英语作文

You are required to write a composition within 200 words. Please follow the outline below:

1. who is dupposed to pick up the bill, men or women? 谁应该买单

2. Is it good to split the bill on dates? 约会中AA制怎么样

support your opinion with arguments

在现在的社会中，谈到在约会中应该由谁来买单，不同的人肯定会有不同的答案，这其中在地区、年龄、性别等方面的差异尤为显著，下面我就自己的经历谈下我的观点。

我认为在男女约会的场合应该由谁来买单，以及是否应该采用AA制，这主要是取决于双方的关系如何。如果双方的关系仅仅是普通朋友，这种情况的大多数场合是由男士买单，当然在双方进行商务谈判的过程中应该由邀请方支付，如果是在双方都有约会意向的情况下，就会采取AA制。 另一种情况，如果是在一方对另一方有追求的欲望时，这种约会通常情况下是由追求方买单的，当然要是被追求方的态度是拒绝，可能也会提出AA制或是他们自己支付。

当双方为确定的恋人关系，再出去约会谁买单就没有太大的影响了，双方都已经同意将自己交给对方，这个时候这件事就显得很微不足道了。 以上就是我的观点，在约会的过程中由谁买单的问题应该由当事人的关系而决定，不同关系的人约会买单的方式就会有很多。

During daily society, when it talks to who is supposed to pick up the bill on date, different people may hold different points, which in the region, particularly significant difference in age, gender, etc. Then let me own experience to talk about my point of view.

To my way of thinking，in the occasion of dating men and women who should pay for, and whether it should use AA or not, it mainly depends on their relationship. If they are just ordinary friends, in most cases, it is paid by men. Of course, in the process of business negotiations between the two sides should be paid by both, if it is in the case of dating intent on both sides, it will take the AA system.

Another case, if it is on one side to the other party shall have the pursuit of desire, this date is normally by the pursuer of pay. Of course, if the pursuing’s attitude is rejected, the pursuing prefers to AA or their own pay.

When both sides are determined lovers relationship, it’s no matter who pays the bill, causeboth sides have agreed to take over to the other. Above is my point of view, and the problem who will pick up the bill in the process of date should be decided by the relationship of the parties , on different relationship between participants will have a lot of patterns to pay.

Who is supposed to pay for dating

During daily society, when it talks to who is supposed to pick up the bill during a date, different people may hold different points, which in the region, particularly significant difference in age, gender, etc. Then let me own experience to talk about my point of view.

To my way of thinking, in the occasion of dating men and women who should pay for, and whether it should use AA or not, it mainly depends on their relationship. If they are just ordinary friends, in most cases, it should be paid by men. Of course, in the process of a business negotiation, the pay should be burdened by the two of them, which will lead to the AA system. Another case, if it is on one side to the other party shall have the pursuit of desire, this date is normally by the pursuer of paying. Of course, if the pursuer rejected, then, the pursuing will come to AA or paying on their own. For example, the American economic system it is the demand of individual consumers, coupled with the businessmen's desires to maximize profits and the desire of individuals to maximize their incomes, that together determine what shall be produced and how resources are used to produce it.

When both sides are determined lovers relationship, it's no matter who pays the bill, cause both sides have agreed to take over to the other. The above demonstrated my point of view, and the problem who will pick up the bill in the process of date should be decided by the relationship of the parties, on different kinds of relationship between participants will have a lot of patterns to pay.

Survival of the Fittest 适者生存

1. to what degree do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 在多大程度上你同意或不同意这一观点

2. Does it apply everywhere in human society?

它应用在人类社会吗

适者生存这一观点是出自达尔文的物种起源学说，本身是用来解释生物进化的过程中物种的兴衰，现在越来越多的人将它引入到人类社会，认为现在的人类社会就是一个优胜劣汰、适者生存的社会，而事实真是这样的吗？ 首先，在一定的程度上我是赞同这一观点的，毕竟人类社会也是一个存在于自然的社会，现在社会上的求学、就业、求医、住房等等各方面的压力日益增长，人们面临的竞争与挑战远多于自然状态下的动物，面对如此严峻的生存挑战，如果不能很好地适应这一切，那就意味着将被社会所淘汰，而结果轻则是无法养活自己，再严重就是可能会因为自己性格的问题丢掉一切甚至生命。

另一方面，我认为将它应用在人类社会还是有欠妥当的地方，因为相比于动物，大多数人还是充满爱心的，在他人因为困难无法生存的时候，人们还是愿意伸出援手的。 总的来说，将适者生存的观点用于人类社会是合适的，只是在一些很小的方面可能由于人类自身的因素让它变得不再恰当。

The view, survival of the fittest，is from Darwin's theory of the origin of species, which is initially used to explain the evolution of species in the process of the rise and fall, now introduced to the human society by more and more people who think now human society is a society full of survival of the fittest, but is this really the case?

First of all, to a certain degree, I agree with this view. After all, the human society is also a exists in the nature, and now the society’s study, employment, medical, housing and various aspects of pressure increasing, people are facing more and more competition and challenges than the animal under the natural state. Faced with such serious survival challenge, if not well adapt to all this, that means one will be eliminated by the society, and the light result is he or she is unable to support himself, more serious, he might lose everything and even lives because of his own character. On the other hand, I think it can be applied to human society and there is very poor, because compared with animals, most people still full of love, when others because of difficult to survive, people are still willing to lend a helping hand.

In general, it’s right to use the point survival of the fittest in the human society, expectlittle cases,in which human’s factors make it become no longer appropriate.

本文来源：https://www.bwwdw.com/article/6suv.html