心理学方面的外文翻译

毕业论文（设计）

外 文 文 献 翻 译

译文题目：The Science Education Article Cultures 学生姓名： 专 业： 指导教师：

2015年1月10日

第 1 页 共 10 页

The Science Education Article Cultures

Longitudinal Study on Mental Health of University Students: Taking a Finance and Economics University for an Example // Li Zhejun

Abstract Objective: To study the overall situation and trend of freshmen's mental health

of finance and economics university in recent years. Methods: The University Personality Inventory (UPI) was used to test the 21 492 freshmen during 2009~2012 in Nan-jing University of Financeand Economics. Results: The mental health of students had a favorable development, the proportion of the students with serious mental health problems was among 6.95%~8.38%, the proportion of the students with mental health problems was among 11.99%~20.54%. Compared the answers of the key questions,the proportion of \in boys was significantly higher than those in girls （ p<0.05 ） ,the proprtion of older and younger students was higher than those in normal age （ p<0.05）,the pro-prtion of ordinary universities students was higher than those in key university and independent college （ p<0.05）, the top 10 mental health problems ware consistent in each grade. Conclu-sion: Colleges and universities should be insist in mental health survey in freshmen, improve mental health education, and focus on the groups with problems.

Key words college

students; mental health; University Personality Inventory

（ UPI）;longitudinal study

To fully understand the mental health of college students, build students' mental file Case, so that psychological problems early detection, early intervention and early treatment, my school from 2009 Since the beginning of newborn psychological online survey to obtain a more comprehensive and accurate The data. To understand the mental health of college freshmen in recent years, the overall Conditions and trends, this study will feed data 2009-2012 Statistical analysis

1 Research Subjects and Methods 1.1 Research Subjects

Nanjing University of Finance 2009 -2012 years to participate in freshman psychology class 21,492 copies of census questionnaires for the study. 2009 5014 people, Of which 1691 were boys and girls 3323 people; 2010 5107 people, including boys 1725 people, girls 3382 people; 2011 5774, of whom 1851 were boys, Girls 3923 people; 2012 5597, of whom 1669 were boys and girls 3928 people. The overall age of 15-23 years old.

1.2 Methods

Using Mental Health Personality Questionnaire 1 (University Per-sonality Inventory, UPI) tool for the investigation, the questionnaire contains 64 questions, which The first is the measured pseudo 5,20,35,50 title, the first (61-64) for the secondary theme, the rest 56 questions, each question a points score between 0-56 points, the higher the score description heart

The more serious management problems. UPI screening classification criteria are as follows: The

第 2 页 共 10 页

first category is satisfying Column one of those conditions: UPI score ≥25 points; the first 25 questions answered affirmatively; secondary

There are at least two problems at the same time make sure to answer questions. The second category is the following conditions One by: score between 20-24 points; the first title to make sure the election 8,16,26 Optional; there is a problem in the secondary question affirmatively choose. Does not belong to the first and second class were the first Three. The first category may have serious psychological problems, there may be a second class General psychological problems, the third category is the mental health of persons. Heart of the sea using a unified software online Surveying annually after admission The first two months were a time to complete the assessment within a week.

1.3Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS16.0.

2 The results

2.1 UPI screening overall classification

Form 1All grades UPI screening classification results

consulting experience A Class B Class C Class

Grade2009(n=5014398(7.491030(20.53586(71.5

35(0.70%) ) %) 4%) 2%)

Grade2010(n=5107428(8.38788(15.433891(76.1

34(0.67%) ) %) %) 9%)

Grade2011(n=5774441(7.64715(12.384618(79.9

45(0.78%) ) %) %) 8%)

Grade2012(n=5597389(6.95671(11.994537(81.0

35(0.63%) ) %) %) 6%)

1656(7.73204(14.916632(77.

Sum(n=21492)

149(0.69%) 1%) 1%) 39%)

As can be seen from Table 1, a class of students screened out at 6.95% distribution rate Between -8.38%, significantly higher than the four years 2010 2012 (p = 0.005), which He was no significant difference between the year of mental health from poor to good for, 2010 Class, 2009, 2011, 2012. II students sieve out ratio There was no significant difference between 2011 and 2012 between 11.99% -20.54% 2009 was significantly higher than that of 2010 (p <0.001), 2010 significantly higher than the 2011 level is explicitly Level (p <0.001). As can be seen, the maximum 2012 freshmen mental health, The 2009 and 2010 are poor. From consulting experience point of view, four years is not made Health and significant change, had received psychological counseling for students ratio 0.63% -0. Between 78% and less quantity.

2.2 Comparison of the total score for each grade UPI

Form 2All grades UPI scores of descriptive statistics

Grade2009

Grade2010

第 3 页 共 10 页

Grade2011 GGrade2012

M±SD 11.485±8.521 11.121±8.742 9.691±8.608 9.305±8.501

UPI average and standard score difference of all freshmen in Table 2, comparing the Grade scores are significantly different (F = 81.81, p <0.001), change over time Downward trend of the show.

2.3 Key topics differences in gender, age, on admission

Form 3Sex differences in analysis of different age groups

admission analyze key issues

TItle Comparison Project

8 family died in the past and unfortunately x2

p 0 0

16 Often insomnia x2

p

25 Want to commit

suicide x2 3.899 7.451

p 0.048 0.024

26 Lack of interest in anything x2 5.193 3.093

p 0.023 0.213

Sex(man or

18.435

women) Ages(<18/18-19/>19)

20.459

5.123 0.024 7.275 0.026

Admission line(First

7.32 0.026 1.645 0.439 0.216 0.897 6.425 0.04

/Second/Third)

Table 3 shows that in the four key questions 8,15,25,26, gender differences Significantly, significantly worse than boys and girls. Will be divided into three age groups, less than 18 years For the first group, the normal school age and that is not less than 18 years or less 19 The age of the second group, more than 19 years for the third group, comparing the three age groups Differences in the four questions. In the eighth title \old) to be significantly worse than the other two groups; in Question 16 \group

(<18 years) was significantly better than the other two groups; in the first 25 questions \commit suicide\groups; in the first 26 questions each year There were no significant differences between age groups. Newborn admission can be divided into one, two, Three, to compare the differences in admission in question 4. In the eighth title \interest \had no significant problems in different online admission Differences.

2.4 Ranked in the top ten four-issue projects

Form 4 UPI freshmen ranked in the top ten of psychological problems

Make sure to

answer Grade2

第 4 页 共 10 页

Title

Qualifying

grade20grade2

grade20

009

61you think relationships are important

63Should be responsible for the personal sexual behavior

20783 20675

1 2

10 1 2

011 2 1

12 1 2

64Premarital sex is acceptable 10882 3 3 3 3 58Care about others sight 10069 5 4 6 5 53It cares for dirty 10076 4 5 5 6 22Love worry 9281 6 6 7 9 62Love's purpose is to get

9045 11 9 4 4

married

52Anything not repeatedly

8929 8 7 8 7

confirmed not assured 57Total attention around 8732 7 8 9 8 28Lack of patience 8032 10 10 11 10 As can be seen from Table 4, between four freshmen reflected the psychological ask Problem is relatively concentrated, a slight change in the individual topics, mainly in the \of marriage is to \\number of \to worry about,\the slightly reduced. For secondary question of affirmative response rate is extremely high, 1,2,3,7 were ranked in the first place.

3 Discuss

3.1 Freshmen overall mental health status

Through four years of longitudinal comparative study, UPI screening rates in a class of students Between 6.95% -8.38%, two types of student screening rate of 11.99% -20.54% Room. Compare 2009 with 2010 vertical deviation, there may be the case with admission Some contact, higher admission line pressure may be more to their students. Previous phase Off The results show that a class of students in the detection rate of 11.35% -21.05%, two Students detection rate of 16.09% -34.09%. Compared speaking, our school a Students of the detection rate significantly lower detection rate in addition to second-class students than in 2009, Lower than other schools, that I school freshmen mental health break Combined normal 7, and generally benign development. This may exist with students and discipline of a Given relation, my school class for Financial Institutions, students mostly from Jiangsu and Anhui provinces, and more Number of relatively good economic conditions, and not far away from the home accessibility, both for Freshmen psychological adaptation to create a better environment. With the psychological Improve gradually in-depth understanding of the health and attention, and students' mental health Is gradually improving. And for a second category of concern is the psychological work of students Carried out as an important part.

第 5 页 共 10 页

本文来源：https://www.bwwdw.com/article/75jd.html