
1
2
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
p
u
r
p
l
e
a
c
i
d
p
h
o
s
p
h
a
t
a
s
e
A
t
2
g
1
6
4
3
7
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
p
u
r
p
l
e
a
c
i
d
p
h
o
s
p
h
a
t
a
s
e
A
t
2
g
2
7
1
9
1
3
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
p
u
r
p
l
e
a
c
i
d
p
h
o
s
p
h
a
t
a
s
e
A
t
5
g
3
4
8
5
1
9
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
C
h
l
a
m
y
d
o
m
o
n
a
s
r
e
i
n
h
a
r
d
t
i
i
a
p
o
s
p
o
r
y
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
a
l
d
o
s
e
-
1
-
e
p
i
m
e
r
a
s
e
d
o
m
a
i
n
)
A
t
4
g
2
5
9
1
3
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
g
l
y
c
e
r
o
p
h
o
s
p
h
o
r
y
l
d
i
e
s
t
e
r
p
h
o
s
p
h
o
d
i
e
s
t
e
r
a
s
e
A
t
4
g
2
6
6
9
3
5
U
n
k
n
o
w
n
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
A
t
1
g
2
1
6
8
5
,
6
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
A
t
1
g
2
1
6
7
2
,
3
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
A
t
3
g
1
4
9
2
1
4
,
1
5
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
D
U
F
6
4
2
)
A
t
4
g
3
2
4
6
4
4
,
1
3
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
D
U
F
6
4
2
)
A
t
5
g
1
1
4
2
1
,
1
1
,
1
2
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
D
U
F
6
4
2
)
A
t
5
g
2
5
4
6
1
2
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
D
U
F
1
5
)
A
t
4
g
2
9
3
1
1
3
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
D
U
F
1
1
8
4
)
A
t
4
g
1
8
8
4
6
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
D
U
F
1
6
8
)
A
t
5
g
1
2
9
5
5
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
c
u
p
i
n
d
o
m
a
i
n
s
)
A
t
3
g
2
2
6
4
3
4
J Exp Bot. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.
HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript
Minic et al.Page 18 P
r
e
d
i
c
t
e
d
o
r
k
n
o
w
n
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
A
c
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
S
p
o
t
n
u
m
b
e
r
b
I
n
t
r
a
c
e
l
l
u
l
a
r
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
s
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
t
h
i
o
r
e
d
o
x
i
n
A
t
1
g
2
1
7
5
4
5
G
H
f
a
m
i
l
y
1
A
t
2
g
2
5
6
3
7
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
s
e
r
i
n
e
p
r
o
t
e
a
s
e
A
t
2
g
5
9
2
3
,
9
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
s
e
r
i
n
e
c
a
r
b
o
x
y
p
e
p
t
i
d
a
s
e
A
t
4
g
3
6
1
9
5
4
3
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
p
h
o
s
p
h
o
r
y
l
a
s
e
A
t
4
g
2
4
3
5
1
2
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
g
a
m
m
a
-
g
l
u
t
a
m
y
l
t
r
a
n
s
p
e
p
t
i
d
a
s
e
A
t
4
g
3
9
6
4
1
2
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
a
l
d
o
-
k
e
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
t
a
s
e
A
t
2
g
2
7
6
8
3
7
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
p
e
r
o
x
i
r
e
d
o
x
i
n
A
t
3
g
5
2
9
6
2
5
h
o
m
o
l
o
g
t
o
c
o
p
p
e
r
a
m
i
n
e
o
x
i
d
a
s
e
A
t
4
g
1
2
9
9
2
1
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
P
H
d
o
m
a
i
n
)
A
t
2
g
3
8
8
3
6
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
R
N
A
r
e
c
o
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
m
o
t
i
f
)
A
t
3
g
5
2
9
8
4
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
A
t
2
g
4
1
9
5
4
8
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
(
C
B
S
d
o
m
a
i
n
s
)
A
t
3
g
4
8
5
3
3
8
a
F
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
p
r
e
d
i
c
t
e
d
a
s
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
i
n
E
x
p
e
r
i
m
e
n
t
a
l
b
S
p
o
t
n
u
m
b
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
s
t
o
F
i
g
.
1
.
J Exp Bot. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.
HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript HAL-AO Author Manuscript
Minic et al.Page 19
Table 3
Predicted functional classes of proteins in the A. thaliana stem sub-proteome
Functional classes have been defined according to Jamet et al. (2006). A list of all proteins identified in this study is provided in Table 2. The detailed bioinformatics functional analysis is given in Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online.
Functional classes Number of proteins Proteins acting on polysaccharides31
Glycoside hydrolases29
Esterases2
Oxido-reductases13
Peroxidases4
Multicopper oxidases6
Others3
Proteins with interacting domains12
Lectin domains6
LRR domains3
Others3
Signalling2
Proteases14
Serine proteases10
Aspartyl proteases4
Miscellaneous7
Homologs to phosphatase3
Homologs to proline-rich protein (lipase acid hydrolase domain)2
Others2
Unknown function10
Intracellular proteins13
Total102
J Exp Bot. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 16.
正在阅读:
糖蛋白的分离鉴定方法04-12
我喜欢的一项体育运动作文600字07-17
商品混凝土买卖合同范本09-07
优秀教师思想政治教育工作心得精选例文8篇08-04
启示作文800字06-22
会计从业资格、会计职称继续教育考试试题(0053)07-06
读故事背单词-高考student04-24
适合3-6岁儿童的亲子游戏05-27
dell - bios设置&IDE全攻略10-05
- 教学能力大赛决赛获奖-教学实施报告-(完整图文版)
- 互联网+数据中心行业分析报告
- 2017上海杨浦区高三一模数学试题及答案
- 招商部差旅接待管理制度(4-25)
- 学生游玩安全注意事项
- 学生信息管理系统(文档模板供参考)
- 叉车门架有限元分析及系统设计
- 2014帮助残疾人志愿者服务情况记录
- 叶绿体中色素的提取和分离实验
- 中国食物成分表2020年最新权威完整改进版
- 推动国土资源领域生态文明建设
- 给水管道冲洗和消毒记录
- 计算机软件专业自我评价
- 高中数学必修1-5知识点归纳
- 2018-2022年中国第五代移动通信技术(5G)产业深度分析及发展前景研究报告发展趋势(目录)
- 生产车间巡查制度
- 2018版中国光热发电行业深度研究报告目录
- (通用)2019年中考数学总复习 第一章 第四节 数的开方与二次根式课件
- 2017_2018学年高中语文第二单元第4课说数课件粤教版
- 上市新药Lumateperone(卢美哌隆)合成检索总结报告
- 蛋白
- 鉴定
- 分离
- 方法
- 城镇职工基本医疗保险定点零售药店服务协议书文本(标准版).docx
- 西藏中等职业学校专任教师数量情况3年数据洞察报告2022版
- 广东高考政治试题及答案
- 雅思写作大作文参考范文:学生是否应该评价老师
- 我在广西北海传销的日子——关于所谓1040工程
- 20222022苏教版初一语文期末试卷
- 房屋租赁合同范本押一付三
- 股权投资优秀建议书
- 系统解剖学复习习题
- 【CN110099282A】一种对直播类型应用中的内容进行监控的方法及系
- 第9课雷雨学案-广东省佛山市高明实验中学高中语文粤教版必修5
- 年电大个人理财题库及答案
- 街道社区工作总结报告格式
- 第五讲弱电解质的电离平衡 水的电离及PH值得计算
- 第七章--土地增值税作业与参考答案
- 欧债危机发生原因和影响及解决措施
- 浅谈柏拉图《理想国》的教育思想-最新教育文档
- 新外研版(三起)英语五年级上册教案Module-1Unit-1-Did-you-come-
- 嵌入式Linux系统简单应用软件开发
- 图形化编程是什么?