松下supplier survey report--new

Panasonic Supplier Quality Assessment 日本松下公司供应商质量评估Date 日期 Supplier Name: / 供应商名称： Supplier Location:/供应商地址： Auditor:/审核员 SQA Manager:SQA 经理 ※ Rate each item 1 through 5/每一项分数值为1-5Category/ NO./项 分类 目号 1 Quality policy / 质量方针 Individual Item for Evaluation/评估项Has the supplier provided components to the automotive industry? If not, is there an intention to do so? 该供应商是否已经给汽车工业提供零部件？如果没有，是否有这一意向？ Automotive customer base 100% = 5; 75% = 4; 50% = 3; 25% = 2; <25% = 1 自动车客户评分标准：100% = 5; 75% = 4; 50% = 3; 25% = 2; Does the supplier have a quality policy and does the organization follow it? 该供应商是否有质量方针并且贯彻执行？ Does the supplier understand and comply to the environmental standards such as GMW3059, ELV or RoHS? Is there a policy, organizational support and equipment to comply? 该供应商是否理解并遵守环境标 准例如GMW3059,ELV或RoHS?是否有环境方针，组织支援和设备来履行这一标准？ Does the supplier comply to ISO-9000, QS-9000 or TS16949 standards? Register, IATF Certificate number, date and next surveillance audit. 该供应商是否通过ISO-9000,QS-9000或TS16949,注册，IATF 成员证书，注册日期和下次审查日期。 Does the supplier have different processes for automotive and other customer industries such as consumer products? [Sampling standard, Equipment designation, Operator designation, Examination items, Determination value, etc.] 该供应商是否为汽车行业或其他行业，例如消费品行业生产多种产品？[标准样件，设备操作指示书，作业 指示书，检查项目，判定值等。] What is the supplier's problem solving capability? (Organization, Problem Solving Method, Laboratory Equipment and Countermeasure Tracking) [Defect analysis technique, reproduction experiment verification, FTA analysis, outflow prevention and defect occur 供应商在解决问题能力方面有什么问题？(组织机构，解决问题的方法，实验室设备和对策跟踪)[缺陷分 析方法，再生产验证，FTA分析，防止流出和缺陷再发生] What is the supplier response time to a problem? [Temporary countermeasure and fundamental countermeasure/Analysis of wherefores/Cooperation with QC, engineer and factory/Schedule of target response, etc.] 供应商对问题的反映时间？[暂定对策和永久对策/原因分析/QC、工程师和工厂之间的合作打合/报告纳期等]

对应部署

Remarks/备注

体系室 体系室 体系室

2 3

4

体系室

5 Organization/ Human resource / 组织、人力资源

体系室

6

体系室

7

品管

8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

If reliability testing is performed, does the reliability testing suit car use and is the system implemented? (Initial fluid management, fixed period) Contents

of test, Standard of sampling test, Frequency, Place, etc. 品管，体 Does the supplier have a process 如果做可靠性试验，该可靠性试验是否适合汽车使用，且系统 系室 是否贯彻实施？(初始过程管理，试验周期)实验内容，试验样件，频率，试验场所等，该供应商有这方面 的流程？ Is the quality department independent? What is the quality organizational structure? 品管，体 品管课是否为一个独立的部门？质量组织机构怎样？

系室

What is the employee training policy? What is the reward system? 员工培训方针是什么？奖励方法是什么？ Does the supplier have an appropriate work environment? (5S Lighting/ Dust control/ Noise/ ESD/ Power surge, etc) 供应商是否有合适的工作环境？(5S 照明/灰尘控制/噪声/ESD/能源浪费等) Does the supplier have appropriate layout and flow of material? (Lean manufacturing, process skip/ Needless move/ Detention of in-process products/ Mixing of different models, etc.] 供应商是否有合 适的材料流动和规划？(不合理(倾向)生产，过程跳跃/不必要的移动/过程产品滞留/不同产品混淆等] Does the supplier have appropriate control plans and are they followed including subcontractors? 供应商是否后合理的控制计划并且贯彻执行，包括分供应商在内？ Does the supplier identify KPC, KCC or PQC in the control plan? Are these characteristics controlled? Are these characteristics determined by the FMEAs? 供应商是否在控制计划中识别KPC,KCC或PQC?这些特性得到控制了吗？这些特性是通过FMEA确定的 吗？ the supplier use SPC/Data analysis tools to control or reduce variation? Does 供应商是否采用SPC/数据分析工具来控制或减少变差？ Does the supplier have product traceability? [Narrowing down the number of target against abnormal lot is appropriate when lot problems occur? How about traceability, they can trace repair?] 供应商是否有产品可追溯性？[当批量问题出现时，可以对出现问题的批量缩小目标数据进行追查，可追溯性 是怎样的，可以追溯并修正吗？ Does the supplier have appropriate work instructions? Are they posted for the operator? Are they followed? Are there appropriate standards? 供应商是否有正确的作业指示书？这些作业指示书传达给操作者并且得到遵守了吗？有合适的标准吗？

体系室， 总务 体系室 体系室 体系室 体系室 体系室 体系室

Process control / 过程控制

16

17

体系室

18

Are there appropriate construction method, working method, jig-tool? Can they provide stable manufacture of quality? [Appropriateness of working method and jig-tool/ Unstable operation/ Variations of 体系室， operators/ Management when changing operation/ Metho 是否有正确的组织方法，工作方法和治 组立 具？这些能够保证产品质量稳定生产吗？[合

理的操作方法和治具/不稳定作业/作业员的变差/作业变更管理/ 方法] clear differentiation between good products and defect products? (Indications and fixed position Is there marking), etc.)[Before inspection and after inspection][Accepted lot and rejected lot, etc.] 良品和不良品是否有明显的区别？(表示和标记位置)等)[待检品和已检品] [合格批量和不合格批量等]

19

品管，体 系室

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

How is storage condition of material, stock and in-process products? [Time-limit management against expiration date of parts/ First in first out/ Management of extra load/ Environment/ Direct storage] 仓库 原材料、完成品和半成品的存储状况怎样？[防止零件超期的时间限期管理方法/先入先出/额外装载管理/环境/ 直接入库] Do they analyze and comprehend defect data of process and market also utilize them for improvement activity of quality? [Convene regular meeting of quality improvement/ Check sheet of troubles in the past/ 品管 Reflect to design standard, work instruction, w (供应商)是否分析并理解过程和市场缺陷数 据，并且利用这些数据来进行质量改善活动。 [定期召开质量改善会议/ 检查过去不良记录/制定标准，作业 手顺等] Are the inspection method and contents appropriate against shipment lot? [AQL/ Sampling inspection chart/ Inspection specification/ Inspection record/ Countermeasure confirmation of reject , etc.] 品管 出荷批量的检验方法和内容是否正确？[AQL/取样检验表/检验规范/检验记录/不良对策确认等] Is there a defined preventative maintenance system and calibration system? [Are daily check contents and periodic management items clear and appropriate? Is there no problem of expiration date 体系室， management?] 是否有一个详细地预防保守方法和校对方法？[日常保守点检内容和周期管理条目是否清 组立 晰正确？期限管理是否没有问题？ Are the condition setting of equipment and jig-tools appropriate? [Do they evaluate maximum and minimum of lifetime according to the management condition? Matrix evaluation, etc.] 制技 设备和治具的条件设定是否正确？[是否按照管理条件做了最大寿命和最小寿命的评估？矩阵评价等] Management change, quality confirmation data and approval route(Internal PAS) are maintained and complied when changing process? [Factory, Working method, Equipment, Production place, Process 体系室， conditions, Jig-tools, Change of raw materials and so on] 制技 管理变更，质量确认数据和批准程序(内部 PAS)得到执行并且当过程改变时得到遵守？[工厂，工作方 法，设备，生产场所，过程状态，治具，原材料变更等等] Is the supplier cooperating with PAS's objectives? 该供应商是否与PAS的目标协 营业？ 作？

Other / 其他

Facility Equipment 设备

、工具

= Quality Audit Evaluation Level/ 质量审核评估等级 Level 5 World Class / 世界级 Level 4 Meets automotive industry standards / 满足汽车行业标准 Level 3 Minor improvements needed / 需要较小的改善 Level 2 Immediate improvements needed / 需要立即改善 Level 1 Fundamental improvements needed / 需要从根本上改善

0Total Points / 总分数 104 - 130 78 - 104 52 - 78 26 - 52 26 >Continuous improvement / 持续改进 Continuous improvement / 持续改进 Systematic improvement / 系统改进 Immediate improvement / 立即改进Discontinue audit / 终止审核

F74112.R01

Page 1 of 1

日本松下公司供应商质量评估

Date 日期

Supplier Name: / 供应商名称：Supplier Location:/供应商地址：

Auditor:/

F74112.R01Page 1 of 1

本文来源：https://www.bwwdw.com/article/28i4.html